Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New rule change in NFL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New rule change in NFL

    No more force-out calls for NFL receivers

    When push comes to shove, NFL receivers had better have their feet inbounds this season.In a rule change that should be popular with defensive backs, a receiver must have both feet inbounds for a completion — even if he is being knocked out of bounds while trying to do so. Officials no longer have to make the judgment call of whether the receiver would have landed inbounds had he not been hit.

    "We've been looking at it closely for the last two years," said Mike Pereira, the NFL's vice president of officiating. "It's a difficult call because it forces the officials to judge, one, would he have come down inbounds? Two, was the contact overt enough — was the defensive back shoving the receiver out of bounds, or legitimately trying to intercept the pass? And three, did the receiver hold onto the ball?"

    Team owners, who voted in favor of eliminating force outs at their annual meeting in March, also decreed that defenders must have both feet inbounds for a successful interception. Force-out calls are rare, but they can be game-changing. There were 18 of them last season, and, by the league's count, five were called incorrectly by the official on the field. The plays are not eligible to be reviewed on instant replay.

    Former Dallas Cowboys star Michael Irvin thinks the new rule could cause some teams to adjust their offensive strategies, particularly in passing situations.

    "It used to be that I could tap in, make sure I get in, even if it's high I can go up and get it," Irvin said. "And the defensive back had to give me the right to come down inbounds. Now, without that, the sideline becomes like another defensive back. Now I've got to be thinking about staying away from that on third and eight, third and nine. That means guys have to go inside more and try to make those plays.''

    Source: Los Angeles Times
    NFL System - Year 1
    Week 2 3-2 +0.8 Units
    Week 3 3-2-1 +0.8 Units
    Week 3 3-3 -0.3 Units
    Week 4 3-2 +0.8 Units
    Week 5 2-3 -1.3 Units
    Week 6 4-1 +2.9 Units
    Week 7 3-0 +3.0 Units
    Week 8 2-3 -2.35 Units
    Week 9 0-1 -1.1 Units
    Season Total 23-17 +3.35 Units

  • #2
    I like the rule change. I'd like to see them take it a step further (no pun intended). Adopt the NCAA rule. Require the receive to have only one foot inbounds.

    Comment


    • #3
      That would make the rule better I think. If it were installed on plays that would not result in touchdowns only though. I think for touchdown plays it would be better to seperate the NFL from NCAA by keeping the two feet in bounds rule. It shows that more skill is required to take it to the next level.
      NFL System - Year 1
      Week 2 3-2 +0.8 Units
      Week 3 3-2-1 +0.8 Units
      Week 3 3-3 -0.3 Units
      Week 4 3-2 +0.8 Units
      Week 5 2-3 -1.3 Units
      Week 6 4-1 +2.9 Units
      Week 7 3-0 +3.0 Units
      Week 8 2-3 -2.35 Units
      Week 9 0-1 -1.1 Units
      Season Total 23-17 +3.35 Units

      Comment


      • #4
        Interesting rule change and thanks for the info..
        SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

        Comment


        • #5
          So if a receiver is going up for the ball the defender can knock him out of bounds and its incomplete? If so you will see a lot more of that happening in crucial situations.

          Comment


          • #6
            what a stupid fuckin rule. the nfl makes it tough enough to call something a catch to begin with, now this.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by molta02
              what a stupid fuckin rule. the nfl makes it tough enough to call something a catch to begin with, now this.
              I'm confused? The rule makes it easier to call. It eliminates the forced out judgment call.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by frankb03
                I'm confused? The rule makes it easier to call. It eliminates the forced out judgment call.

                right, but they overturn so many catches now because of 'ball was moving', both feet in but no possession, etc.

                this adds another reason to NOT call something a catch.



                if they want this rule, then at least have the ncaa rule of one foot, not twoo.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I wonder if this is gonna create more P.I. calls with defenders pushing the receiver out of bounds to avoid getting both feet in...theres another angle to look at too...I have to agree with molta here....dont like the rule and only if P.I.'s are called or the adopt only one foot in bounds rule...
                  SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Chado1
                    I wonder if this is gonna create more P.I. calls with defenders pushing the receiver out of bounds to avoid getting both feet in...theres another angle to look at too...I have to agree with molta here....dont like the rule and only if P.I.'s are called or the adopt only one foot in bounds rule...


                    You think they pushed " less harder " knowing the receiver only needed one foot in bounds .... won't change anything from a D-backs perspective bud....they will drill you any chance they get! atleast that's how i did it !

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by BettorsChat
                      So if a receiver is going up for the ball the defender can knock him out of bounds and its incomplete? If so you will see a lot more of that happening in crucial situations.
                      Yeah I think its a pretty crucial rule change, quarterbacks will have to keep the ball down especially in late game situation.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X