KonSenseUsKruise (Tuesday)

[LVJimmy]

I thought Milw. was a POD yesterday? Was I wrong there?

p.s. Wally, you have mail!

There can be more than one POD as there was 2 yesterday. When games have staggered times, the possibility is def there for more than 1 POD.

[trick4]

Dodgers -140

(1-1) -.40

[RJeremy]

There can be more than one POD as there was 2 yesterday. When games have staggered times, the possibility is def there for more than 1 POD.

Thats what I thought. thanks man. Did we count those 2 yesterday as 2 winners for POD?

[SustainDan]

lets get em guys

[LVJimmy]

Thats what I thought. thanks man. Did we count those 2 yesterday as 2 winners for POD?

Yep, since the start of Kapt's Konsensus, PODs are 8-1 for an awesome +27.26.

[moondog22]

Lets face it,Monte has the best cappers here at BettorsChat.No need to go anywhere else to make money.

[phillysportsfan]

1-0
brewers -110

[chaching22]

!st post in consensus

Dodgers under 9 (120) (fading the legendary Brian Mac)

[Kaptain]

4:10 EST---3:10 CST game

LA Dodgers (5*)...strong play...have to consider it an erly POD, cause we have 2 games later on with 4* as of now...one more and we have duplicte POD's.....

Dodgers OVER (3*)---Dosgers UNDER (1*)---offsets--no plAY...gl fellows...the Kapt

rwall--sorry I'm late, just woke up from my "NAP"..

[BetweenTheLines]

2-1 on kapts cruise so far picking all ML dogs. Dog of the day. Nationals +170

[LVJimmy]

4:10 EST---3:10 CST game

LA Dodgers (5*)...strong play...have to consider it an erly POD, cause we have 2 games later on with 4* as of now...one more and we have duplicte POD's.....

Dodgers OVER (3*)---Dosgers UNDER (1*)---offsets--no plAY...gl fellows...the Kapt

rwall--sorry I'm late, just woke up from my "NAP"..

Kapt,
What's up buddy...not to step on your toes, but I have Dodgers as a 6* and over as a 4*, but with the one opposite, it cancels out. Thanks.

[RJeremy]

Are you saying if we have something as a 4* and someone is on the other side, the whole play cancels out????

Tell me thats not the case

[LVJimmy]

Are you saying if we have something as a 4* and someone is on the other side, the whole play cancels out????

Tell me thats not the case

RJ, it is the case...according to Kapt's original Konsensus thread, a game has to be 5 on one side vs. 1 on the other side. In this case, if one more LA/SF over would have come in, the play would have stood. See this for details...hope this helps buddy...

http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=58004

[Kaptain]

Sflinsj

Kapt,
What's up buddy...not to step on your toes, but I have Dodgers as a 6* and over as a 4*, but with the one opposite, it cancels out. Thanks.

You're 100% correct---the Dodgers should be a 6* POD..

I still show 3 overs, 1 under, can't find the 4th---either way it nullifies it self--has to be a 5-1 factor, this is what we originaly said, may change that to 4-1 factor--thats 80% in favor of....Heres some numbers

4-1 =1*, 5-1 =2*, 6-1=3*, 7-1=4*, 7-2 would drop back to 1*...as well as 7-3 would be 1*...

In increments of 5 games, i e , 4-1 =1*, each one added to that figure would constitute another *...thus 7-1 =4*....thus 10-1 would be a 6*....

Some may not like the idea of a 3-1 play being nullified, but we have to give all cappers equal credit...Majority--a heavy dose -- is what I'm trying to find here...It also gives creedence/credit to all cappers....

Lets say we have a 7-2...its a 1*---the 7 win, one can say the other two cost us money, lets reverse it, the 2 are right, instead of a 5 star loss, its now just a 1* loss because 2 cappers like it....This was intended for everyone to have an input, a sense of belonging, and contributing at the same time...

we've got some thing to work on, but the info is there for all of us....Sometimes tonight, I will make a sheet denoting won-loss and what they are worth in relation to *s...

[rounder21]

Weaver is off to a rough start.... Lets go BLUE!!!!