Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Early Thoughts On NFL Week 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK
    so far i'm loving the bears and the saints
    I'm liking the Saints too

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Spiccoli
      I like San Diego to roll Green Bay. We'll see. Got to add Philly at home at 0-2 versus 2-0 Lions. Philly loses that and they can forget the playoffs. Chicago will shut down Dallas IMO. Big time.
      The Cowboys/Bears is interesting. Grossman is so bad, the Cowboys weak spot, CB, shouldn't be exploited. I think the Cowboys can win that game.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BigWeiner
        The Cowboys/Bears is interesting. Grossman is so bad, the Cowboys weak spot, CB, shouldn't be exploited. I think the Cowboys can win that game.
        The under 41 looks real good IMO...should definately be a low scoring game with Grossman going against a good defense and we all know how good the Bears D is.....both teams should have trouble scoring IMO....
        SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by molta02
          the pats might play possum in this game. bellichek has a nack for doing that.
          I know it's only week 3, but the Patriots look much better than last year and the Bills look much worse than last, and rightfully so, the Bills lost tons of players, and the Patriots picked up tons of players. The Patriots could easily blow them out, just like they did the Chargers, no way would I take the points, and I might just lay them. 30-10 final.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Chado1
            The under 41 looks real good IMO...should definately be a low scoring game with Grossman going against a good defense and we all know how good the Bears D is.....both teams should have trouble scoring IMO....
            I think the game goes over. The Bears tend to go over with high scoring teams and stay under with low scoring teams IMO.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by BigWeiner
              I know it's only week 3, but the Patriots look much better than last year and the Bills look much worse than last, and rightfully so, the Bills lost tons of players, and the Patriots picked up tons of players. The Patriots could easily blow them out, just like they did the Chargers, no way would I take the points, and I might just lay them. 30-10 final.
              Either the Pats just play the typical NFL "play to not lose" type game or they bow them out cause Buffalo should have trouble scoring too....I think I am gonna stay far away from this game.....
              SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by bwade210
                Cards +9 and JAX +3'.....hit them now!
                Cards +9 looks good, Ravens never blow anybody out

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BigWeiner
                  Cards +9 looks good, Ravens never blow anybody out
                  Yea that Cards +9 stood out right away to me...way too many points for a bad offensive team IMO.....
                  SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Houston has a whole new attitude, and they are starting to believe. They will put forth extreme effort Sunday, and covered both Colts games last year, including winning SU in Week 16.

                    That said, Andre Johnson is a HUGE part of the offense, and I wonder about the depth at WR. People forget that #80 went to the last two Pro Bowls, as well as leading the NFL in receptions a year ago.

                    I think it would have been a great game with a healthy Johnson, possibly even a Texans win, but w/o him, I think Colts cover in a hard-fought battle.
                    You can't always get what you want, but if you try some time, you might find, you get what you need.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by GrandPa
                      Houston has a whole new attitude, and they are starting to believe. They will put forth extreme effort Sunday, and covered both Colts games last year, including winning SU in Week 16.

                      That said, Andre Johnson is a HUGE part of the offense, and I wonder about the depth at WR. People forget that #80 went to the last two Pro Bowls, as well as leading the NFL in receptions a year ago.

                      I think it would have been a great game with a healthy Johnson, possibly even a Texans win, but w/o him, I think Colts cover in a hard-fought battle.
                      Andre Johnson is a huge lose, I don't think their other receivers can make up for that.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by BigWeiner
                        Andre Johnson is a huge lose, I don't think their other receivers can make up for that.
                        Yea that is huge...dont think the Texans can outscore Indy without him....

                        I remember last year the Texans played Indy tough both times and covered both times, winning one outright....but both games they had Andre Johnson so.....
                        SOBER SINCE MARCH 28TH OF 2007!!!

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          wayne1218

                          Originally posted by wayne1218
                          N.E. -16.5

                          Wtf???


                          Buffalo looks awfully tempting don't they??
                          looks to me like Buffalo is good TEASER Material with another team you like.....IMO


                          Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X