Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BC/Wayne

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    savage i'm the only moderator here for ALL forums. Who else would you be talking about than?

    Comment


    • #17
      P.S.

      Savage you are 1 member the others in an overwhelming vote should get to decide. We vote on everything else in this world.

      Comment


      • #18
        P.S.

        This bullshit will not end until they are gone or about 30 members are. Enough is enough!

        THE CANCER MUST BE REMOVED TO PUT THIS BOARD INTO REMISSION!!!!!!!

        Comment


        • #19
          savage the poll speaks for itself. 4 out of 34 people vote to keep them both and one was an admitted charity vote for laughter from Tony. So that leaves 3 of 34 ..................... Maybe YOU are missing something here.

          Good night

          Comment


          • #20
            Wayne-I am a little confused. I wasn't sure who closed the thread. Monte? you tell me.
            Believe me, if I was sure it was you, I would have said so.
            Unlike many I don't make accusations unless I know for sure.
            To change the subject,look at the judgmental language you are using. Rid ourselves of cancer;that is oretty judgmental.
            if you want to knock Ty based on what he has said and your feelings, ok.
            However, you have NO definitive proof in my judgment that EC is a fraud(as stated, ,besides me ,Frankie also has dealt with him and the results have been good, and he did well in the contest), and you really haven't proven that the $100000 was not paid out(obviously you and I have different opinions about how important that is relative to who did better in the contest).
            As stated last year when Nutt was doing lousy on his own, he emailed me some of ECoast's picks, which he said he had started to use, and the picks were good.
            I am not a lawyer, butyat the very least your claims with at least ECoast and/otr Nutt would NEVER hold up in a court of law based on what has been presented as evidence especially when people like me and Frankie can show otherwise.
            Perhaps my feelings are what they are as I am more liberal to begin with, but in any case I don't feel a strong enough case has been made by you to ban anyone at this point.
            I think you should concentrate on what to do in the future.
            Banning is an inppropriate, unsubtantiated and subjective at this point.

            Comment


            • #21
              savage1,

              What you state about holding up in Court is true, but neither would what EC or Ty has stated would hold up in Court either.

              And i'm the one who closed those threads down in the sports service section, as I explained to EC as they will only lead to more bashing which this site doesn't need.

              Comment


              • #22
                why is this issue still going? i saw a thread this morning saying gaston had proof and he was looking for a fax machine or soemthing and it still hasn't been resolved? there must be a 3rd party somewhere in vegas that knows this site that can intervene and sort all of this out.

                savage makes a point. ec/ty haven't proven that the contest was real, but i haven't seen any proof that ec and baseball nut is the same person either.

                in other words..it's just a festival of name calling and abhorently filthy language. if you wanna ban them cause this whole nonsense has screwed up the forum do so...probably better off that way.

                but nobody on either side has proven shit about anything.

                Comment


                • #23
                  BC

                  I totally agree this Site is ABOUT WINNING MONEY and HELPING OTHERS. The bashing is old and I for one am tried of seeing it. Move on to something important.

                  Who cares about those two services TY and EC. Lets get back to what really matters and why were all here. " WINNING MONEY AND THATS THE BOTTOM LINE"

                  Enough said HOMER out
                  1 of 1 Morons

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Meteor and Homer-I agree with you wholeheartedly.
                    As an analogy, let say you are pro choice(abortion) and are vehement about it.
                    If you attend a rally and see protesters , whom you can't stand, do you try to kick them out because you disagree with them?
                    If you think they are all wet, you just hold your rally and ignore them and go about your business.
                    Obviously this instance is different because there was no possible lying involved.
                    However, point is the same;we live in a democracy, and I feel it is wrong to ban anyone especially in view of the fact that nothing was said and no one was hurt to warrant banning and even more so because childish things and accusations were made on both sides of the issue;live and let live or at least come up with rules to abide by in future before banning anyone NOW.
                    BC-I know you are trying to do your best, but I have to ask at what point do you decide to say "Enough?" I ask that in all honesty.
                    Perhaps a vote should be taken at the point at which you feel all has been said that should be said(that is just a suggestion).
                    Last edited by savage1; 06-02-2004, 12:28 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Homer

                      AMEN HOMER !! Well said.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X