will someone doulbecheck these 2 trends

[TRUCKIN]

conferece match between 2 winning teams (more than .500)
play the road dog if they are coming off a double digit loss both su and ats

play iowa +13 at michigan
since 1990 42-16 ats 4.2 plays a year

conference matchup between 2 winning teams (more than .500)
plat the home dog if they are coming off a double digit win both su and ats and have won at least 2 consecutive games su.

play stanford +21.5 vs usc
since 1990 33-12 ats 3.3 plays a year

just want to make sure they are in the system

thanks

[Larry29]

Yes, they both qualify , but Stanford hasn't played in 2 weeks. I think they easily cover against USC. As for Iowa-----offense is bad, only return 4 starters. I'd play the under 40.

[fjb2929]

truckin

2 nice trends-can you keep an eye out for the next plays!!

[gamblin1]

“conferece matchup between 2 winning teams (more than .500)
play the road dog if they are coming off a double digit loss both su and ats”

I get….63-35 overall, 48-18 on road dogs between 3.5 and 17

7-7 on road dogs of 3 < and 8-10 on road dogs of 17>

play iowa +13 at michigan

”conference matchup between 2 winning teams (more than .500)
plat the home dog if they are coming off a double digit win both su and ats and have won at least 2 consecutive games su.”

I get…54-39 in conference play if they are off of a DD win.
41-25 if they beat the spread by 10+ in last game and
11-4 if they beat the spread by 10+ and they are +9.5 or >

[TRUCKIN]

when i find them i will post them

i have some for nfl that went 5-1 this weekend and have one for tonight

play over on regular season mnf div fav of less than 7 pts if their last game was in conference

78 % ats

over 36 i love it because everybody is on the under also

when i say everybody i mean where ever i look i see alot of unders and unders in teasers posted
gl