Sportsrmylife. The play is not Wake Forest. Looks like you are wrong on your info.
you are the one that posted it as wake forest. did he send you a private message to claim that wake forest is wrong. I don't doubt it as he banned me after I posted a few questions for him to answer. Tell me if my posts are deleted over there?
Keep posting his plays as I will fade them to the bank!!!
Get the best line possible....or you can just gamble!
How Can Anybody Take Vss Or Their Record Seriously?
Big East Goy A -170 Moneyline Favorite? Wake Forest -2?
With The Moneyline Losers They Have Their Customers Play And The Extra Vig They Lay On Every Game They Would Need To Hit 60% Just To Break Even. Their Record Is Meaningless When They Recommend Laying -170 Or Laying -140 And Buying Points That Is Insane.
lol it starts at 9pm bang duke ..140-0 services on wake
and ats ..wayne root & alatex and others all love wake
this is one exception to the service burial rule. spec k 20* on wake means even the public wins every once in a while! gotta go with the best bb service. GL tonight
btw- has anyone noticed steve turner and his 14-3 record on 3 stars! he's starting to heat up (you knew he would) but seems to be in love with memphis this year and been burned with his big 5 stars!
0-3-1 ON THE ATS Lock Club for-12.1 units or $1,210.00 for the night. You go to their website and you would believe they were hitting 70% for the year. Unbelievable. For the week they are down-21.5 units already. These guys suck. Keep fading these frauds
Underdog, I hear ya bro, but that service went 200+ games over .500 last season and is currently ranked in the top 5 monitored basketball services at Watchdog Sports in overall win/loss record. I am personally against their methods, but I value their info (I take the money line recommendations into consideration because those somehow turn out to be close games most of the time but I ignore most of the point buys). Also, they leave the option open for people to lay or take the points instead of taking the money line, it is always up to the player. They present the game based on how they are personally playing the game.
Their football 7%'s and basketball 6.5-7%'s are particularly strong. 5-0 in football this season and after winning UConn tonight now 3-0 in basketball. Another point to mention is that although not reflected in the consensus report record keeping that is posted on this site, their % of bankroll won/lost accurately includes the extra vig you mention. People buying the points would share their listed results while others NOT buying points (arguably) come out ahead of the game anyway (with a slightly different win/loss record BUT a better % of bankroll won due to less vig). Different services need to be read in different ways (like Private Players with all of Joe's different "clubs"), but with all of the 200,000* lock bull$hit scamming services out there, I will take the service you mentioned any day of the week and seven times on Sunday. Just my thoughts, I am sure everyone has differing opinions but I find them to be honest and reliable as a whole (especially when compared to services like ats as jesscolb just mentioned!).
friday, I couldn't agree with you more. Fading services is definitely profitable, but tonight most of the GOOD services were all over St Joe's. For my money, I would rather fade the bad services or fade a particular side of a game when a majority of the non top services are on one side. Pretty hard for me to ever consider fading a Private Players 5%. How anyone can think they will make money going against plays that are 60+% over the years is beyond me. Just offering my opinion. bol to all
friday, I couldn't agree with you more. Fading services is definitely profitable, but tonight most of the GOOD services were all over St Joe's. For my money, I would rather fade the bad services or fade a particular side of a game when a majority of the non top services are on one side. Pretty hard for me to ever consider fading a Private Players 5%. How anyone can think they will make money going against plays that are 60+% over the years is beyond me. Just offering my opinion. bol to all
OBE
What makes you think that these plays are 60%+ over the years????????
Comment