Is Playing the Fade System working??? You be the judge of it!!! Here are the results using $100 as a unit wager since the start of the baseball season!!!
Month of April; +9.1 units or +$910
Month of May; +6.21 units or +$621
Month of June; +3.99 units or +$399
Thru 9 July; +4.24 units ot +$424
So going into todays action (10 July), a $100 a unit bettor is up $2354 for the baseball season. Now what makes this impressive is the fact that we have had 2 months were we actually finished below 50% record wise. Baseball fades will work, mainly due to the fact that we are playing (rough estimate 98%) underdogs. We are playing the games that most people are saying that game can't win, but trust me gang, in baseball on any given day, any team can beat the other team!!!!!! Now another great thing about playing the fades (knock on wood), is we have not had more than a 2 day losing streak throughout the season so far. This gives a bettor the chance to increase his normal unit wager by a 1/2 unit or more, depending on each person's bankroll after a 2 day losing streak and betting it with confidence. We have also discovered that fade plays in the 90% and over category are hitting at a very higher rate. So far in the month of July there 4wins and 1 loss.
Fade criteria; We only play games that have a total of 15 or more service plays on them. There most be a difference of 7 or more services on 1 team, we then play the team with the lesser number of service plays. Example; today we have 3 services on the Athletics and 12 services on the WSox, the fade play would be to take the Athletics, since there is a difference of 7 or more services on the game and there is a total of 15 or more service plays on the game. I would consider this an 80% fade play, because dividing 15 into 12 would give me 80%.
For total plays; we use a total of 7 or more service plays on the game with a difference of 7 or more services on the over or the under. The reason we only use 7 or more service plays on totals is, because we don't get as many service plays on totals.
Tweaks I have made to the system! In listening to Spearit and Rip's suggestions!
1. I will not go against the Cardinals in game 1 of a new series!!!
2. I will no longer play fades on Tampa Bay and the Rockies when they are playing on the road. (worst 2 teams in baseball on the road)
3. I will suggest to increase your wagers when a fade play is in the 90% and above category.
I just thought I would write this thread on the fades to let everyone know how it's working so far. I have been doing the baseball fades for over the past 2 months pretty much day in and day out when Rip and Truckin stopped doing them on a daily basis. Ripple had a great idea, when he came up with the system and I believe through playing it almost on a daily basis and keeping records on a daily basis that it's the safest way to go in gambling! You can develop your own tweaks to improve the system to get stronger winning percentages, thats what makes keeping daily records a must when playing the fades. Enough rambling on, just thought I would let everyone know how the fade system was working so far!!!!!!
Krunch
Month of April; +9.1 units or +$910
Month of May; +6.21 units or +$621
Month of June; +3.99 units or +$399
Thru 9 July; +4.24 units ot +$424
So going into todays action (10 July), a $100 a unit bettor is up $2354 for the baseball season. Now what makes this impressive is the fact that we have had 2 months were we actually finished below 50% record wise. Baseball fades will work, mainly due to the fact that we are playing (rough estimate 98%) underdogs. We are playing the games that most people are saying that game can't win, but trust me gang, in baseball on any given day, any team can beat the other team!!!!!! Now another great thing about playing the fades (knock on wood), is we have not had more than a 2 day losing streak throughout the season so far. This gives a bettor the chance to increase his normal unit wager by a 1/2 unit or more, depending on each person's bankroll after a 2 day losing streak and betting it with confidence. We have also discovered that fade plays in the 90% and over category are hitting at a very higher rate. So far in the month of July there 4wins and 1 loss.
Fade criteria; We only play games that have a total of 15 or more service plays on them. There most be a difference of 7 or more services on 1 team, we then play the team with the lesser number of service plays. Example; today we have 3 services on the Athletics and 12 services on the WSox, the fade play would be to take the Athletics, since there is a difference of 7 or more services on the game and there is a total of 15 or more service plays on the game. I would consider this an 80% fade play, because dividing 15 into 12 would give me 80%.
For total plays; we use a total of 7 or more service plays on the game with a difference of 7 or more services on the over or the under. The reason we only use 7 or more service plays on totals is, because we don't get as many service plays on totals.
Tweaks I have made to the system! In listening to Spearit and Rip's suggestions!
1. I will not go against the Cardinals in game 1 of a new series!!!
2. I will no longer play fades on Tampa Bay and the Rockies when they are playing on the road. (worst 2 teams in baseball on the road)
3. I will suggest to increase your wagers when a fade play is in the 90% and above category.
I just thought I would write this thread on the fades to let everyone know how it's working so far. I have been doing the baseball fades for over the past 2 months pretty much day in and day out when Rip and Truckin stopped doing them on a daily basis. Ripple had a great idea, when he came up with the system and I believe through playing it almost on a daily basis and keeping records on a daily basis that it's the safest way to go in gambling! You can develop your own tweaks to improve the system to get stronger winning percentages, thats what makes keeping daily records a must when playing the fades. Enough rambling on, just thought I would let everyone know how the fade system was working so far!!!!!!
Krunch

Comment