Tweet
So I got an idea on Monday after considering interleague play that the dogs would be barking because it's such a change of pace for teams and because the games are less meaningful to the playoff-caliber teams (because if they play a divisional foe or conference wild card challenger then 1 win guarantees 1 more loss for that team you'll need to beat out for the playoffs)
I also figured that since the DH's would be dropped this time around and that the pitchers would be forced to hit that there might be a tendency towards unders.
Since my book offers ML/Total Parlays, then I decided to play each Interleague game on a Dog/Under parlay for a small amount ($10 per play for me) just to see if I could hit anything.
Well, even though it hasn't been a particularly large subset of games so far, the dogs are now 12-10 this time around and the totals are 8-12-2 after the Cubs 2-0 win today with 8 games containing both results. So my parlay system has a record of 8-13-1 for a gain of $153.62 using the lines that I had available at the time through 22 games.
Just wanted to throw this out there for everyone to consider. By no means would I ever go overboard on something like this because I'm playing so many games and this small set could very well be a coincidental deviation from the mean and/or the books may have caught up to the trend by now. All FYI.
GL to everyone today.
I also figured that since the DH's would be dropped this time around and that the pitchers would be forced to hit that there might be a tendency towards unders.
Since my book offers ML/Total Parlays, then I decided to play each Interleague game on a Dog/Under parlay for a small amount ($10 per play for me) just to see if I could hit anything.
Well, even though it hasn't been a particularly large subset of games so far, the dogs are now 12-10 this time around and the totals are 8-12-2 after the Cubs 2-0 win today with 8 games containing both results. So my parlay system has a record of 8-13-1 for a gain of $153.62 using the lines that I had available at the time through 22 games.
Just wanted to throw this out there for everyone to consider. By no means would I ever go overboard on something like this because I'm playing so many games and this small set could very well be a coincidental deviation from the mean and/or the books may have caught up to the trend by now. All FYI.
GL to everyone today.
Comment