Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

**Super Bowl Info**

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    **Super Bowl Info**

    Been traveling a bunch and thought I might belly up to the table with a thread that would encourage your facts not your opinion of who covers in the Super Bowl. Lets use info gathered from other areas to see if we can as a group pick the correct total and/or side.

    First off- we never know where we are unless we know where we have been! So lets look at the past.

    Super Bowl History (Scores + ATS results)
    1st 41 Super Bowls results ATS
    Favorites covering - 21
    Dogs covering - 17
    Pushed - 3
    I might add that double digit favs are 7-5 ATS

    YEAR SUPER BOWL TEAMS (NFC v. AFC) SPREAD FINAL WINNER COVER
    66-67 I GB vs. KC GB -17 35-10 GB GB (-17)
    67-68 II GB vs. OAK GB -13 33-14 GB GB (-13)
    68-69 III BAL vs. NYJ BAL -17 16-7 NYJ NYJ (+17)
    69-70 IV MIN vs. KC MIN -10 23-7 KC KC (+10)
    70-71 V DAL vs. BAL DAL -1 16-13 BAL BAL (+1)
    71-72 VI DAL vs. MIA DAL -5 24-3 DAL DAL (-5)
    72-73 VII WAS vs. MIA WAS -2 14-7 MIA MIA (+2)
    73-74 VIII MIN vs. MIA MIA -6 24-7 MIA MIA (-6)
    74-75 IX MIN vs. PIT PIT -3 16-6 PIT PIT (-3)
    75-76 X DAL vs. PIT PIT -7 21-17 PIT DAL (+7)
    76-77 XI MIN vs. OAK OAK -5 32-14 OAK OAK (-5)
    77-78 XII DAL vs. DEN DAL -5 27-10 DAL DAL (-5)
    78-79 XIII DAL vs. PIT PIT -4 35-31 PIT PUSH
    79-80 XIV LA vs. PIT PIT -11 31-19 PIT PIT (-11)
    80-81 XV PHI vs. OAK PHI -3 27-10 OAK OAK (+3)
    81-82 XVI SF vs. CIN SF -2 26-21 SF SF (-2)
    82-83 XVII WAS vs. MIA MIA -2 27-17 WAS WAS (+2)
    83-84 XVIII WAS vs. OAK WAS -3 38-9 OAK OAK (+3)
    84-85 XIX SF vs. MIA SF -3 38-16 SF SF (-3)
    85-86 XX CHI vs. NE CHI -11 46-10 CHI CHI (-11)
    86-87 XXI NYG vs. DEN NYG -9 39-20 NYG NYG (-9)
    87-88 XXII WAS vs. DEN DEN -3 42-10 WAS WAS (+3)
    88-89 XXIII SF vs. CIN SF -7 20-16 SF CIN (+7)
    89-90 XXIV SF vs. DEN SF -12 55-10 SF SF (-12)
    90-91 XXV NYG vs. BUF BUF -7 20-19 NYG NYG (+7)
    91-92 XXVI WAS vs. BUF WAS -7 37-24 WAS WAS (-7)
    92-93 XXVII DAL vs. BUF DAL -6.5 52-17 DAL DAL (-6.5)
    93-94 XXVIII DAL vs. BUF DAL -10.5 30-13 DAL DAL (-10.5)
    94-95 XXIX SF vs. SD SF -18 49-26 SF SF (-18)
    95-96 X X X DAL vs. PIT DAL -13.5 27-17 DAL PIT (+13.5)
    96-97 XXXI GB vs. NE GB -14 35-21 GB PUSH
    97-98 XXXII GB vs. DEN GB -12 31-24 DEN DEN (+12)
    98-99 XXXIII ATL vs. DEN DEN -7.5 34-19 DEN DEN (-7.5)
    99-00 XXXIV STL vs. TEN STL -7 23-16 STL PUSH
    00-01 XXXV NYG vs. BAL BAL -3 34-7 BAL BAL (-3)
    01-02 XXXVI STL vs. NE STL -14 20-17 NE NE (+14)
    02-03 XXXVII TB vs. OAK OAK -3.5 48-21 TB TB (+3.5)
    03-04 XXXVIII CAR vs. NE NE -7 32-29 NE CAR (+7)
    04-05 XXXIX PHI vs. NE NE -4 24-21 NE PHI (+4)
    05-06 XL SEA vs. PIT PIT -4 21-10 PIT PIT (-4)
    06-07 XLI CHI vs. IND IND -7 29-17 IND IND (-7)
    07-08 XLII NYG vs. NE NE -14 --- --- ---
    Last edited by Spearit; 01-27-2008, 11:17 AM.
    "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Spearit

    thanks once again my man....

    69-70 IV MIN vs. KC MIN -10 23-7 KC KC (+10)

    this is the "Most" memorable one for me, in regards to being on Top.....money wise

    I was going around Taking KC on the ML, with odds of course, and also hit a $1000.00 pool, 1 winner, final score.....that was a lots of money in those days.......

    actually was the year, that gave me regards as a "good capper" in my home town, and would go to local bars, and they would all ask my opinion.....I was hooked from there.....

    started a mini-reputation as a person who could "pick em"....know what I mean Verne....

    once gain thanks---for the info......
    Last edited by Kaptain; 01-27-2008, 11:38 AM.


    Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!

    Comment

    • #3
      Thanx for sharing Kapt- great story and moment.

      The public is on NY to cover and the Under!

      Lets look at some trends with this.
      The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NY GIANTS games 63.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (24-14)

      The Under favors New England and does not favor the Giants.
      This simply indicates that those folks on New England totals hit on these totals concerning NE 63.2 % of the time. Giants total fans are not so lucky.

      All games in this series since 1992
      NY GIANTS is 3-1 against the spread versus NEW ENGLAND since 1992
      NEW ENGLAND is 4-0 straight up against NY GIANTS since 1992
      2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1992

      Games over the last 3 seasons
      NY GIANTS is 1-0 against the spread versus NEW ENGLAND over the last 3 seasons
      NEW ENGLAND is 1-0 straight up against NY GIANTS over the last 3 seasons
      1 of 1 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons
      Last edited by Spearit; 01-27-2008, 11:47 AM.
      "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

      Comment

      • #4
        Key Player Injuries

        NY GIANTS
        WR Sinorice Moss Prob Sun - Back - 01/08/08
        C Shaun O'Hara Ques Sun - Knee - 01/08/08
        CB Sam Madison Ques Sun - Abdominal - 01/08/08
        DT Jay Alford Ques Sun - Knee - 01/08/08
        OL Gerris Wilkinson Ques Sun - Knee - 01/08/08
        S Craig Dahl I-R - Knee - 12/30/07
        TE Jeremy Shockey I-R - Leg - 12/17/07
        RB Derrick Ward I-R - Leg - 12/02/07
        DE Mathias Kiwanuka I-R - Leg - 11/18/07
        DE Adrian Awasom I-R - Back - 09/17/07
        DT William Joseph I-R - Back - 09/11/07
        NT Marcus Bell I-R - Knee - 08/27/07
        RB Robert Douglas I-R - Knee - 08/27/07
        LS Ryan Kuehl I-R - Leg - 08/04/07
        FB Jim Finn I-R - Shoulder - 06/13/07

        NEW ENGLAND
        TE Kyle Brady Prob Sat - Ankle - 01/08/08
        G Stephen Neal Prob Sat - Shoulder - 01/08/08
        FB Kyle Eckel Ques Sat - Chest - 01/08/08
        DE Mike Wright I-R - Foot - 12/13/07
        LB Rosevelt Colvin I-R - Foot - 11/25/07
        FB Sammy Morris I-R - Chest - 11/02/07
        TE David Thomas I-R - Leg - 10/01/07
        LB Oscar Lua I-R - Knee - 08/31/07
        CB Mike Richardson I-R - Arm - 08/28/07
        RB Justise Hairston I-R - Hamstring - 08/01/07
        CB Chad Scott I-R - Knee - 07/31/07
        "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

        Comment

        • #5
          NY is 13-6 ATS NE is 10-8 ATS (Mostly all in the early part of the season did they win handily.

          Totals reveal 9-10 for NY and 10-6-1 for New England which kind of contradicts what I mentioned earlier about NE was better suited for the Under. That was misleading as it was the public perception on NE's Total whether it was Over or Under is what should be brought out.
          Last edited by Spearit; 01-27-2008, 11:53 AM.
          "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

          Comment

          • #6
            Thanks for the info Spear, nice to see you around, and good luck on Super Sunday!!!
            SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

            Comment

            • #7
              "The underdog usually has the edge in the first quarter, as they are flying around and going full tilt from the opening kickoff. The underdog has not trailed in the last six Super Bowls. A better indication of the eventual outcome would be the halftime score. Here the team winning or tied after 30 minutes has gone on to win 21 of the last 24 Lombardi Trophies’. Additionally, these 21 winners are 15-4-2 ATS for game.

              "In looking back as the 21 halftime leaders that went on to win. Playing oddsmaker based on opening line vs adjusted line for score, what I would figure is the team leading at halftime that went on to win the Super Bowl was 13-8, 61.9 percent in covering the second half spread.

              New England is 1-8 ATS off a home no-cover where the team won as a favorite, with the Giants 9-2 ATS away from Giants Stadium this season. It’s interesting to note only twice in the last 20 years has a team that won the Super Bowl failed to cover the ATS in the Conference Championship contest."

              -My conclusion-------------
              This would show to take NY for the 1st Qtr.
              NE for the 2nd Qtr.
              Whoever is winning the first half - take for the 2nd half.
              "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

              Comment

              • #8
                Last few years the "public" money has been correct.

                Colts last year
                Seahawks before that

                So, the fact that there was a lot of public money early on NYG shouldnt deter bettors.

                Comment

                • #9
                  seahawks did not cover my man

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Thanks Spearit

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Thanks Spearit

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        NY for the 1st Qtr. ------------------------Whewwww Easy Winner!

                        NE for the 2nd Qtr.
                        Whoever is winning the first half - take for the 2nd half.
                        "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Nice buddy!!

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Thanx Bryce!
                            NY for the 1st Qtr. ------------------------------- Winner
                            NE 2nd Qtr----------------------------------------Winner

                            NE ------------------2nd Half---------------------Pending
                            "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...
                            X