Am I the only one that feels this whole Spygate thing has been blown out of proportion?
How much of an advantage did it really give the Pats? Think about it. They taped the teams defensive signals. If it was such a huge advantage why didn't they blow out the Rams, Panthers and Eagles in their previous Superbowls.
Now there's allegations they taped the Rams practice the day prior to their Superbowl. What did they gain? They have game film from the Rams previous 18 games. Is a walk-thru practice going to reveal more than game tape. You still have to make the plays on the field. They barely beat the Raiders. Then beat Steelers by 7 to play in their first SB.
As the thread title suggests. Maybe I'm naive. Can someone enlighten me?
How much of an advantage did it really give the Pats? Think about it. They taped the teams defensive signals. If it was such a huge advantage why didn't they blow out the Rams, Panthers and Eagles in their previous Superbowls.
Now there's allegations they taped the Rams practice the day prior to their Superbowl. What did they gain? They have game film from the Rams previous 18 games. Is a walk-thru practice going to reveal more than game tape. You still have to make the plays on the field. They barely beat the Raiders. Then beat Steelers by 7 to play in their first SB.
As the thread title suggests. Maybe I'm naive. Can someone enlighten me?
Comment