That was soo weak. I mean how conservative can you play with a 10-0 lead. I saw Bledsoe on 3rd and 2, sitting in the pocket for a half an hour, just throw the ball away, with no pressure whatsoever. Lame.
That was soo weak. I mean how conservative can you play with a 10-0 lead. I saw Bledsoe on 3rd and 2, sitting in the pocket for a half an hour, just throw the ball away, with no pressure whatsoever. Lame.
The biggest know on Bledsoe has always been he holds the ball too long.
As a Giant fan and huge Parcell fan I've seen him lose these type of games too many times. He's a great coach but gets too conservative.
Wow....that's interesting since he is now 72-1 and when leading by more than 13 in the 4th quarter. I wonder how many times you've seen him lose "these type of games"? I've seen it once!
Wow....that's interesting since he is now 72-1 and when leading by more than 13 in the 4th quarter. I wonder how many times you've seen him lose "these type of games"? I've seen it once!
hahahaha if he had a pole smokeing troy aikmen he wouldnt have been in that situation, and would have never lost the game
rjeremy for my accounts manager/i love how he keeps numbers
First, that's regular season. How many games did he lose or almost lose when leading by less than 2 scores? There's many games the Giants should have blown out their opponent but Parcell's coaching style keeps teams in the game. Why do you think Parcells and Simms often arguing on the sidelines?
Second, how many games did he lose because he played conservative in the 2nd half.
I've watched far more Parcel coached games than you have. He's a great coach. But trust me his coaching style can be infuriating. Also, that 72-1 is inflated because he had a GREAT defense when he coached the Giants. That defense wasn't going to blow lots of 13 point leads.
One huge blown loss comes to mind. The 1989 Rams vs Giants NFC Playoffs game. The Giants should have blown out the Rams. But Parcells kept the Rams in the game. The Giants lost in OT at home.
Comment