I never trust the claims of services that tout astonishing won-loss records when those services are not monitored. If someone really was hitting 81 percent or whatever, don't you think they'd WANT that to be monitored??
I've fond the Sports Monitor (www.sportsmonitor.com) to be an excellent way of evaluating services. While it isn't perfect because:
a) they don't post services with losing records; and
b) some services create eight or nine different clubs (Wayne Root and Co. are notorious) to guarantee that two or three of their clubs have top records.
Still, every service that I have used that is tracked by the Sports Monitor has had its record posted honestly (I track the picks of any service I use so I can verify).
I'm high on Special K right now in hoops because I track the plays and know that their glosssy record as posted at the Sports Monitor is accurate. Not all strong services are monitored but those that claim great records and are not monitored are not to be trusted. The Jack Prices of the world, not to mention some of the others that were referenced here, will never be monitored because their con acts would be exposed. For what it's worth.
No way, I disagree with you, some services don't belong to sites like that because that charge a fee, why the hell would you charge $300.00 per client just to keep a record, that is one of the biggest scams I know, it's even better than the touts! I think the best way is just to keep up with it your self, most services get posted here and I don't blame them for not belonging to something like that.
Originally posted by SharpePlayer We all know that for the most part when services overwhelmingly agree on one side or total that it usually loses. Now, although today, there is no overwhelming Consensus amongst the services, I still think its a good idea to post even a small to medium lean.
I like your idea! Too many times when there's an overwhelming choice amongst the services more times than not the selection loses. IMO, don't waver from that 'system'. If you do you'll dilute the importance of posting an overwhelming selection by posting less selections.
hey spark,whats up with you and w.g. i noticed youve been razzing him the last couple of days. any ideas on this?you have my mail if you dont want to post . gc.
gc.....HE JUST RUBS ME THE WRONG WAY...THEY THINK OVER THERE THAT THEY ARE THE HOTTEST FORUM WHEN IT COMES TO SERVICE PLAYS....HE HAS ACCUSED ME OVER AND OVER FROM STEALING PLAYS FROM THE ******** FAGGOT SITE AND I HAVE NEVER STOLEN A PLAY THERE...NOW HE SAYS HE HAS SET ME UP BY PUTTING IN A PHONY SERVICE...gc, YOU KNOW HIS PLAYS ARE ALL OVER THE SITES...IF YOU WANT TO MAIL ME I WILL GIVE HIM OR YOU THE SITE THAT I PULLED IT OFF OF....EVERYTIME I PUT A PLAY HERE I GO THERE AND THE PLAY IS THERE BUT ALL RE-TYPED...THEN THE OWNER COMES ON THERE AND SAYS THAT HE PAYS FOR ALL THE SERVICE PLAYS...THIS IS NOT REALLY WORTH THE TIME....BUT I HAVE NEVER PULLED A PLAY FROM THERE...THANKS gc,...EVERYONE HERE KNOWS THE WAY I SHARE EVERY PLAY I GET......
Fuck them Spark! I got banned from over there because I called them out on this shit. WG made a post that said all service plays stay here and are for members only. I replied by saying how can you make a statement like that when you get your plays from other forums (meaning here). Everybody got all up in arms because they said he pays for all of those picks. Get the fuck out of here, he don't pay for shit. It's amazing how the plays pop over there 5 minutes AFTER they get posted over here. Fuck that fat piece of shit CEO too. He's a coward and has no idea how to run a forum. That's why there are only 6 members over there and 5 are moderators!!
Originally posted by BettorsChat Spark its the other way around they take them from this site
bettors and Mike...you have made my night...Those guys are real
characters and everyone should know this...that is why I was egging him on a little...but then he goes and puts in a fake Service...Just shows you what kind of ass-holes they really are...I said right up front and clear as I could...willyg, NO NEED TO RE-TYPE THIS......
Comment