A trend I've noticed, and it's not too late

[GrandPa]

I haven't posted any of these plays, but I have seen a healthy tendency in these first round games, or teams playing in their first tourney game ( bye in 1st round) for the unders to come in , or more specifically , the FIRST HALVES UNDERS. Chalk it up to nerves or jitters, or just plain tentativeness, but there seems to be some merit to this theory.

If you look up the box scores on all of the games so far , ou will see what I mean.

Last night I played
WAS Under 58 1H W
Cal-Northridge Under 66.5 1H W

Today, so far, I have played:
Rice/UCF Under 63.5 1H W
ND/Syr Under 70.5 1H W
Md/Mia Under 69.5 1H W


Pending

[812] 1H PITTSBURGH u61½-110
[818] 1H MASSACHUSETTS u60-110
[856] 1H AUBURN u67½-110
[866] 1H TULANE u61½-110
[846] 1H TEXAS TECH u68-110

It may be a flash-in-the-pan, but it has worked well so far. I borrow so much from this site and its awesome members that I would be remiss not to mention my findings.

GL all

[Kaptain]

thanks for sharing GrandPa----you just might have something there....kapt

[beerball101]

nice pops , thanks !

bol on the rest ! hope ya hit!

[GrandPa]

1H TEXAS TECH u68-110 (L)

The posting curse is alive and well, with a flurry of late 1H points

DAMMIT

[GrandPa]

[818] 1H MASSACHUSETTS u60-110 W

[beerball101]

keep rolling pops! wish i could play 856

[GrandPa]

I have not compiled the data, but at first glance, it appears to come in UNDER at about a 2:1 ratio.

Possible reasons could be:

1)No stupid fouling at the end of the half to give a false OVER

2) Running set plays as designed in preparation

3) Nerves, or jitters for first game

4) Bright lights, big city

5) Getting used to depth perception

6) Fear of LOSING

[Dat Boi E]

good luck on tha undies, G~Pa!

[beerball101]

just flipped channel pops1

no defense in 856 ..so far!

shit happens !hope ya hit. get!

[SharkinthePool]

I haven't posted any of these plays, but I have seen a healthy tendency in these first round games, or teams playing in their first tourney game ( bye in 1st round) for the unders to come in , or more specifically , the FIRST HALVES UNDERS. Chalk it up to nerves or jitters, or just plain tentativeness, but there seems to be some merit to this theory.

If you look up the box scores on all of the games so far , ou will see what I mean.

Last night I played
WAS Under 58 1H W
Cal-Northridge Under 66.5 1H W

Today, so far, I have played:
Rice/UCF Under 63.5 1H W
ND/Syr Under 70.5 1H W
Md/Mia Under 69.5 1H W


Pending

[812] 1H PITTSBURGH u61½-110
[818] 1H MASSACHUSETTS u60-110
[856] 1H AUBURN u67½-110
[866] 1H TULANE u61½-110
[846] 1H TEXAS TECH u68-110

It may be a flash-in-the-pan, but it has worked well so far. I borrow so much from this site and its awesome members that I would be remiss not to mention my findings.

GL all

JMO, I like to play alot of unders in 1sth just because of no fouling at the end of half like usually in 2ndh...Also teams are a little jittery and nerves play a factor.. However sometimes you have to consider how good of team(s) Offensively that are playing... Just my 2 cents...But I do play alot of unders in NBA and NCAA on half bets...