Why did Michigan State go for 2 point conv. when they still need 2 possetion for the game. They were down by 17 points, 31-14, they score a TD within a 1 min. left on the game. They kick a fild goal and it would be 31-21. They will need 2 scores. Final score was 31-22, the line was Penn. St -9. A push? What the fock?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anyone who thinks Lines are fixed
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ultra7Why did Michigan State go for 2 point conv. when they still need 2 possetion for the game. They were down by 17 points, 31-14, they score a TD within a 1 min. left on the game. They kick a fild goal and it would be 31-21. They will need 2 scores. Final score was 31-22, the line was Penn. St -9. A push? What the fock?
I was thinking the same thing;I didn't bet the game but it made no sense to me to go for 2. I think in all fairness the game closed at 8 in same places though.
Comment
-
Why did Michigan State go for 2 point conv. when they still need 2 possetion for the game. They were down by 17 points, 31-14, they score a TD within a 1 min. left on the game. They kick a fild goal and it would be 31-21. They will need 2 scores. Final score was 31-22, the line was Penn. St -9. A push? What the fock?
SS: Because they're coach is a douche bag.Fight, Devils Down The Field. Fight With Your Might And Don't Ever Yield.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SundevilSamWhy did Michigan State go for 2 point conv. when they still need 2 possetion for the game. They were down by 17 points, 31-14, they score a TD within a 1 min. left on the game. They kick a fild goal and it would be 31-21. They will need 2 scores. Final score was 31-22, the line was Penn. St -9. A push? What the fock?
SS: Because they're coach is a douche bag.
You bet too late. Penns St. open at like -7.5
I got it at 8.5. Lines move throught the day.
Comment
Comment