Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2nd half plays

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by NEJAKE View Post
    maybe I should start playing all halftime wagers! 6-0

    only bet 2 of them tho!
    LOL.

    Nice work!!

    Comment


    • #17
      Already looking at Houston

      Comment


      • #18
        OV in Washington game

        Comment


        • #19
          Houston -4 2nd hf

          Comment


          • #20
            Hey thai I know weazel has a good angle that typically works...go against what the posted side or total was so that you are not trying to get towards it....for example:

            Side:

            Chicago was -10 losing by 7 at half take the other team to continue doing what they are doing and not the losing team to come back...

            Total:

            A total of lets say 46.5 only has like 10 points at half...take the 2nd half UNDER as typically the teams will continue doing what they have been doing....

            This is what I a have come to realize over the years....because 2nd half oddsmakers know these things and inflate lines in favor of the opposite of what I just said...square bettors would say things like.."This team was a 10 point fav losing by 10 at half I am gonna take them to come back"....or "this total was really high and both teams arent scoring I am gonna take the offense to turn it around and start scorng in the 2nd half"....go against the grain I swear it seems to works in the long run....value in the 2nd half lines are definately beneficial do to this..

            JMHO...GL!!!
            Last edited by Chado1; 10-19-2008, 06:27 PM.
            SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Chado1 View Post
              Hey thai I know weazel has a good angle that typically works...go against what the posted side or total was so that you are not trying to get towards it....for example:

              Side:

              Chicago was -10 losing by 7 at half take the other team to continue doing what they are doing and not the losing team to come back...

              Total:

              A total of lets say 46.5 only has like 10 points at half...take the 2nd half UNDER as typically the teams will continue doing what they have been doing....

              This is what I a have come to realize over the years....because 2nd half oddsmakers know these things and inflate lines in favor of the opposite of what I just said...square bettors would say things like.."This team was a 10 point fav losing by 10 at half I am gonna take them to come back"....or "this total was really high and both teams arent scoring I am gonna take the offense to turn it around and start scorng in the 2nd half"....go against the grain I swear it seems to works in the long run....value in the 2nd half lines are definately beneficial do to this..

              JMHO...GL!!!

              Thanks buddy.

              So Wash/Cleve over is the play.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by thaikarate1 View Post
                Thanks buddy.

                So Wash/Cleve over is the play.
                No it would be under...not chasing the original total and going against the grain...figuring the teams will continue to do what they have been doing...bvasically fading the obvious because the oddsmakers will have an infaleted line on the 2nd over/under total....never any value going what seems right with the line inflation to subsequent it....
                SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Chado1 View Post
                  No it would be under...not chasing the original total and going against the grain...figuring the teams will continue to do what they have been doing...bvasically fading the obvious because the oddsmakers will have an infaleted line on the 2nd over/under total....never any value going what seems right with the line inflation to subsequent it....
                  Ah, Got it!!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X