Ace-Ace HUUUUUGGEE EARLY PLAY---FOR THE FADERS

[frankb03]

"With the number one pick, the Oakland Raiders pick..."

Select Troy Smith

[Chado1]

Love to fade this guy but I think he is on the right side here!!!

I will be taking KC no matter what, retards will take the worst team in football, just like vs the Rams!!!

The only way this bet will lose is if the Raiders get a back-door cover and lose by 3 or some BS!!!

[BigWeiner]

I'm taking the Chiefs

[DAREALDEAL]

how can you trust somebody with that English anyway?


this dude might be osama been hatin'

[GOLDENGREEK]

Love to fade this guy but I think he is on the right side here!!!

I will be taking KC no matter what, retards will take the worst team in football, just like vs the Rams!!!

The only way this bet will lose is if the Raiders get a back-door cover and lose by 3 or some BS!!!

If you still have yesterdays paper look at the box score in that game:

First downs:

Oakland-20
St louis -16

total yards:

oakland-260
st louis-251

The diffrence was tournovers
oakland 5
st louis 0

you cant handicapp tournovers.

And yeah, I was one of those retards who had Oakland this past sunday

[GOLDENGREEK]

Raiders are bad. However they 6-8 ATS and 3-4 ATS at home. The Chiefs are also 6-8 ATS

Chiefs are the better team but they struggle on the road. They squeeked by a bad Arizona squad. They were blown out early in the season by a struggling Steelers team and lost a few weeks ago vs a lousy Browns team blowing a 2 TD lead in the 4th. Chiefs are 0-2 ATS on the road.

I would trust a conservative Herm Edwards laying 6.5 on the road.

Dis you mean to sy you wouldnt trust HERM?

[frankb03]

[/B]

Dis you mean to sy you wouldnt trust HERM?

Yes. Thanks

I would NOT TRUST Herm.

[Chado1]

If you still have yesterdays paper look at the box score in that game:

First downs:

Oakland-20
St louis -16

total yards:

oakland-260
st louis-251

The diffrence was tournovers
oakland 5
st louis 0

you cant handicapp tournovers.

And yeah, I was one of those retards who had Oakland this past sunday

I know you can't handicapp turnovers but that's what you get for betting on the worst team in football who has now lost 7 in a row, what did you expect??? a win??? LMFAO yea right

[Chado1]

I cashed in nicely with the Rams!!!

Didn't even take the points.......

took Rams ML (+130)

RAIDERS BLOW!!!!

[dirtymike]

For once I'm actually on the same side as Ace. Raiders suck!

[frankb03]

I will be taking KC no matter what, retards will take the worst team in football, just like vs the Rams!!!

The only way this bet will lose is if the Raiders get a back-door cover and lose by 3 or some BS!!!

I guess I'm a retard because I'll probably be taking Oakland.

I guess I was a retard when I took the Raiders vs. Denver (twice) and SD. (can document 2 of the 3)

I was definitely a retard when I also took Oakland vs. Houston.

BTW, Oakland has covered 3 straight as a home dog. Winning 2 SU including on as a 9 point dog.

[frankb03]

I know you can't handicapp turnovers but that's what you get for betting on the worst team in football who has now lost 7 in a row, what did you expect??? a win??? LMFAO yea right

You have tunnel vision. So what they're the worst team in football. Do you only bet good team? If you do you'll lose. Raiders might be 2-12 but they have the same ATS record as KC. For me that's the record that matters.

Raiders have lost 7 straight? So what. Losers of 7 straight off a good betting situation especially as home dogs. More so if their opponent is off a loss. Home dogs (Raiders) off 7 straight losses are 14-4 ATS vs an opponent (Chiefs) off a loss. They are 7-1 ATS and 5-3 SU vs an opponent off 2 losses. 4-0 ATS and 3-1 SU vs an opponent off 3 losses. KC hasn't been very impressive of late.

This retard will put my money on Oakland before I'd lay a TD for a road favorite with an average overrated team that has nothing to play for.

What's the past history for 7-7 road favorites?

0-7 SU A 7-7 road favorite has NEVER won a game dating back to 1989.

GL with KC

[GOLDENGREEK]

You have tunnel vision. So what they're the worst team in football. Do you only bet good team? If you do you'll lose. Raiders might be 2-12 but they have the same ATS record as KC. For me that's the record that matters.

Raiders have lost 7 straight? So what. Losers of 7 straight off a good betting situation especially as home dogs. More so if their opponent is off a loss. Home dogs (Raiders) off 7 straight losses are 14-4 ATS vs an opponent (Chiefs) off a loss. They are 7-1 ATS and 5-3 SU vs an opponent off 2 losses. 4-0 ATS and 3-1 SU vs an opponent off 3 losses. KC hasn't been very impressive of late.

This retard will put my money on Oakland before I'd lay a TD for a road favorite with an average overrated team that has nothing to play for.

What's the past history for 7-7 road favorites?

0-7 SU A 7-7 road favorite has NEVER won a game dating back to 1989.

GL with KC

And with that you just convinced me to pull the trigger on oakland!!

[scla99]

Me too. Well lets go Raiders!!!!

[MtrCtyPimp]

You have tunnel vision. So what they're the worst team in football. Do you only bet good team? If you do you'll lose. Raiders might be 2-12 but they have the same ATS record as KC. For me that's the record that matters.

Raiders have lost 7 straight? So what. Losers of 7 straight off a good betting situation especially as home dogs. More so if their opponent is off a loss. Home dogs (Raiders) off 7 straight losses are 14-4 ATS vs an opponent (Chiefs) off a loss. They are 7-1 ATS and 5-3 SU vs an opponent off 2 losses. 4-0 ATS and 3-1 SU vs an opponent off 3 losses. KC hasn't been very impressive of late.

This retard will put my money on Oakland before I'd lay a TD for a road favorite with an average overrated team that has nothing to play for.

What's the past history for 7-7 road favorites?

0-7 SU A 7-7 road favorite has NEVER won a game dating back to 1989.

GL with KC

God bless you Frank....keepin things in line

PEACE