what was he looking at??/

[TwoTonTony]

BM, it's your opinion man. Look at what happened tonight? Look what happened with T.O. last season vs. Washington.

I'd throw Andy Reed and McNabb under the bus to. Those two donkeys know shit. You think these two will every be like holmgren and favre or bellichick and brady??? Any Reed and McNabb look clueless together.

what exactly does finger pointing in the press prove??? everything that needs to be said can be said in the locker room...and if you ever played sports it is not good to point fingers, because one day they will point at you...best thing is to suck it up, admit mistakes, keep problems in-house and have faith in the staff and your teammates....and if you have something bad to say...it will only do harm and divide a locker room.....So i do not get how him mouthing off is productive in the real world...

[capperjohn1]

some things are better said in house not through the media and for him to cry about his 100th td not being acknowledged should say what kind of guy he is...a ME guy.....i guess all teams have to ask themselves is a player who is extremely talented worth the turmoil he causes....he will continue to bounce from team to team looking to get a ring....but baseball has proved that it ain;t that easy...his act has been predicatable everywhere and in my mind i would rather have 2 - B receivers than 1 A+ talent guy that is a selfish and devisive figure on the team.....is the best out there = YES....would i want him on the Giants instead of Toomer and Burress...absolutely not.....

I agree some things should be in-house. But has he said things controversial that has validity to it? Yes. And everything he says is under a microscope. And in regards to individual accomplishments. Does anyone remember Farve allowing a sack for the Giants and shaking hands after the play? How about Emmitt and the rushing record? I am by NO means comparing TO to these guys, but records are acknowledged in the NFL.

[TwoTonTony]

I agree some things should be in-house. But has he said things controversial that has validity to it? Yes. And everything he says is under a microscope. And in regards to individual accomplishments. Does anyone remember Farve allowing a sack for the Giants and shaking hands after the play? How about Emmitt and the rushing record? I am by NO means comparing TO to these guys, but records are acknowledged in the NFL.

is that a record??? i am not sure......I believe you get back what you put in...Why would an organization he motherfucked want to honor him.....do you not remember the summer....in my mind he does not deserve anything and although it is nice to have accolades is that what he is playing for....is it the money or the pats on the back?? He is under a microscope....wouldn't that be all the more reason to not say anything like this....Nobody forced him to sign that 7 year deal....In fact if he were hurt or it went the other way i am sure he would demand his money.....He wants the security a long term deal brings, yet does not want the risk that goes with it.....The rest of this stuff is a moot point...He obviosuly wants out and this is the way he chooses to do it......Any way you slice that is dishonorable.....I look at him and the more i hear him talk he is a contradiction in terms......I respect his play..and that is it...I think he is a despicable teammate and opponent (dallas star thing).....I do not mind fun at games (chad johnson is fun)...he is an asshole.....but again it is just my humble opinion, which means nothing...

[capperjohn1]

He wants the security a long term deal brings, yet does not want the risk that goes with it..

"Security?" Can you explain? and risk? I am lost.

[bobj]

guys go to bed, long week of football. i think there's a football game every single day of this week into veterans day.