Tweet
I agree with Frank, people are way too sensitive of objective criticism on this site. If all that went into each post was positive comments supporting the picks, one would never see the other side and believe me, there is always 2 sides to everything. I think voting in the polls is a valuable "tool" and we should all vote and evaluate the results. I read most of the posts, but put much more thought into the comments and reasons for the picks than the picks themselfs. The reason I don't post many plays on here is because I'm not good at picking games, but I do win following many of the cappers on here. The polls allow some of us to give back to the forum with our "bad" picks without posting losing records. Thanks for the polls Wayne. For those that don't like the idea, as always don't read them.
-
-
Spark I would but I don't think the main title will change as the software doesn't allow it.Originally posted by SPARKComment
-
My 2cents. Have you considered changing the format? I voted in few of them that I had some sort of opinion on but, I'm lazy I don't feel like opening each thread to cast a vote. It might be more attractive if 12-16 games(more?) were offered and you HAD to pick a side/total. It definitely would give you a bigger sample for purposes of the fade. Just a thought. I'll try to vote more.
Luck favors the prepared.
In the room the women come and go
Talking of MichelangeloComment
-
I'm voting for Doc for MOD in 06. where is that on the options in the poll section, did i miss it??????2013 NCAA POD Record
8-3ATS +3.80 units
2013 NFL POD Record
1-2 ATS -4.50 unitsComment
-
You can change the main title Monte ... I will show youOriginally posted by BettorsChatComment
-
Originally posted by SPARK
interesting2013 NCAA POD Record
8-3ATS +3.80 units
2013 NFL POD Record
1-2 ATS -4.50 unitsComment
-
I say whatever works. If fading BC polls is successful, so be it. I'll throw in my vote from my shitty skills at picking NFL games.Comment
-
I opened all the threads in their own window first then voted for each game. I closed each window after placing my vote. This way I'm not clicking back and forth.Originally posted by screwtapeMy 2cents. Have you considered changing the format? I voted in few of them that I had some sort of opinion on but, I'm lazy I don't feel like opening each thread to cast a vote. It might be more attractive if 12-16 games(more?) were offered and you HAD to pick a side/total. It definitely would give you a bigger sample for purposes of the fade. Just a thought. I'll try to vote more.Comment
-
The student teaching the teacher. I love it.Originally posted by SPARK
LOLComment
-
A NICE (2-0) Poll Fade Sunday night with K.C. & Under!Comment
-
How did you do that Yoda?Originally posted by SPARKComment
-
hahahahahaha I will send you a PM ...Originally posted by BettorsChatComment
-
baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhOriginally posted by BettorsChat
even monte thinks your old!!!2013 NCAA POD Record
8-3ATS +3.80 units
2013 NFL POD Record
1-2 ATS -4.50 unitsComment
-
(2-1) 67% fading the polls again last night!Comment
-
Fading Polls with Differences of 5 or more this week:
GB WINNER
GB Unders WINNER
NO Unders LOSER
Miami WINNER
Miami Over WINNER
NE
NYG
NYG Unders
Denver
Denver Unders
4-1 Through the 1 pm games.. wowComment
Comment