Sunday fade plays

[wizardofoddz]

Celts

Detroit

Over Baltimore

KC

Pittsburgh

[hazsupport]

Wiz

How many hot chicks on these? Thanks hc

[frankb03]

Yesterdays fade plays 1-3.
Since 4/24 1-3

hazsupport these aren't his selections. These are fade plays. A test from our debate in a thread on Friday.

[Sportsrmylife]

Wiz.

Great to see that you are continuing your success here. Have been following very closely for a while now. I do have a question though. Are the fade plays the side that you are recommending that we play or play the opposite? So do we play the celtics or play the other way?

Also where are you getting your info from for these types of plays? Looking forward to seeing what you are in later today since you last two big wins (under csox and the nuggets last night) were easy money investments.

Thanks wiz

[wizardofoddz]

Sportsrmylife

these are just what they say they are, fade plays. The only one I am playing is the Celts.
Just tryin to make a point as far as fade plays go.
I can see I'm going to have to stop this as it is going to confuse people
THESE ARE NOT MY PLAYS

[wizardofoddz]

adding

OVER MONTREAL

[Sportsrmylife]

I knew that they weren't your plays but just wanted to know if those ARE the faded plays or if they need to be faded yet. thats all.

are these fades from a consensus site?

[MemphisMafia]

Wiz :

I can see I'm going to have to stop this as it is going to confuse people
THESE ARE NOT MY PLAYS

End Quote :

I knew without a doubt in my heart that this would happen because of lack of attention , and add to that about 90% of the people here are not paying attention on a day to day basis.

Being lazy , they like to stop in for a quick moment and soak-up what they can , then go about thier business feeling confident that they have accomplished that. I get asked quite often a question that has the answer right under thier post ...... that is being lazy-mined and wasting tons of space because of thier lack of paying attention .

Not making reference to anyone who posted here , but that is the case quite often and it can be extremely annoying and a total waste of valuable time (mine).

By the way those two unders that I mentioned yesterday hit in a big way . When I mentioned they where run scoring machines I was taking the 2nd & 3rd most productive teams in baseball .

St. Louis - W
Detroit - W

Most minds would float to Houston #1 or Colo #4 as a gauge to go by with a statement of such .

G.L. on this , and depending on where you get your info you might prove a point to a degree because cash slingers are usually (55% to 65%) on the wrong side . I reinterate once again " I wouldnt fade a Mule in the Run for the Roses " , might not take him but fading is in my opinion a tool that holds no value.

Wishing The Best for All


G.L.

***MMM***

:cool: :cool: :cool:

[frankb03]

WIZ

Originally posted by ************
I can see I'm going to have to stop this as it is going to confuse people

Wiz, if you want you can email the fades to me. I'll post them.

Below my posts click on the Profile button. Add yahoo.com to my Yahoo Instant Messenger Handle to email me.

[wizardofoddz]

Memphis

Don't take me wrong here, I am not a fade player. It is a tool in my arsenal, but by no means is it what I do to pick a side. If I see an angle in a game and people are all over the game, angle NO GOOD.
This is turning out to take up to much time.

And Yes, good job with those totals.

Sportsrmylife, these picks have already been faded

[Sportsrmylife]

wiz.

thats all that i wanted to know. sorry about taking up so much time for a simple answer.

good luck!!

[MemphisMafia]

Wiz :

Don't take me wrong here, I am not a fade player. It is a tool in my arsenal, but by no means is it what I do to pick a side. If I see an angle in a game and people are all over the game, angle NO GOOD.


I never thought that myself (not in a lifetime) and I must have implyed that in some manner then . Never was that my intention Wiz , I was just pointing out my style , not yours big guy .

I have been watching your plays for 2 years now (only one here) and I would have given 50:1 that your not a fader per-say. Its a given that I have seen some strange ones out of you , and even cashed on a few myself as said in my replys , I just dont allow myself to "watch " the masses til after the fact . And I have found that by watching , reading , listening to others that I sometimes get bit in the butt when I was sold on a wager and went against my own grain .

Anyway I thought you ought to know that I dont think that , never have , never will . It would have shown a long time ago if that was the case

G.L. Today and congrats on your nags so far , I should have been coat-tailing you but was far to busy on my end ( :angryfire ) but thats the way it goes !

***MMM***

:cool: :cool: :cool:

[wizardofoddz]

Sportsrmylife

Not you taking up my time, trying to figure out the fades is time consuming.
I'd be glad to answer anyone's questions.
Don't take me wrong, you weren't taking up my time or bothering me.
Looks like I'm going to eat crow here.

Frank, you are 100% right.

There, now this is over with.

[Sportsrmylife]

************

I know that you spend alot of time doing what you do and the fact that I am only starting my "playing" career I may seem to pry for answers when those questions may seem basic in your and others eyes since the number of years that you have in this business.

So some questions that I do have is besides *********.com, where are some other sites that can give you an indication where the people are picking? Plus is there anywhere on the net that shows you where some money is going?

Also what are some sites that you use to get your info from? I know that some of these questions might not have exact answers but if you would at least address them so that I dont' think that you just passed over them.

thanks

[frankb03]

wizard

My apologies! I didn't know trying to figure out the fades is time consuming.

Also, no need to eat any crow. My contention is and continues to be Joe Public long-term hits 50%. Some a litle more and some a little less. Joe Public has had a good weekend. I fully expect that to even out.

I truly believe when you booked your clients lost far more than they won. I believe on a percentage basis they were probably close to 50%. They lost more money than vig mostly because Joe Public uses very poor money management.

I have a question. When you were booking if a client was losing early in the week did his wagers increase compared to when the client was winning? I think the Public chance their loses. They don't adhere to money management.