2H baskets

[NoCashMcgraff]

10* Knicks/ Heat UNDER 99

I cannot believe anyone is betting the over here..let alone the majority of the people, are people watching the same game I am lol?

I want to add more to it but it seems too easy

[bryce]

I had under first half---just think the Christmas EVE hangover is OVER!!!
I am a sucker for an over though!!

Good luck Cash!

[bryce]

both teams shooting 39%....does that continue..I am sure this line factored in OT..tight game..

[bryce]

Looking good Cash...bad call on my part!

[NoCashMcgraff]

that was some fucking gas...wow, that was soooo bad

[wayne1218]

With only 78 scored in the 1st half and the 2nd half total set at 99 ... I think they were begging you to go under. That smelled fishy from the start and i think just based on the very high number, the over was the way to go. I didn't see it or play it and i know it is easy to say now but just by reading those numbers, it looked like the under was the sucker bet there. Get'em next time cash!!!

[NoCashMcgraff]

I completely disagree there Wayne..the over was the sucker bet..everyone in america still thinks the knicks are this run and gun team..first half only 78, everyone jumped on the over 2H..barring a 12pt in 35 second screw job vegas takes the cake..
the total for the game was 199, what do you think they were going to put the 2H line at?

[wayne1218]

I completely disagree there Wayne..the over was the sucker bet..everyone in america still thinks the knicks are this run and gun team..first half only 78, everyone jumped on the over 2H..barring a 12pt in 35 second screw job vegas takes the cake..
the total for the game was 199, what do you think they were going to put the 2H line at?

Well, i guess we agree to disagree. I could care less what others are betting. I just know when they score 78 and the total jumps to 99, that tells "Me" a lot. I thought it would be at 90-92. Oh well, we see it differently i guess.

[bryce]

that was some fucking gas...wow, that was soooo bad

Agree CASH---read Wayne's statement as well...

My thought and the way I play over unders second half is according to the original line...OVER was my play because these two teams shot 39 percent first half and scored 78 points which is not bad considering a low scoring half---I just thought these two would do better than the 39 percent in the second half and they did....but it was lucky---CASH you didn't have the right side but believe me---you should have

[bryce]

Well, i guess we agree to disagree. I could care less what others are betting. I just know when they score 78 and the total jumps to 99, that tells "Me" a lot. I thought it would be at 85-90. Oh well, we see it differently i guess.

In College a standard over under is 13 points above what the first half total was if it correlates with the original total.....now if it is a 21-20 game oddmakers make it a lot higher if the total is SAY 150 or whatever.....Not sure how they do Pros....but I would think it would be a bit higher

[NoCashMcgraff]

Well, i guess we agree to disagree. I could care less what others are betting. I just know when they score 78 and the total jumps to 99, that tells "Me" a lot. I thought it would be at 90-92. Oh well, we see it differently i guess.

I have never seen an instance where a game total is 199 and a 2nd half total is 90-92..first half performance does not way that significantly on the 2H line..it may effect it 1 or 2 pts max..since the game total was 199, the first half total was 99.5, the 2H total should have been 99.5..the 2H total was 99, so not much to read there..

regardless of anyones opinions I was picked the wrong side lol..I still think I played the right side, just got unlucky, but it happens.

[wayne1218]

So you are saying the 2nd half total is always 1/2 of the game total no matter what??? I don't agree with that because i've seen many times when that wasn't the case. Now you have me confused! LOL

[NoCashMcgraff]

So you are saying the 2nd half total is always 1/2 of the game total no matter what??? I don't agree with that because i've seen many times when that wasn't the case. Now you have me confused! LOL

definitely not Wayne..you have to take into consideration what the 1H line is..for example if the total was 199 and the 1H total was 105, the 2H total should be AROUND 94...

[tech fan]

Gl buddy

[NoCashMcgraff]

this celtics game is a perfect example for our argument wayne..

the total for the game is 192..the 1H line is 96...if you think the 1H performance has much barring on the 2H line, this game would definitely be an example because the score right now is 27-25 with 4 minutes left...

what I am telling you is, this low scoring affiar in the first will not hold that much weight into the 2H line..the 2H line WILL BE roughly 96pts..give or take a point or two..