question for coverboy...........i've only started checking you guys out this year...wasnt around last year....so i was wondering.....isn't it better to play a higher amount on a few strong selections versus playing a lower amount on alot of selections?
i get nervous playing so many teams at a time and like you said it only takes one or two to really make or break a good day.
We only play whatever games we feel we have an edge with ... no more and no less.
Last week there were many plays I know ... and it's not a comfortable feeling . 52 games last week ( 31-21) which is an average of 7 1/2 games per day .
Ideally we would like to see 2 - 3 - 4 games per day tops ... and all of them small underdogs. But it hasn't worked out that way .. yet anyway.
hi guys,
i see where your run line record is 41-20.
do you happen to know how many of those games were won by taking the +1 1/2 run?
the reason i ask is i wager through a neighborhood person and they dont give out the run lines, so i was just wondering if it was still profitable to bet those games at the money lines?
Good question ... I sent it over to Frank B our chief statistician.
First off please find someone who'll take Run Line action... it's a very important weapon in our arsenal . Many of our +1 1/2 Plays have won outright while many have also lost by 1 run giving us the cover anyway. Some of the +1 1/2 teams were also ML plays as well in the same game.
The exact record ... I'll leave to FrankB to hash it out.
Shop around .. perhaps open an off shore ( Pinnacle seems to be popular ) ... you can do nice things with both a neighborhood guy and an offshore outfit ... like MIDDLING the crap out of both and neither would ever see you coming.
Weiner, except if they lose, then you lose twice as much......you'd have to first cut your bet in half. So if you wanted to lay 200 on the CWS -1, you'd have to put ML 150 to win 100 and 100 to win 120. Thereby risking 250 to win 220.
Comment