Vikings-CARDS Must Read

[dave T]

Don't forget about the world's greatest NFL system going AGAINST the Vikes tonight:

CARDS +3.5

gl,
dave

[roccodean]

Dave, is this the trend? GO AGAINST ANY NFL TEAM THAT SCORED 30 OR MORE POINTS IN EACH OF THEIR LAST TWO GAMES AND ALLOWED 10 OR LESS POINTS IN THOSE SAME TWO GAMES...IF...THEY ARE NOW PLAYING OUTSIDE OF THEIR DIVISION ? Do you have the record?

[dave T]

Yes.

18-1 since 1981
14-1 since 1992
0-1 last year
1-0 this year so far

gl,
dave

[flarendep1]

Dave,

Awesome play, looks like a lock now late in the 3rd!!!

Thanks!!!

[junior]

Thank you

[The Lovedoc]

Good job Dave! Freakin stellar!

[Alafan]

Thanks Dave for an EEEEEEEEEEEEEasy WIN

[moondog22]

Thanks Dave

[elliott one]

Thanks for the play Dave!!

[torom608]

Good job Dave
Thanks

[The Lovedoc]

Yes.

18-1 since 1981
14-1 since 1992
0-1 last year
1-0 this year so far

gl,
dave

Dave, i'm alittle confused.... how is the system different from the other one which is 30-12?

[dave T]

Dave, i'm alittle confused.... how is the system different from the other one which is 30-12?

It's the same system. Originally in 1983 when I first started using it, I went with 30-10. Then one time, I dont' remember when, there was a "near play" in which the team had given up a safety and, therefore, allowed 12 points in one of their two peak games. So, personally, I used 30-12 from there out; broadening the criteria. This is also more useful in the era of the 2-pt conversion where a team might score 11 points. I would "not" recommend using 30-13 as a hard and fast rule, nor would a recommend using 29-10. A double 30-12 is the broadest that I am comfortable with.

Having said all of that, it is rare when it matters anyway since most double peak games are 30-10's.

gl,
dave