Tweet
Originally posted by Chuck E. Cheese
Let's call Wiz back...We need more of this interaction stuff....
It's good therapy....
It's good therapy....
-
Coverboy should be the last guy to make that statement 'cause everytime we let wiz back he attacked him! -
...............Rainman's Crusher= strongest play= 4-1
* Inside info is only good when you can share it with a bunch of friends.........
Comment
-
Maybe he's looking for a new friend:christmasOriginally posted by wayne1218
Comment
-
Which is the problem; the guy who is being cocky and making all claims about his picks, which he hasn't forced anyone to follow them OR a group of guys who has attacked him for the reason above?Comment
-
If you don't understand why we look down on the arrogance, you never will. It leads to problems and the Bullshit keeps getting deeper. This board isn't for kids or Stu Feiner. If you want either, you're in the wrong place!Originally posted by eagles5Comment
-
Franks a bitch!5* 0-0
4* 0-0
3* 1-0
2* 1-0
1* 0-1
God Bless America
To win :1* unit = $100Comment
-
Always seems like anyone that comes in with a strong opinion or is a little cocky gets banned. I thought this was supposed to be an open forum. If you dont like the guy, dont go into his thread............ I dont understand why a few guys make the decision for the entire forum. And I know there are many here that agree with me.
JMHOComment
-
Read above. He got 2 days for posting his email. Many others received 2 days for the same thing. Should i introduce the 6,000 members here and than talk about the last 10 that have been banned? Give me a break. New members come here daily without bringing problems ONTO THEMSELF like he did!Originally posted by THE ******Comment
-
I think you did the right thing wayne - anyone who claims to hit 83% of his "crusher" plays does not have the well-being of the forum members in mind - since anyone who has been around knows NOBODY hits over 80% consistantly. It would only hurt people who are new to wagering in the long run. As a side note - did anyone notice his original record he posted (49-4) is actually hitting at 92%. If you believe what rainman was dishing out, he was about to start a big ol' losing streak to get back down to his normal 83% winning percentage...so Wayne did you you a favor no matter how you look at it...2010 One play a day record
22-19-1 51%
+0.74 units
Passes: 7 days
Streak: L2Comment
-
Don't go into his thread? Are you serious? You know that won't happen. How about not coming here and posting total bullshit lies like (49-4)? How about just not doing that?Originally posted by THE ******Comment
-
I am shocked that some people are actually standing up for this clown. His arrogant nature just comes across the computer screen.Comment
-
larry, There's probably 5-10 people here out of 6,000 that wonder why and think i'm mean but unlike them, i don't have interest in watching the drama and I'LL take the heat for that!
Thanks Buddy!Comment
-
THANK YOU! 5 or 10 out of 6,000 doesn't change my opinion at all!Originally posted by dieselComment
-
I personally think the rule should be that any new person who wants to post plays should not be allowed to post his record obtained elsewhere unless he he has verifiable evidence for same.
If he/she does not have the evidence, the person should merely say something like "I have done very well elsewhere (another site(s)and want to share these plays with you;good luck to all who play them." Thats it. Why do we need to hear more? If the person wins, he will be commended by us, who are the ones who should be the judge.Last edited by savage1; 10-31-2005, 03:42 PM.Comment
-
Thank God for that!Originally posted by wayne1218Comment
Comment