Spark's Picks for Monday

[Spark]

Let's Try These ...


San Diego Padres
T. Stauffer -10

Chicago White Sox
J. Danks -25




Good Luck Guys

[kbsooner21]

Good luck pal! Wanted to get your thoughts on Red Sox and Twins tonight if you don't mind?

[Udog]

Good luck tonight, Spark! I had the White Sox, too. I think I'll look a little harder at San Diego.

[Spark]

Good luck pal! Wanted to get your thoughts on Red Sox and Twins tonight if you don't mind?

Almost played Wakefield. I think Boston with Wakefield at -10 is good value. Minnesota lost eight out of the last ten games. Minnesota is 1-5 SU in its last 6 games when playing Boston.


but

WAKEFIELD is 36-52 (-20.1 Units) against the money line on the road when the total is 9 to 9.5 since 1997.

[J Shizable]

Looks good. Thx.

[kbsooner21]

Almost played Wakefield. I think Boston with Wakefield at -10 is good value. Minnesota lost eight out of the last ten games. Minnesota is 1-5 SU in its last 6 games when playing Boston.


but

WAKEFIELD is 36-52 (-20.1 Units) against the money line on the road when the total is 9 to 9.5 since 1997.

Yea, and he has an ERA over 6 against Minnesota. Was wondering if that coupled with a late game against the Yanks last night was worth a shot on Minny. Probably should pass.

[insidethe8thpol]

GL sparky

[Udog]

Yea, and he has an ERA over 6 against Minnesota. Was wondering if that coupled with a late game against the Yanks last night was worth a shot on Minny. Probably should pass.

Anybody but Wakefield or Lackey on the mound and it would be Boston on the RL. These two are risky!

[flashypants]

gl pal

[Sirporkie]

Gl

[savage1]

Anybody but Wakefield or Lackey on the mound and it would be Boston on the RL. These two are risky!

The other side of the coin is that if these guys really get lit up and Sox lose, you will be saving money by betting RL.
Also, for obvious reasons if you are going to bet Lackey or Wakefield on RL, bet them on the road rather than at home as the Sox potent offense will get their nine at bats no matter what.