Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Truth About Tulsa

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Truth About Tulsa

    I love totals, but I won't touch this one. Tulsa has shown an amazing preponderance for both scoring and giving up scores in bunches, but Ball State hasn't had a single game all season go over 70 points.

    I'll be playing the side, and I'll be on the *recent* underdog. Without getting into too many variables here, I'll try to make this simple.. here is why:

    Tulsa has played 8 games against teams with a final record of 4-8 OR WORSE. Their record in these games is an impressive 8-0. Good teams beat bad teams, and they have done it with HUGE scores. In their 4 games against teams with record of 5-7 or better, they are 1-3. Their lone win against a "quality opponent" came against Rice, but against Arkansas, Houston, and East Carolina, they did not muster nearly the same offensive output.

    I think the public is down on the MAC, down on Ball State after a bizarre (some might say bogus) loss against Buffalo, and playing against the news that the Ball State coach has his bags packed for San Diego State.

    But the truth here is that Tulsa has given up some HUGE days to teams that could throw the ball, and with 26 TDs and 3500 yards passing, Nate Davis can do that. Ball State has an incredibly balanced offensive attack, and Tulsa has basically been very weak against teams with good rushing attacks OR good passing attacks. This probably will be a shootout of sorts, but I'll take the team with better balance, a tougher slate of quality opponents, and somehow getting points.

    People will look at the 42 points that Buffalo threw up on Ball State, but there should be a great many asterisks next to that number, as Nate Davis had two fumbles returned nearly 180 yards for TDs, and I bet he has been aching for a month to make amends for that debacle.

    Good luck.

  • #2
    nice write up good luck buddy

    Comment


    • #3
      good write up----makes sense---and to enhance your presentation, weather may be getting a lil nasty in the second 1/2, towards games end, and I would then Favor Ball St a lil more.....TU is prone to turnovers.....

      Thanks for the post


      Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!

      Comment


      • #4
        good stuff & good luck
        I'll be riding on little ol' Ball St myself - those kids can play

        Comment


        • #5
          Reading through other posts, I really think that WAY too much is being made of the relative weakness of the MAC. Yes, it is a down year for the conference, and the teams (MiamiOH, Bowling Green) who have been strong in recent years were not this year. Winning this conference does not make one a great team. But in the regular season, Ball State quite simply obliterated the competition, winning their conference games by an average of more than 20 points, and winning only once by less than a double digit margin.

          Their loss to Buffalo was catastrophic, and it was insane and improbable. At one point, up 4 points, Ball State went into the end zone for a clear TD that was marked down at the one. For no good reason, replay confirmed the ball at the one, Ball State was clearly visibly pissed off at the ruling, and the next play, Buffalo knocked loose a fumble and took it back 100 yards for a TD. The whole game changed.

          I would take Navy straight up against any team in Conference USA, and Ball State dispatched of them handily as well. Of the other 4 bowl eligible teams in Conference USA, Tulsa only had to face 2 of them, and they went 1-1 in those games. Yes, the MAC was not a powerhouse this season, but the best team was FAR better than the rest.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by TruckeeT View Post
            Reading through other posts, I really think that WAY too much is being made of the relative weakness of the MAC. Yes, it is a down year for the conference, and the teams (MiamiOH, Bowling Green) who have been strong in recent years were not this year. Winning this conference does not make one a great team. But in the regular season, Ball State quite simply obliterated the competition, winning their conference games by an average of more than 20 points, and winning only once by less than a double digit margin.

            Their loss to Buffalo was catastrophic, and it was insane and improbable. At one point, up 4 points, Ball State went into the end zone for a clear TD that was marked down at the one. For no good reason, replay confirmed the ball at the one, Ball State was clearly visibly pissed off at the ruling, and the next play, Buffalo knocked loose a fumble and took it back 100 yards for a TD. The whole game changed.

            I would take Navy straight up against any team in Conference USA, and Ball State dispatched of them handily as well. Of the other 4 bowl eligible teams in Conference USA, Tulsa only had to face 2 of them, and they went 1-1 in those games. Yes, the MAC was not a powerhouse this season, but the best team was FAR better than the rest.
            I like your opinion, but think the Mac Conference has shown how bad they really are by their Bowl Games Loses. 0-4 so far.

            Comment


            • #7
              I agree MAC has looked bad in bowl games. I'm just saying that when you have a team that has played its season at a level FAR above the rest of the conference, saying that Ball State is going to lose to Tulsa because W Michigan got blown out is like saying the Arizona Cardinals don't stand a chance in the playoffs because the Rams suck.

              Comment

              Working...
              X