Friday Dunkel Rpt

[rpr39962003]

I Placed astericks ***** in front of teams that are either even or u/d's. Last nite u/d's were 2-1, with Minnesota at +140 losing 2-1. I am a rookie to the chat and wanted to contribute to the cause so I paid for the Dunkel service. Good Luck. Rob R.


FRIDAY, MAY 7

National League
Chicago Cubs* (Zambrano) 11.49 (3 1/2) Colorado (Estes) 8.23
St. Louis (Morris) 9.90 (2) Montreal* (Kim) 7.81
Los Angeles (Alvarez) 9.15 (1/2) Pittsburgh (Perez) 8.44
New York Mets* (Glavine) 11.45 (3) Milwaukee (Davis) 8.41
Cincinnati* (Lidle) 9.79 (2) San Francisco (Rueter) 7.94
*****Houston (Redding) 10.69 (1) Atlanta* (Thomson) 9.70
*****San Diego (Peavy) 10.90 (3) Florida* (Pavano) 8.05
Arizona* (Johnson) 10.96 (1 1/2) Philadelphia (Padilla) 9.65

American League
Chicago White Sox (Garland) 9.92 (1) Toronto* (Lilly) 8.88
Boston* (Wakefield) 11.90 (4 1/2) Kansas City (Affeldt) 7.40
*****Cleveland (Lee) 9.61 (1/2) Baltimore* (Bedard) 9.17
Texas* (Benoit) 11.83 (4) Detroit (Bonderman) 8.05
New York Yankees (Lieber) 9.93 (1) Seattle* (Franklin) 8.72
*****Minnesota (Santana) 9.47 (1) Oakland* (Redman) 8.41
Anaheim* 11.08 (3 1/2) Tampa Bay (Hendrickson) 7.70

[rpr39962003]

DUNKEL NBA

FRIDAY, MAY 7

PLAYOFFS (Semifinals)
Detroit* 125.7 (14) New Jersey 112.0

I took Detroit at -5, Dunkel has them at 14 (9 pt cushion). Just thought I would post. Good Luck.

[frankb03]

Rob

Thanks for your input. The use of the *s is a good idea.
GL!

[Tony Vegas]

Question for rpg, frank, or Coverboy!

What does the number next to the team mean? Is it a rating or the amount of runs they predict? I am thinking it is not the number of runs b/c every one is so high. Thanks for the input

[frankb03]

Re: Question for rpg, frank, or Coverboy!

Originally posted by Tony Vegas
What does the number next to the team mean? Is it a rating or the amount of runs they predict? I am thinking it is not the number of runs b/c every one is so high. Thanks for the input

A rating. You are correct! It can't be the number of runs. They are all too high.

[frankb03]

Tony

On a unrelated note. If you want to incorporate Ty's record that I've posted into the record you post please do so. I don't care if you or I post his entire record. As long as one of us does it.

[Tony Vegas]

Re: Re: Question for rpg, frank, or Coverboy!

Originally posted by frankb03
A rating. You are correct! It can't be the number of runs. They are all too high.

Thank you sir! Exactly what I thought:D

[Tony Vegas]

Check out the thread in sports service fourm. Didn't want to waste space in another thread about Ty! sorry rpr!

[frankb03]

Originally posted by Tony Vegas
Check out the thread in sports service fourm. Didn't want to waste space in another thread about Ty! sorry rpr!

I didn't mean in a new thread. I meant when you and I reply to Ty's daily post. You can use the record I posted since day 1. This way both of us don't have to do it.

Rob, I'm sorry about using your thread.

[rpr39962003]

No problem

Frank, no need to apoligize. This Dunkel system of taking U/D's has me thinking that we can use the same mindthought of the books. If lines are computed using stats and public opinion and ratings are based on stats alone, why is it not logical to at least maintain 50% or better on u/d's rated higher. Especially if the ratings prove to be more accurate, that is the million dollar question. I have been thinking if it would work for other sports like football and basketball, if you took u/d's on the moneyline.