Tweet
Breadman-no hard feelings, but YOU were the one who said Phil's messages did not exceed three minutes, which means in effect that you were challenging statements made by me and Coverboy that the messages sometimes lasted up to five minutes.
Even though the message YOU received today may have been 3 minutes, the one I received lasted four minutes plus.
Why he has longer messages on his 800 numbers than on his local numbers is beyond me, but you were out of line to infer that I and Coverboy were making up what we said about the length his messages;that was my only point!
ps It appears that there was a misunderstanding here, as perhaps you and for that matter I assumed that length of phone messages was approximately the same no matter what number you called.
The more I think about our bickering, the more I realize how absurd the argument is in the first place when compared with what else is going on in the world today.
:D
Even though the message YOU received today may have been 3 minutes, the one I received lasted four minutes plus.
Why he has longer messages on his 800 numbers than on his local numbers is beyond me, but you were out of line to infer that I and Coverboy were making up what we said about the length his messages;that was my only point!
ps It appears that there was a misunderstanding here, as perhaps you and for that matter I assumed that length of phone messages was approximately the same no matter what number you called.
The more I think about our bickering, the more I realize how absurd the argument is in the first place when compared with what else is going on in the world today.
:D
Comment