could have something there JT----I feel Wake will give em hell in the first 1/2, then Louisville will figure out their defensive schemes and weaknesses, exploit em in the second 1/2, and cover.....Thus I like Wake + in first 1/2, and Louis - for the game....
But with that said, if Wakes D is for real, they could pull it off, I just don't think they've faced an offense like this one before....kapt
could have something there JT----I feel Wake will give em hell in the first 1/2, then Louisville will figure out their defensive schemes and weaknesses, exploit em in the second 1/2, and cover.....Thus I like Wake + in first 1/2, and Louis - for the game....
But with that said, if Wakes D is for real, they could pull it off, I just don't think they've faced an offense like this one before....kapt
Kaptain,
You know I love your thinking.
I mentioned earlier that first half dogs have gone 13-2 the past 3 days, including 6-0 yesterday. In addition to this years run, last year bowl games played January 1 and after, first half underdogs went 7-1. That makes an interesting trend that includes your synopsis above. The superior team may be slow to start, but quick to finish.
In earlier bowl games, the above trend is almost reversed, but given the talent, technology, staffing, etc that these bigger schools have, the first halves should be relatively close. Factor in line mistakes, public perception, etc, to me there is value in these plays.
After saying that, the "due factor" theory is bound to catch up sooner or later. Will tonight be the night? I say no, but this is why I have a different job than a professional handicapper.
Good luck JT, I think I may have been rude by mentioning all of this in your thread. My bad, I just now realized it. Good Luck to you, and again, I apologize.
Comment