Most days Sportsbook sends me a write up on a "Game of the day". Obviously they are trying to bring more money in on a certain side.
Here is how they have done since last Monday
1/1 - Tessessee (Lost)
1/2 - Wake Forest (Lost)
1/3 - Notre Dame (Lost)
1/4,1/5 - No e-mail from them
1/6 - Seattle (Lost)
1/7 - Phily (Lost)
Here is tonight's write up.......
"Out of 24 combined games, these two teams covered the UNDER 17 times. Florida's defense only allows 13.5 PPG whereas OSU allows a mere 10.4 PPG. In non-conference games, Florida covered the UNDER 8 out of 9 times over the last three seasons. In their 13 bowl games since '92, OSU covered the OVER just four times. When playing after two or more weeks rest, OSU has covered the OVER only 7 out of 22 times since '92. With their dominant defenses and all of the UNDER trends, it is a little surprising that only 14% of the early money is on the UNDER."
They have me convinced that this game will blow up tonight. As they seem to be great fade material.
I will definitely throw something on the over 46.5
Here is how they have done since last Monday
1/1 - Tessessee (Lost)
1/2 - Wake Forest (Lost)
1/3 - Notre Dame (Lost)
1/4,1/5 - No e-mail from them
1/6 - Seattle (Lost)
1/7 - Phily (Lost)
Here is tonight's write up.......
"Out of 24 combined games, these two teams covered the UNDER 17 times. Florida's defense only allows 13.5 PPG whereas OSU allows a mere 10.4 PPG. In non-conference games, Florida covered the UNDER 8 out of 9 times over the last three seasons. In their 13 bowl games since '92, OSU covered the OVER just four times. When playing after two or more weeks rest, OSU has covered the OVER only 7 out of 22 times since '92. With their dominant defenses and all of the UNDER trends, it is a little surprising that only 14% of the early money is on the UNDER."
They have me convinced that this game will blow up tonight. As they seem to be great fade material.
I will definitely throw something on the over 46.5
Comment