Tweet
Preview 2003
ACC Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T1. Florida State (6-2 in conference, 7-5 overall) - Offense: Being Florida State, there are athletes and players with raw
talent that most programs can only dream about. The question is whether or not this crew can use all this talent to form a
devastating offense. The quarterback situation is fine, but Chris Rix could be running for his life behind an inexperienced
line with no depth. The running backs could be outstanding if Greg Jones is healthy again. Defense: Eleven starters (ten if
you don't count Darnell Dockett) return and 26 lettermen will be in the mix for an experienced defense that got better and
better as last season went on. There aren't any monsters on the defensive line other than Dockett, but the linebacking corps
is more than good enough to pick up the slack. The secondary is experienced, but it has to be far better than it was last
year. With at least eight good players to choose from, Mickey Andrews will find the right mix.
T1. Maryland (6-2, 10-2) - Offense: The offense could be even better than its been over the last two years, but it can't
afford any injuries. There's little depth at quarterback and on the line, but the starters are extremely talented. The
receiving corps is big and explosive, but the offense will revolve around the running game led by Bruce Perry and Josh Allen.
Defense: The back eight should be among the best in America. The secondary returns intact to go along the experienced
linebacking corps. The line is bit of a problem with little developed depth and needing C.J. Feldheim to return from a knee
injury.
T1. North Carolina State (6-2, 9-3) - Offense: There's no weakness among the starters. The line is strong, the running backs
have speed and power, the receivers have potential greatness written all over them and oh yeah, there's a Heisman caliber
quarterback ready to pull it all together. The problem is in the depth as there isn't much of it yet. The hope is that the
starters can stay healthy while the backups will develop in practices. Defense: It's all up to the line. Even after the loss
of Dantonio Burnette and Terrence Holt, the defensive back seven is fast and tremendous led by a deep and talented group of
corners. The line is a different story with no experience at tackle and little returning production from the ends.
4. Virginia (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: It's all about the offensive line. Needing to overcome injuries and youth, the line took a
long while to come together last season. The running game which was so average last year should be far better this season as
a the line is better. The passing game could use a few game-breaking receivers, but Matt Schaub should make the average corps
look great. Defense: This was a very, very young defense that took several lumps last season. Now this is an experienced
group with several rising superstars. The linebackers could eventually be among the best in the country if Ahmad Brooks and
Kai Parham make the instant impact many think they will. The secondary has to tighten up.
5. Georgia Tech (4-4, 5-7) - Offense: The quarterback situation is the key needing consistent play from A.J. Suggs or
Damarius Bilbo for the offense to run effectively. The receiving corps isn't good enough to allow for average quarterback
play. There's a stable of experienced running backs ready to run behind one of the ACC's best offensive lines. Defense: The
defense should be outstanding upfront with problems in the secondary. The pass rush should be tremendous with a slew of big,
fast ends led by the return of Greg Gathers. The linebackers won't get much press, but they're good.
6. Clemson (4-4, 6-6) - Offense: The Tigers have a dizzying array of offensive weapons and even more talent in reserve, but
the team averaged a relatively low 25.4 points per game last year and was rarely clutch against good teams. The one area of
the offense that's void of stars, the offensive line, could turn into one of the offense's most dependable areas. The goal is
to improve the ground game, but that might be hard to do with so many great receivers to throw to. After years of a no
huddle, spread attack, Clemson is going to use more I-formation.. Defense: The back seven is very, very small, but that
shouldn't hinder its production cause of all of the speed. The safeties have to come through to help out the great corners.
The line could end up being the strength of the defense with a few of the linebackers lost due to academic problems. Two
superstars, linebacker John Leake and corner Justin Miller, will pick up the slack for problems elsewhere.
7. Wake Forest (3-5, 5-7) - Offense: It's hard to imagine that a team with only three returning starters will be better than
the year before, but it's possible. Wake Forest has replaced the departed starters with better athletes, and all they need is
a little bit of time. The line should be outstanding and the running game should be as strong as it was last year. Wide
receiver Jason Anderson is a star. Defense: The back eight pretty much returns intact, but the pass defense has to tighten
up. Even though the entire undersized front line needs replacing and is a huge concern, it's active and might not be all that
bad if the top four linemen can stay healthy.
8. North Carolina (1-7, 3-9) - Offense: The offense was Darian Durant and a bunch of other guys. The running game was
pathetic with no punch, and little overall production. Expect things to be much better with several decent prospects. With
the team's top two receivers gone, Durant has to make everyone around him better. Defense: The Tar Heel defense took some
lumps last year undergoing a youth movement. There are several starters returning, so the hope will be for the young players
that had so many problems last year to become stronger. There's no pass rush and little talent among the upper classmen other
than Dexter Reid and Michael Waddell.
9. Duke (1-7, 4-8) - Offense: All eleven starters return, but the offense has to find some explosion. There are plenty of
steady players to keep the chains moving, now they need to find someone to hit the home run. Scoring was a major problem for
the team last year, but there'll be no excuse if the team only puts up 18.9 points per game this season. Defense: The Blue
Devil front seven had the potential to be outstanding coming into the season, but then star lineman Shawn Johnson left the
team. Now the pass rush is a serious concern and the experienced defensive backs have to be a whole lot better than they were
last year. The linebackers should be outstanding.
Preview 2003
Big East Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T1. Miami (6-1 in conference, 11-1 overall) - Offense: This is Miami so the talent is there, but the offense as a whole might
be a year away from being a devastating machine. Brock Berlin and Derrick Crudup are more talented than Ken Dorsey, but they
need more game experience and have to prove they can win like No. 11. Frank Gore is as talented as any running back Miami has
had in recent years and his knee appears to be 100%. The receiving corps and offensive line is very good with backups as
talented as the starters. Defense: The Miami defense should have the best back seven in college football with all the parts
returning from the nation's best pass defense. The line is a little bit of a question mark needing several talented, but
unproven, players to star. It shouldn't be a problem.
T1. Pittsburgh (6-1, 10-2) - Offense: The Pittsburgh offense could explode this year if all the returning skill players can
improve just a little bit. Quarterback Rod Rutherford is an emerging superstar and he has two sensational weapons at his
disposal in Larry Fitzgerald and Kris Wilson. The running game should be strong, but the line has to fill in some big holes.
Defense: Pittsburgh's defense doesn't have much star power outside of end Claude Harriott, but it should be in the top twenty
all year. This group can best be described as solid with strong tackles, linebackers and safeties, but no one that stands
out. The backups are talented and young. This should be a superior defense in 2004 and it won't be too bad this year.
T1. Virginia Tech (6-1, 11-1) - Offense: Don't expect much of a drop-off in overall production from the offense that scored
30.6 points and averaged 371.5 yards per game. The running game will be as good as ever with Kevin Jones running behind an
experienced line. The new wrinkle will be an upgraded passing game with a speedy receiving corps and a more mature Bryan
Randall at quarterback. If Randall isn't the leader of the show, that means the time has arrived for Marcus Vick. Defense:
The defense should be among the best in America if the backups can come through in the back seven. The line should come close
to making 50 sacks and will be a brick wall against the run. The linebackers are very fast and very productive, while CB
DeAngelo Hall leads what should be a strong secondary.
4. Boston College (4-3, 7-5) - Offense: The offense had problems against any defense of substance, but blew up against
everyone else. It'll take a little while for the Eagles to get into a rhythm like it got into with quarterback Brian St.
Pierre. The quarterback situation should be fine. The problem could be the line needing to replace three top starters. If the
line comes around, the skill players should have big seasons. Defense: The Eagles suffered some major losses to injury and
still held teams to 19.5 points per game. There aren't any obvious, All-America-level stars, but there are enough good
playmakers everywhere to assure a good season. If a middle linebacker emerges, the front seven will be outstanding.
5. Syracuse (3-4, 6-6) - Offense: Syracuse was able to move the ball and score, but it struggled too much in key moments. The
rushing attack should be outstanding with two great backs working behind a veteran offensive line. The talent is there at
quarterback and receiver, but the Orangemen need far more production this year out of both areas. Defense: The defense was
beyond horrible last year giving up 33.8 points and 478 yards per game. With those numbers, it might not be a bad thing that
only two starters return to the back seven. The secondary is the biggest weak spot needing to tighten up in all phases. The
line could be tremendous with several veteran stars.
6. West Virginia (2-5, 5-7) - Offense: The West Virginia offense has the skill weapons to run the ball as well as ever, but
the offensive line might not be there to open the same holes as it did last year. Quarterback Rasheed Marshall has to step up
the passing game, but he doesn't have the receivers to do it. Defense: The West Virginia defense wasn't always great, but it
could defend against the run. Now the whole line has to be replaced and doesn't have any obvious stars up front. The back
seven should be strong helped by changes in the secondary. If nothing else, the D will be really, really fast.
7. Temple (1-6, 3-9) - Offense: The offense struggled mightily at times last year, but it wasn't always horrible. The passing
attack could be great if quarterback Mike McGann progresses, or if superstar JUCO transfer Walter Washington becomes a factor
right away. The addition of JUCO star Phil Goodman to an experienced receiving corps should add more zip. The concern is in
the running game needing Makonnen Fenton to shine behind a deep, but average, line. Defense: For all of the problems Temple
had last year, defense wasn't necessarily one of them. The D didn't give up all that many yards, but it couldn't keep teams
out of the end zone continually hurt by bad field position and little help from the offense. Even so, this was a good group
with a solid run defense, and it should be strong again. The secondary has to hope several JUCO transfers can contribute.
8. Rutgers (0-7, 3-9) - Offense: New offensive coordinator Craig Ver Steeg is attempting to put in a new Pro-Style offense,
but it's all about the offensive line. There are several running back options, some speedy receivers, and decent quarterback
prospects, but none of that matters if the line isn't much, much better than it was last year. Rutgers averaged 1.5 yards per
carry and allowed 51 sacks. With an inexperienced and injured line, the production might not improve. Defense: The numbers
weren't great, but it's unfair to pin all of the problems last year on the defense. The offense rarely kept drives going and
never helped give the D any support. Even so, the defense has to be stronger in all areas after giving up 33 points and 405
yards per game. There are a couple of great playmakers, but little overall talent.
Preview 2003
Big Ten Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Michigan (7-1 in conference, 11-1 overall) - Offense: Michigan should be brutally effective with one of the nation's most
talented offensive lines. Having a front wall like thus will allow seasoned veteran John Navarre time to throw, and provide
big holes for star back Chris Perry. There isn't a whole bunch of explosiveness, so don't expect big play after big play.
Look for this to be an offense that grinds out yards, time and moves down the field with little problem. Keep an eye on the
team's conversion percentage on third down. It could be ridiculously high. Defense: With the glaring exception of the Iowa
game, Michigan's defense turned into a brick wall as the regular season went on. Even though there were a few key injuries
and problems against Florida, this was still a good defense. Now it needs to overcome the loss of players like Dan Rumishek,
Shantee Orr, Victor Hobson, Charles Drake and Cato June. Michigan has the talent to reload, but it might take a while to
jell.
2. Ohio State (7-1, 11-1) - Offense: All eleven starters return to an offense that was maddeningly frustrating at times,
powerful at others, and always, always clutch. The running game will be among the best in the country with three great backs
running behind a senior filled offensive line. The passing game might not be high-octane, but it's effective. Defense: The
defense bent, but hardly ever broke last season. It might be dangerous to play with fire again with several new replacements
in the back seven. Fortunately, the defensive line is awesome with, potentially, the best pair of ends in the country.
Leaders need to be found to replace Matt Wilhelm and Mike Doss.
3. Wisconsin (6-2, 10-2) - Offense: With a statue at quarterback now, the offense will have to be a bit more conventional.
The Badgers will still run the ball with star Anthony Davis to give the ball too, but the main job will be to protect senior
quarterback Jim Sorgi so he can get the ball to his fantastic receiving corps. Defense: There's no reason for the defense not
to be one of the best in the Big Ten. The front seven should be outstanding, and if the secondary can tighten up, look out.
It'll be a major disappointment if the Badgers aren't near the top of the Big Ten in sacks.
T4. Minnesota (5-3, 9-3) - Offense: If the Gophers can avoid injuries, this will be one of America's most devastating
offenses with three outstanding running backs, a big, fast receiving corps and a veteran quarterback to lead the way. The
offensive line has to be a bit more physical and has to keep progressing. Defense: The defense returns most of the top
playmakers so the hope is for the experience to turn into production. The run defense was horrible last season while the
secondary was nothing to write home about when the ball was in the air. The front seven appears to be far bigger and
stronger, so don't expect as many problems against the run.
T4. Purdue (5-3, 9-3) - Offense: Purdue has some of the most dangerous skill players in college football with two talented
quarterbacks, three solid running backs and a sensational trio of receivers. All that talent will go to waste if the line
can't replace several starters and find a few backups. Defense: There's not a whole bunch of depth, but the starters should
be excellent. The line can get to the quarterback with consistency, while the linebacking corps, along with safety Stuart
Schweigert, are excellent against the run. Once again though, there can't be a slew of injuries or there will be some major
problems.
6. Iowa (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: Iowa has to replace a Heisman Trophy runner-up at quarterback, a John Mackey Award winning
tight end and four starters from the offensive line. It's not time to panic yet with a great set of receivers and good
running backs returning, but this group won't be the juggernaut that last year's Iowa offense was. Everything started up
front last year and unfortunately, this line isn't anywhere near as good. Defense: Even with some major losses, the defense
should be outstanding. The line could be the best in the Big Ten if there aren't any injuries to the starters, while the
linebackers could be strong with time. The concern is over the secondary where two young corners have to give Iowa more
production than it got last year.
T7. Illinois (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: Illinois has to overcome the loss of some major skill players including the whole
receiving corps. Even so, things aren't that bad. There's talent at receiver with help on the way. The running backs should
be strong going with a committee of backs. The quarterback situation is the best in the Big Ten. Defense: The Illini has
speed and athleticism, but it isn't all that physical. The front seven should be great at getting into the backfield and
should once again be solid against the run. The secondary is a concern without much talent on the corners.
T7. Penn State (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: It'll be impossible to replace Heisman-caliber running back Larry Johnson, first-round
draft pick receiver Bryant Johnson and almost the entire offensive line. Things aren't hopeless as the line will end up being
fine with some time and the receiving corps has weapons. The running game is another story with little to no pop among the
tailbacks. The stars are under center as Zack Mills and Michael Robinson form one of the better quarterbacking tandems in the
Big Ten. Defense: There's experience and production returning, but almost all the star power of last year is gone. With
several great young athletes, the defense should eventually be decent with a little work to figure out the right
combinations. Until then, the linebacking corps will have to carry the load with several excellent prospects.
T9. Michigan State (1-7, 4-8) - Offense: There aren't any established stars, so the Spartans will rely on several players to
fill the roles at all the key spots. The quarterback situation will remain a mystery until the fall when Jeff Smoker gets an
honest shot at taking back the job. The running backs and receivers lack any appreciable experience, but they can all fly.
Defense: The MSU defense got worse as last year went on getting shoved around against good running teams. (Did Larry Johnson
get touched?) This is a defense completely devoid of stars, but that doesn't mean it can't play. The linebacking corps has
decent returning production, while the secondary has some excellent young prospects. Now the line has to come through against
the run. Generating some semblance of a pass rush wouldn't be a bad thing.
T9. Northwestern (1-7, 2-10) - Offense: If the offense can avoid injuries, it should be potent. The running backs are
tremendous with the underpublicized Jason Wright and Noah Herron forming a solid 1-2 punch. The passing game will be fine if
a deep threat emerges. The line has to replace two stars, but should be fine with a little bit of time. Defense: The
potential is there for this defense to be a whole bunch better. After giving up 41 points and close to 500 yards per game, it
can't be any worse. The return of Pat Durr and Ryan Peterson from injury should do wonders for the run defense. Production
from the corners has to improve and a pass rush of any kind would be nice.
11. Indiana (0-8, 2-10) - Offense: The offense will only work if the offensive line shines. The skill players should be
excellent with the 1-2 receiving punch of Glenn Johnson and Courtney Roby working well with new quarterback Matt LoVecchio.
There are three good running backs to rely on. The problem will be on the line with no depth and little overall experience.
Defense: It's hard to see how this defense is going to come close to stopping anyone in the Big Ten. There are seven players
with starting experience, but this is still a very, very young defense. The front seven is undersized and there's no depth
whatsoever. The secondary should be greatly improved.
Preview 2003
Big XII Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTH
1. Kansas State (7-1 in Big XII, 12-1 overall) - Offense: With a sensational backfield and the maturation of quarterback Ell
Roberson, the Wildcats will be as explosive as always if the offensive line comes around. With only two starters returning up
front, every practice is critical to get this group together. Even with the question marks, the line should be fantastic
after a little bit of time. If the Wildcats want to throw, they have solid receivers to get the ball to. Defense: The
Wildcats were amazing last year with a great run defense and shut down corners against the pass. There aren't any superstars
like Terence Newman and Terry Pierce, but the cupboard isn't bare with several good backups ready to shine and decent
returning starters. The key will be the play of the defensive line needing to replace three starters.
2. Colorado (5-3, 6-6) - Offense: Colorado has been able to win with a sensational running game working behind a tremendous
line. The running backs are there, but the line isn't with nine underclassmen among the top twelve linemen. The receiving
corps has speed, depth and talent, but a quarterback has to emerge to be able to deliver the ball. Defense: The Buffs could
have some huge problems if injuries hit with little to no experienced depth in key spots. There are eight returning starters,
but few stars. Using a 4-2-5 defense is a plus with a rail thin linebacking corps. The defensive backs can hit, but there's
some concern over how well the veteran corners can lock down. Look out for the ends to get in the backfield early and often.
3. Missouri (5-3, 9-3) - Offense: Missouri's offense should be unstoppable as long as Brad Smith is playing. The running
backs are strong, the offensive line is experienced and talented, and the receiving corps has potential. It all comes down to
Smith who has the weight of the entire program on his shoulders. Defense: The Tigers didn't progress well having problems
late in the year stopping anyone. This year's crew is young, but there's depth everywhere with some outstanding newcomers to
the secondary and good options just about everywhere else.
4. Nebraska (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: Nebraska is still going to run the ball out of the I, but there are going to be a few minor
changes. New offensive coordinator Barney Cotton is going bring the Nebraska passing game into the 21st century in baby steps
by starting out incorporating more short passes. There are a couple of problems with this. 1) Jammal Lord can't throw these
passes with any consistency, 2) Nebraska doesn't have any receivers to threaten anyone and 3) the line is learning how to
pass block. All is not lost though as there's more speed at receiver than the program has had in years and there are several
intriguing running backs to roll behind a great line. Defense: The defense struggled through some major growing pains last
season and has to be far better this year. New defensive coordinator Bo Pelini is going to try and changed things up with his
hard-nosed attitude and aggressive style. There aren't many standout players like a Chris Kelsay or a DeJuan Groce, but there
are several good, rising playmakers.
5. Iowa State (1-7, 4-8) - Offense: As good as Seneca Wallace and the rest of the Iowa State offense was at times in 2002, it
wasn't all that explosive. Wallace made some highlight plays, but when he bogged down, the offense died. The Cyclones only
averaged 3.7 yards per carry while the passing game was hardly high-octane. Don't be shocked if the offense is better this
year with more players asked to carry the load. The receivers and running backs will be strong, but the offensive line and
quarterback situation is still a bit of a concern. Defense: The players are there for a good 2003 season. The line could be
something spectacular with a little more improvement with everything revolving around two great tackles. The back seven is
experienced, but not anything special compared to the top Big XII teams. Linebacker Brandon Brown could be a superstar.
6. Kansas (1-7, 3-9) - Offense: The offense showed signs of life last season moving the ball well at times. Quarterback Bill
Whittemore and running back Clark Green are two of the better, unknown talents in the Big XII. The line needs work with only
one returning starter and that one, junior guard Tony Coker, has a bad back. This will still be a work in progress, but it
could be fine as long as Whittemore and Green are healthy. Defense: As bad as the Kansas defense was last season, there's
hope for the future. It might not happen right away this year, but it should get better soon. It's asking a lot to improve by
leaps and bounds after giving up 42.2 points per game, but the KU D should be stronger as the young players of last year get
a little more experienced. Don't expect miracles, but they should be able to shave ten points off the average.
SOUTH
1. Texas (8-0 in Big XII, 12-0 overall) - Offense: Texas might have the best offense in America, but the skill players won't
be able to reach their potential if the young and inexperienced line doesn't come together. The quarterback situation will be
fine with Chance Mock and Vincent Young each able to lead the team without a problem. The running backs and receivers should
be killers. Defense: The defense loses three huge producers, but should be fine. The secondary will be one of the best in the
country with three returning starters, while the linebackers should be solid led by Derrick Johnson. The concern might be the
size on the ends other than Kaylen Thornton, but that shouldn't be too much of a problem with the huge players at tackle.
2. Oklahoma (7-1, 11-1) - Offense: The Sooners are going to find ways to score, but there aren't a lot of obvious stars. The
OU offense is set up by its fantastic defense with a premium placed on not turning the ball over and to take advantage of
great field position. There isn't a Quentin Griffin on the team, but the running game should be fine in Renaldo Works really
is as good as he looked at times this spring. The passing game might not be all that potent unless some of the talented
receivers finally realize their potential. The line should be excellent. Defense: This is the best defense in America. Nine
starters return to what was one of the best defenses in 2002, and it only gets stronger with the emergence of some great
prospects. With a little more of a pass rush from the ends and a little bit of tightening up in the pass defense, this could
be the best defense that college football has seen in several years.
3. Texas A&M (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: A&M's offense was dying before Dustin Long and Reggie McNeal took over. When Long blew up
for seven touchdown passes against Texas Tech, it might have sparked a new era of A&M football with an offense that actually
moves the ball. The running backs and receivers need to provide a little more of a spark. The offensive line will be strong
on the outside needing the guards to step up in the middle. Defense: Several top players need to be replaced and the depth
needs to be developed almost everywhere. Even so, Texas A&M, as always, has good defensive players and should be able to
adjust from the 3-4 to the 4-3 without too much of a problem. Defensive coordinator Carl Torbush is a good one and should
have this group humming.
4. Oklahoma State (3-5, 7-5) - Offense: If the tackles can come through and be dependable, there might not be any way to stop
this offense. Quarterback Jose Fields will once again put up some huge numbers throwing to the Woods brothers, while an
extremely talented stable of backs tear up defenses on the ground. Defense: The defense wasn't all that strong last year, and
that was with a ton of returning experience. It's never a good thing when you're counting on several true freshmen to play
big roles. The run defense should be fine, but the pass defense could have problems breaking in new corners and with few pass
rushing threats to put the pressure on.
5. Texas Tech (3-5, 5-7) - Offense: Tech won't be quite as potent without star quarterback Kliff Kingsbury, but everyone else
returns to what should be an explosive offense. With all four starting receivers returning and two great running backs
working behind a decent line, it'll all be up to quarterback B.J. Symons to run the show. He should do just fine. Defense:
Even with all the experienced talent and playmakers, the Texas Tech defense was worse last year than it was in 2001. Expect
an even bigger drop-off this year with a terrifyingly inexperienced front seven. The secondary has a great pair of safeties,
but the group isn't going to have problems against top passing teams.
6. Baylor (0-8, 2-10) - Offense: The hope is for more overall explosion with Guy Morriss and offensive coordinator Brent
Pease installing a more open passing attack. The Bears have enough decent receivers to make this interesting, but it'll take
a little while For a team that scored 11 points or less in seven games, they have to do whatever's possible to put points up
on the board. With an experienced group of skill players returning, that should be possible. Defense: Baylor's defense
couldn't stop anyone last season allowing 41.3 points and 405.2 yards per game. This year, seven starters return to a group
that should be more athletic, but not all that experienced with no developed depth and some injury concerns at a few key
spots. The tackles are starting from scratch, but they need to shine to take the pressure off the small and average
linebacking corps. Morriss compares his defense to Mississippi State's aggressive style.
Preview 2003
Conference USA Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Southern Miss (8-0 in conference, 11-1 overall) - Offense: Southern Miss is changing up the offense to try and be more
explosive and get more big plays. Even with a Derrick Nix's 1,194-yard season, the running game was still a bit stale. The
average passing attack didn't help matters. The offensive line will be a work in progress all season long, but the skill
players should all be better than solid. Defense: The Southern Miss defense gave up 18.3 points and 336 yards per game. With
all of the stars returning, there's no reason to think the Eagles won't be just as good, if not better, this year. Forget
doing much anything against the huge hitting back seven. To nitpick, everyone needs to get a little stronger and a little
bigger, but every team wants to do that.
2. TCU (7-1, 10-2) - Offense: The running game will be magnificent with two outstanding backs running behind a solid line.
The passing game is a different story with several new faces at receiver and no real depth behind still-recovering Tye Gunn
at quarterback. Defense: The Horned Frogs lost several starters including star linebacker LaMarcus McDonald and top defensive
back Jason Goss, but there might not be much of a drop-off from the defense that dominated last year. This is a fast crew
with several all-star candidates. If they can to work together like last year's defense, there won't be much of a problem. If
nothing else, the TCU D will be one of the best in the nation at getting into the backfield.
T3. Cincinnati (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: UC should still be explosive even after losing most of its ammo. The Bearcats lose the
top four pass catchers, an all-star back DeMarco McCleskey and several top players on the line. It'll be a numbers game with
five running backs and six receivers looking to pick up the slack. The line isn't deep, but it should be strong inside with
two good guards and a rock at center. Defense: The defense isn't all that big, but it's fast, productive and should be very
good again. Even without a signature star like Antwan Peek, the Bearcats should be solid everywhere with good starters and
decent depth. The tackles are the only big concern.
T3. Louisville (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: The offensive line was a disaster last season, but it should be far better this year
with more experience and more depth. That's good news for a running game featuring superstar-to-be Eric Shelton. Stefan
LeFors and Justin Rascati are locked in a battle to replace star quarterback Dave Ragone, but they might simply be buying
time until superstar recruit Michael Bush joins the team. Defense: The defense never quite got the credit it deserved last
year, but it got strong as the season went on. Several top players are gone including Dewayne White, Anthony Floyd and Curry
Burns, so it'll be up to a few young guns to instantly star. The corners and linebacking corps will be great.
T3. Tulane (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: The Green Wave should explode. Ten starters return, and that doesn't count star receiver
Roydell Williams coming back from an early season injury. It'll all be up to the line. After giving up 42 sacks, it needs to
keep quarterback J.P. Losman clean so he has time to connect with his loaded receiving corps. Running back Mewelde Moore is
one of the best backs in college football. Defense: The defensive production improved last year by leaps and bounds allowing
120 fewer yards per game. With only three returning starters, the potential is there for a return to the dark times of the
Green Wave defense. There's great athleticism everywhere, but no depth on the line or secondary. The linebacking corps is
going to have to carry things for a while.
6. Memphis (4-4, 6-6) - Offense: The Tigers have the backfield to shine with a great quarterback and a wonderful stable of
backs, but the young receivers need to shine right away. The line will take a while to come together needing to replace four
starters. Defense: Memphis had a few problems making plays last year getting torched by most offenses with a pulse. The front
seven has to be more physical upfront, but they're experienced and could grow into something strong as the year goes on. The
blazing fast secondary will be fine if it can avoid injuries.
7. East Carolina (4-4, 4-8) - Offense: The potential is there for this to be a strong offense, but the passing game has to
come around. The line will be one of the best in the league and a devastating run blocking group to open holes for a great
group of backs. The receiving corps could be a big problem if no one steps up into the number one spot. That's not good news
for a quarterback, Paul Troth, that needs weapons to work with. Defense: Expect the production to be significantly better
under head coach John Thompson and defensive coordinator Jerry Odom. The defense will switch from a 3-4 to a more traditional
4-3 with several other new wrinkles added. The linebackers are light, but good. The secondary and line return a little bit of
game experience, but few big-time players.
8. UAB (3-5, 5-7) - Offense: The offense is full of athletes and full of young talent. Now it has to grow up. Quarterback
Darrell Hackney and receiver Roddy White could be the most dangerous pitch-and-catch combination in the league. The backs and
line are big and experienced, but each has to be more productive. Defense: New defensive coordinator Wayne Bolt has scrapped
the 4-2-5 defense for a more traditional 4-3. The players are there to make a dramatic turnaround in overall production with
a strong back seven and no concerns among the new starters. A pass rush needs to develop to help out the corners.
9. South Florida (2-6, 4-7) - Offense: USF might not have a Marquel Blackwell to carry the offense on his shoulders, but the
overall production might not slip with several good looking offensive players ready to shine. If quarterback Ronnie Banks
plays well, all should be fine with a deep corps of running backs, good young receivers, and a rising group of stars on the
line. Defense: The entire front four is gone along with star linebacker Kawika Mitchell and both corners. The defense won't
completely collapse with athletic prospects at each position, but the team will be backing on instant production from these
newcomers in key spots. The starting safety tandem is one of the best in America.
10. Houston (1-7, 3-9) - Offense: It'll be hard to be as explosive as it was last season with the loss of the top two
receivers and running back Joffrey Reynolds. Even so, there's enough talent here to move the ball with the best deep threats
returning in the passing game and several decent options at quarterback. If Barrick Nealy can return after tearing his ACL,
the offense should turn out to be fine. Defense: The defense gave up way too many points and was miserable against the pass.
The alignment has gone from a 4-2-5 to a 4-3 taking the pressure off the safeties so they don't have to make so many plays
against the run. The front seven should be a wall against average running teams, so the key will be for the corners to be
able to lock down.
11. Army (0-8, 0-12) - Offense: The running backs and receivers are relatively talented, but the Black Knights have to settle
the quarterback situation and has to pray that an inexperienced line can jell in a hurry. The offense only scored 18.8 points
per game last season and should be a bit more potent this year. Defense: The defense has better athletes than it's had in
years and now has to stop someone. Completely helpless last season, the Cadets gave up 40.9 points and 393 yards per game
last year failing to stop anyone. To be fair, much of the problem was due to an offense that never kept the chains moving,
but this year's defense has to be far stronger.
ACC Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T1. Florida State (6-2 in conference, 7-5 overall) - Offense: Being Florida State, there are athletes and players with raw
talent that most programs can only dream about. The question is whether or not this crew can use all this talent to form a
devastating offense. The quarterback situation is fine, but Chris Rix could be running for his life behind an inexperienced
line with no depth. The running backs could be outstanding if Greg Jones is healthy again. Defense: Eleven starters (ten if
you don't count Darnell Dockett) return and 26 lettermen will be in the mix for an experienced defense that got better and
better as last season went on. There aren't any monsters on the defensive line other than Dockett, but the linebacking corps
is more than good enough to pick up the slack. The secondary is experienced, but it has to be far better than it was last
year. With at least eight good players to choose from, Mickey Andrews will find the right mix.
T1. Maryland (6-2, 10-2) - Offense: The offense could be even better than its been over the last two years, but it can't
afford any injuries. There's little depth at quarterback and on the line, but the starters are extremely talented. The
receiving corps is big and explosive, but the offense will revolve around the running game led by Bruce Perry and Josh Allen.
Defense: The back eight should be among the best in America. The secondary returns intact to go along the experienced
linebacking corps. The line is bit of a problem with little developed depth and needing C.J. Feldheim to return from a knee
injury.
T1. North Carolina State (6-2, 9-3) - Offense: There's no weakness among the starters. The line is strong, the running backs
have speed and power, the receivers have potential greatness written all over them and oh yeah, there's a Heisman caliber
quarterback ready to pull it all together. The problem is in the depth as there isn't much of it yet. The hope is that the
starters can stay healthy while the backups will develop in practices. Defense: It's all up to the line. Even after the loss
of Dantonio Burnette and Terrence Holt, the defensive back seven is fast and tremendous led by a deep and talented group of
corners. The line is a different story with no experience at tackle and little returning production from the ends.
4. Virginia (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: It's all about the offensive line. Needing to overcome injuries and youth, the line took a
long while to come together last season. The running game which was so average last year should be far better this season as
a the line is better. The passing game could use a few game-breaking receivers, but Matt Schaub should make the average corps
look great. Defense: This was a very, very young defense that took several lumps last season. Now this is an experienced
group with several rising superstars. The linebackers could eventually be among the best in the country if Ahmad Brooks and
Kai Parham make the instant impact many think they will. The secondary has to tighten up.
5. Georgia Tech (4-4, 5-7) - Offense: The quarterback situation is the key needing consistent play from A.J. Suggs or
Damarius Bilbo for the offense to run effectively. The receiving corps isn't good enough to allow for average quarterback
play. There's a stable of experienced running backs ready to run behind one of the ACC's best offensive lines. Defense: The
defense should be outstanding upfront with problems in the secondary. The pass rush should be tremendous with a slew of big,
fast ends led by the return of Greg Gathers. The linebackers won't get much press, but they're good.
6. Clemson (4-4, 6-6) - Offense: The Tigers have a dizzying array of offensive weapons and even more talent in reserve, but
the team averaged a relatively low 25.4 points per game last year and was rarely clutch against good teams. The one area of
the offense that's void of stars, the offensive line, could turn into one of the offense's most dependable areas. The goal is
to improve the ground game, but that might be hard to do with so many great receivers to throw to. After years of a no
huddle, spread attack, Clemson is going to use more I-formation.. Defense: The back seven is very, very small, but that
shouldn't hinder its production cause of all of the speed. The safeties have to come through to help out the great corners.
The line could end up being the strength of the defense with a few of the linebackers lost due to academic problems. Two
superstars, linebacker John Leake and corner Justin Miller, will pick up the slack for problems elsewhere.
7. Wake Forest (3-5, 5-7) - Offense: It's hard to imagine that a team with only three returning starters will be better than
the year before, but it's possible. Wake Forest has replaced the departed starters with better athletes, and all they need is
a little bit of time. The line should be outstanding and the running game should be as strong as it was last year. Wide
receiver Jason Anderson is a star. Defense: The back eight pretty much returns intact, but the pass defense has to tighten
up. Even though the entire undersized front line needs replacing and is a huge concern, it's active and might not be all that
bad if the top four linemen can stay healthy.
8. North Carolina (1-7, 3-9) - Offense: The offense was Darian Durant and a bunch of other guys. The running game was
pathetic with no punch, and little overall production. Expect things to be much better with several decent prospects. With
the team's top two receivers gone, Durant has to make everyone around him better. Defense: The Tar Heel defense took some
lumps last year undergoing a youth movement. There are several starters returning, so the hope will be for the young players
that had so many problems last year to become stronger. There's no pass rush and little talent among the upper classmen other
than Dexter Reid and Michael Waddell.
9. Duke (1-7, 4-8) - Offense: All eleven starters return, but the offense has to find some explosion. There are plenty of
steady players to keep the chains moving, now they need to find someone to hit the home run. Scoring was a major problem for
the team last year, but there'll be no excuse if the team only puts up 18.9 points per game this season. Defense: The Blue
Devil front seven had the potential to be outstanding coming into the season, but then star lineman Shawn Johnson left the
team. Now the pass rush is a serious concern and the experienced defensive backs have to be a whole lot better than they were
last year. The linebackers should be outstanding.
Preview 2003
Big East Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T1. Miami (6-1 in conference, 11-1 overall) - Offense: This is Miami so the talent is there, but the offense as a whole might
be a year away from being a devastating machine. Brock Berlin and Derrick Crudup are more talented than Ken Dorsey, but they
need more game experience and have to prove they can win like No. 11. Frank Gore is as talented as any running back Miami has
had in recent years and his knee appears to be 100%. The receiving corps and offensive line is very good with backups as
talented as the starters. Defense: The Miami defense should have the best back seven in college football with all the parts
returning from the nation's best pass defense. The line is a little bit of a question mark needing several talented, but
unproven, players to star. It shouldn't be a problem.
T1. Pittsburgh (6-1, 10-2) - Offense: The Pittsburgh offense could explode this year if all the returning skill players can
improve just a little bit. Quarterback Rod Rutherford is an emerging superstar and he has two sensational weapons at his
disposal in Larry Fitzgerald and Kris Wilson. The running game should be strong, but the line has to fill in some big holes.
Defense: Pittsburgh's defense doesn't have much star power outside of end Claude Harriott, but it should be in the top twenty
all year. This group can best be described as solid with strong tackles, linebackers and safeties, but no one that stands
out. The backups are talented and young. This should be a superior defense in 2004 and it won't be too bad this year.
T1. Virginia Tech (6-1, 11-1) - Offense: Don't expect much of a drop-off in overall production from the offense that scored
30.6 points and averaged 371.5 yards per game. The running game will be as good as ever with Kevin Jones running behind an
experienced line. The new wrinkle will be an upgraded passing game with a speedy receiving corps and a more mature Bryan
Randall at quarterback. If Randall isn't the leader of the show, that means the time has arrived for Marcus Vick. Defense:
The defense should be among the best in America if the backups can come through in the back seven. The line should come close
to making 50 sacks and will be a brick wall against the run. The linebackers are very fast and very productive, while CB
DeAngelo Hall leads what should be a strong secondary.
4. Boston College (4-3, 7-5) - Offense: The offense had problems against any defense of substance, but blew up against
everyone else. It'll take a little while for the Eagles to get into a rhythm like it got into with quarterback Brian St.
Pierre. The quarterback situation should be fine. The problem could be the line needing to replace three top starters. If the
line comes around, the skill players should have big seasons. Defense: The Eagles suffered some major losses to injury and
still held teams to 19.5 points per game. There aren't any obvious, All-America-level stars, but there are enough good
playmakers everywhere to assure a good season. If a middle linebacker emerges, the front seven will be outstanding.
5. Syracuse (3-4, 6-6) - Offense: Syracuse was able to move the ball and score, but it struggled too much in key moments. The
rushing attack should be outstanding with two great backs working behind a veteran offensive line. The talent is there at
quarterback and receiver, but the Orangemen need far more production this year out of both areas. Defense: The defense was
beyond horrible last year giving up 33.8 points and 478 yards per game. With those numbers, it might not be a bad thing that
only two starters return to the back seven. The secondary is the biggest weak spot needing to tighten up in all phases. The
line could be tremendous with several veteran stars.
6. West Virginia (2-5, 5-7) - Offense: The West Virginia offense has the skill weapons to run the ball as well as ever, but
the offensive line might not be there to open the same holes as it did last year. Quarterback Rasheed Marshall has to step up
the passing game, but he doesn't have the receivers to do it. Defense: The West Virginia defense wasn't always great, but it
could defend against the run. Now the whole line has to be replaced and doesn't have any obvious stars up front. The back
seven should be strong helped by changes in the secondary. If nothing else, the D will be really, really fast.
7. Temple (1-6, 3-9) - Offense: The offense struggled mightily at times last year, but it wasn't always horrible. The passing
attack could be great if quarterback Mike McGann progresses, or if superstar JUCO transfer Walter Washington becomes a factor
right away. The addition of JUCO star Phil Goodman to an experienced receiving corps should add more zip. The concern is in
the running game needing Makonnen Fenton to shine behind a deep, but average, line. Defense: For all of the problems Temple
had last year, defense wasn't necessarily one of them. The D didn't give up all that many yards, but it couldn't keep teams
out of the end zone continually hurt by bad field position and little help from the offense. Even so, this was a good group
with a solid run defense, and it should be strong again. The secondary has to hope several JUCO transfers can contribute.
8. Rutgers (0-7, 3-9) - Offense: New offensive coordinator Craig Ver Steeg is attempting to put in a new Pro-Style offense,
but it's all about the offensive line. There are several running back options, some speedy receivers, and decent quarterback
prospects, but none of that matters if the line isn't much, much better than it was last year. Rutgers averaged 1.5 yards per
carry and allowed 51 sacks. With an inexperienced and injured line, the production might not improve. Defense: The numbers
weren't great, but it's unfair to pin all of the problems last year on the defense. The offense rarely kept drives going and
never helped give the D any support. Even so, the defense has to be stronger in all areas after giving up 33 points and 405
yards per game. There are a couple of great playmakers, but little overall talent.
Preview 2003
Big Ten Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Michigan (7-1 in conference, 11-1 overall) - Offense: Michigan should be brutally effective with one of the nation's most
talented offensive lines. Having a front wall like thus will allow seasoned veteran John Navarre time to throw, and provide
big holes for star back Chris Perry. There isn't a whole bunch of explosiveness, so don't expect big play after big play.
Look for this to be an offense that grinds out yards, time and moves down the field with little problem. Keep an eye on the
team's conversion percentage on third down. It could be ridiculously high. Defense: With the glaring exception of the Iowa
game, Michigan's defense turned into a brick wall as the regular season went on. Even though there were a few key injuries
and problems against Florida, this was still a good defense. Now it needs to overcome the loss of players like Dan Rumishek,
Shantee Orr, Victor Hobson, Charles Drake and Cato June. Michigan has the talent to reload, but it might take a while to
jell.
2. Ohio State (7-1, 11-1) - Offense: All eleven starters return to an offense that was maddeningly frustrating at times,
powerful at others, and always, always clutch. The running game will be among the best in the country with three great backs
running behind a senior filled offensive line. The passing game might not be high-octane, but it's effective. Defense: The
defense bent, but hardly ever broke last season. It might be dangerous to play with fire again with several new replacements
in the back seven. Fortunately, the defensive line is awesome with, potentially, the best pair of ends in the country.
Leaders need to be found to replace Matt Wilhelm and Mike Doss.
3. Wisconsin (6-2, 10-2) - Offense: With a statue at quarterback now, the offense will have to be a bit more conventional.
The Badgers will still run the ball with star Anthony Davis to give the ball too, but the main job will be to protect senior
quarterback Jim Sorgi so he can get the ball to his fantastic receiving corps. Defense: There's no reason for the defense not
to be one of the best in the Big Ten. The front seven should be outstanding, and if the secondary can tighten up, look out.
It'll be a major disappointment if the Badgers aren't near the top of the Big Ten in sacks.
T4. Minnesota (5-3, 9-3) - Offense: If the Gophers can avoid injuries, this will be one of America's most devastating
offenses with three outstanding running backs, a big, fast receiving corps and a veteran quarterback to lead the way. The
offensive line has to be a bit more physical and has to keep progressing. Defense: The defense returns most of the top
playmakers so the hope is for the experience to turn into production. The run defense was horrible last season while the
secondary was nothing to write home about when the ball was in the air. The front seven appears to be far bigger and
stronger, so don't expect as many problems against the run.
T4. Purdue (5-3, 9-3) - Offense: Purdue has some of the most dangerous skill players in college football with two talented
quarterbacks, three solid running backs and a sensational trio of receivers. All that talent will go to waste if the line
can't replace several starters and find a few backups. Defense: There's not a whole bunch of depth, but the starters should
be excellent. The line can get to the quarterback with consistency, while the linebacking corps, along with safety Stuart
Schweigert, are excellent against the run. Once again though, there can't be a slew of injuries or there will be some major
problems.
6. Iowa (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: Iowa has to replace a Heisman Trophy runner-up at quarterback, a John Mackey Award winning
tight end and four starters from the offensive line. It's not time to panic yet with a great set of receivers and good
running backs returning, but this group won't be the juggernaut that last year's Iowa offense was. Everything started up
front last year and unfortunately, this line isn't anywhere near as good. Defense: Even with some major losses, the defense
should be outstanding. The line could be the best in the Big Ten if there aren't any injuries to the starters, while the
linebackers could be strong with time. The concern is over the secondary where two young corners have to give Iowa more
production than it got last year.
T7. Illinois (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: Illinois has to overcome the loss of some major skill players including the whole
receiving corps. Even so, things aren't that bad. There's talent at receiver with help on the way. The running backs should
be strong going with a committee of backs. The quarterback situation is the best in the Big Ten. Defense: The Illini has
speed and athleticism, but it isn't all that physical. The front seven should be great at getting into the backfield and
should once again be solid against the run. The secondary is a concern without much talent on the corners.
T7. Penn State (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: It'll be impossible to replace Heisman-caliber running back Larry Johnson, first-round
draft pick receiver Bryant Johnson and almost the entire offensive line. Things aren't hopeless as the line will end up being
fine with some time and the receiving corps has weapons. The running game is another story with little to no pop among the
tailbacks. The stars are under center as Zack Mills and Michael Robinson form one of the better quarterbacking tandems in the
Big Ten. Defense: There's experience and production returning, but almost all the star power of last year is gone. With
several great young athletes, the defense should eventually be decent with a little work to figure out the right
combinations. Until then, the linebacking corps will have to carry the load with several excellent prospects.
T9. Michigan State (1-7, 4-8) - Offense: There aren't any established stars, so the Spartans will rely on several players to
fill the roles at all the key spots. The quarterback situation will remain a mystery until the fall when Jeff Smoker gets an
honest shot at taking back the job. The running backs and receivers lack any appreciable experience, but they can all fly.
Defense: The MSU defense got worse as last year went on getting shoved around against good running teams. (Did Larry Johnson
get touched?) This is a defense completely devoid of stars, but that doesn't mean it can't play. The linebacking corps has
decent returning production, while the secondary has some excellent young prospects. Now the line has to come through against
the run. Generating some semblance of a pass rush wouldn't be a bad thing.
T9. Northwestern (1-7, 2-10) - Offense: If the offense can avoid injuries, it should be potent. The running backs are
tremendous with the underpublicized Jason Wright and Noah Herron forming a solid 1-2 punch. The passing game will be fine if
a deep threat emerges. The line has to replace two stars, but should be fine with a little bit of time. Defense: The
potential is there for this defense to be a whole bunch better. After giving up 41 points and close to 500 yards per game, it
can't be any worse. The return of Pat Durr and Ryan Peterson from injury should do wonders for the run defense. Production
from the corners has to improve and a pass rush of any kind would be nice.
11. Indiana (0-8, 2-10) - Offense: The offense will only work if the offensive line shines. The skill players should be
excellent with the 1-2 receiving punch of Glenn Johnson and Courtney Roby working well with new quarterback Matt LoVecchio.
There are three good running backs to rely on. The problem will be on the line with no depth and little overall experience.
Defense: It's hard to see how this defense is going to come close to stopping anyone in the Big Ten. There are seven players
with starting experience, but this is still a very, very young defense. The front seven is undersized and there's no depth
whatsoever. The secondary should be greatly improved.
Preview 2003
Big XII Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTH
1. Kansas State (7-1 in Big XII, 12-1 overall) - Offense: With a sensational backfield and the maturation of quarterback Ell
Roberson, the Wildcats will be as explosive as always if the offensive line comes around. With only two starters returning up
front, every practice is critical to get this group together. Even with the question marks, the line should be fantastic
after a little bit of time. If the Wildcats want to throw, they have solid receivers to get the ball to. Defense: The
Wildcats were amazing last year with a great run defense and shut down corners against the pass. There aren't any superstars
like Terence Newman and Terry Pierce, but the cupboard isn't bare with several good backups ready to shine and decent
returning starters. The key will be the play of the defensive line needing to replace three starters.
2. Colorado (5-3, 6-6) - Offense: Colorado has been able to win with a sensational running game working behind a tremendous
line. The running backs are there, but the line isn't with nine underclassmen among the top twelve linemen. The receiving
corps has speed, depth and talent, but a quarterback has to emerge to be able to deliver the ball. Defense: The Buffs could
have some huge problems if injuries hit with little to no experienced depth in key spots. There are eight returning starters,
but few stars. Using a 4-2-5 defense is a plus with a rail thin linebacking corps. The defensive backs can hit, but there's
some concern over how well the veteran corners can lock down. Look out for the ends to get in the backfield early and often.
3. Missouri (5-3, 9-3) - Offense: Missouri's offense should be unstoppable as long as Brad Smith is playing. The running
backs are strong, the offensive line is experienced and talented, and the receiving corps has potential. It all comes down to
Smith who has the weight of the entire program on his shoulders. Defense: The Tigers didn't progress well having problems
late in the year stopping anyone. This year's crew is young, but there's depth everywhere with some outstanding newcomers to
the secondary and good options just about everywhere else.
4. Nebraska (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: Nebraska is still going to run the ball out of the I, but there are going to be a few minor
changes. New offensive coordinator Barney Cotton is going bring the Nebraska passing game into the 21st century in baby steps
by starting out incorporating more short passes. There are a couple of problems with this. 1) Jammal Lord can't throw these
passes with any consistency, 2) Nebraska doesn't have any receivers to threaten anyone and 3) the line is learning how to
pass block. All is not lost though as there's more speed at receiver than the program has had in years and there are several
intriguing running backs to roll behind a great line. Defense: The defense struggled through some major growing pains last
season and has to be far better this year. New defensive coordinator Bo Pelini is going to try and changed things up with his
hard-nosed attitude and aggressive style. There aren't many standout players like a Chris Kelsay or a DeJuan Groce, but there
are several good, rising playmakers.
5. Iowa State (1-7, 4-8) - Offense: As good as Seneca Wallace and the rest of the Iowa State offense was at times in 2002, it
wasn't all that explosive. Wallace made some highlight plays, but when he bogged down, the offense died. The Cyclones only
averaged 3.7 yards per carry while the passing game was hardly high-octane. Don't be shocked if the offense is better this
year with more players asked to carry the load. The receivers and running backs will be strong, but the offensive line and
quarterback situation is still a bit of a concern. Defense: The players are there for a good 2003 season. The line could be
something spectacular with a little more improvement with everything revolving around two great tackles. The back seven is
experienced, but not anything special compared to the top Big XII teams. Linebacker Brandon Brown could be a superstar.
6. Kansas (1-7, 3-9) - Offense: The offense showed signs of life last season moving the ball well at times. Quarterback Bill
Whittemore and running back Clark Green are two of the better, unknown talents in the Big XII. The line needs work with only
one returning starter and that one, junior guard Tony Coker, has a bad back. This will still be a work in progress, but it
could be fine as long as Whittemore and Green are healthy. Defense: As bad as the Kansas defense was last season, there's
hope for the future. It might not happen right away this year, but it should get better soon. It's asking a lot to improve by
leaps and bounds after giving up 42.2 points per game, but the KU D should be stronger as the young players of last year get
a little more experienced. Don't expect miracles, but they should be able to shave ten points off the average.
SOUTH
1. Texas (8-0 in Big XII, 12-0 overall) - Offense: Texas might have the best offense in America, but the skill players won't
be able to reach their potential if the young and inexperienced line doesn't come together. The quarterback situation will be
fine with Chance Mock and Vincent Young each able to lead the team without a problem. The running backs and receivers should
be killers. Defense: The defense loses three huge producers, but should be fine. The secondary will be one of the best in the
country with three returning starters, while the linebackers should be solid led by Derrick Johnson. The concern might be the
size on the ends other than Kaylen Thornton, but that shouldn't be too much of a problem with the huge players at tackle.
2. Oklahoma (7-1, 11-1) - Offense: The Sooners are going to find ways to score, but there aren't a lot of obvious stars. The
OU offense is set up by its fantastic defense with a premium placed on not turning the ball over and to take advantage of
great field position. There isn't a Quentin Griffin on the team, but the running game should be fine in Renaldo Works really
is as good as he looked at times this spring. The passing game might not be all that potent unless some of the talented
receivers finally realize their potential. The line should be excellent. Defense: This is the best defense in America. Nine
starters return to what was one of the best defenses in 2002, and it only gets stronger with the emergence of some great
prospects. With a little more of a pass rush from the ends and a little bit of tightening up in the pass defense, this could
be the best defense that college football has seen in several years.
3. Texas A&M (4-4, 7-5) - Offense: A&M's offense was dying before Dustin Long and Reggie McNeal took over. When Long blew up
for seven touchdown passes against Texas Tech, it might have sparked a new era of A&M football with an offense that actually
moves the ball. The running backs and receivers need to provide a little more of a spark. The offensive line will be strong
on the outside needing the guards to step up in the middle. Defense: Several top players need to be replaced and the depth
needs to be developed almost everywhere. Even so, Texas A&M, as always, has good defensive players and should be able to
adjust from the 3-4 to the 4-3 without too much of a problem. Defensive coordinator Carl Torbush is a good one and should
have this group humming.
4. Oklahoma State (3-5, 7-5) - Offense: If the tackles can come through and be dependable, there might not be any way to stop
this offense. Quarterback Jose Fields will once again put up some huge numbers throwing to the Woods brothers, while an
extremely talented stable of backs tear up defenses on the ground. Defense: The defense wasn't all that strong last year, and
that was with a ton of returning experience. It's never a good thing when you're counting on several true freshmen to play
big roles. The run defense should be fine, but the pass defense could have problems breaking in new corners and with few pass
rushing threats to put the pressure on.
5. Texas Tech (3-5, 5-7) - Offense: Tech won't be quite as potent without star quarterback Kliff Kingsbury, but everyone else
returns to what should be an explosive offense. With all four starting receivers returning and two great running backs
working behind a decent line, it'll all be up to quarterback B.J. Symons to run the show. He should do just fine. Defense:
Even with all the experienced talent and playmakers, the Texas Tech defense was worse last year than it was in 2001. Expect
an even bigger drop-off this year with a terrifyingly inexperienced front seven. The secondary has a great pair of safeties,
but the group isn't going to have problems against top passing teams.
6. Baylor (0-8, 2-10) - Offense: The hope is for more overall explosion with Guy Morriss and offensive coordinator Brent
Pease installing a more open passing attack. The Bears have enough decent receivers to make this interesting, but it'll take
a little while For a team that scored 11 points or less in seven games, they have to do whatever's possible to put points up
on the board. With an experienced group of skill players returning, that should be possible. Defense: Baylor's defense
couldn't stop anyone last season allowing 41.3 points and 405.2 yards per game. This year, seven starters return to a group
that should be more athletic, but not all that experienced with no developed depth and some injury concerns at a few key
spots. The tackles are starting from scratch, but they need to shine to take the pressure off the small and average
linebacking corps. Morriss compares his defense to Mississippi State's aggressive style.
Preview 2003
Conference USA Preview
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Southern Miss (8-0 in conference, 11-1 overall) - Offense: Southern Miss is changing up the offense to try and be more
explosive and get more big plays. Even with a Derrick Nix's 1,194-yard season, the running game was still a bit stale. The
average passing attack didn't help matters. The offensive line will be a work in progress all season long, but the skill
players should all be better than solid. Defense: The Southern Miss defense gave up 18.3 points and 336 yards per game. With
all of the stars returning, there's no reason to think the Eagles won't be just as good, if not better, this year. Forget
doing much anything against the huge hitting back seven. To nitpick, everyone needs to get a little stronger and a little
bigger, but every team wants to do that.
2. TCU (7-1, 10-2) - Offense: The running game will be magnificent with two outstanding backs running behind a solid line.
The passing game is a different story with several new faces at receiver and no real depth behind still-recovering Tye Gunn
at quarterback. Defense: The Horned Frogs lost several starters including star linebacker LaMarcus McDonald and top defensive
back Jason Goss, but there might not be much of a drop-off from the defense that dominated last year. This is a fast crew
with several all-star candidates. If they can to work together like last year's defense, there won't be much of a problem. If
nothing else, the TCU D will be one of the best in the nation at getting into the backfield.
T3. Cincinnati (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: UC should still be explosive even after losing most of its ammo. The Bearcats lose the
top four pass catchers, an all-star back DeMarco McCleskey and several top players on the line. It'll be a numbers game with
five running backs and six receivers looking to pick up the slack. The line isn't deep, but it should be strong inside with
two good guards and a rock at center. Defense: The defense isn't all that big, but it's fast, productive and should be very
good again. Even without a signature star like Antwan Peek, the Bearcats should be solid everywhere with good starters and
decent depth. The tackles are the only big concern.
T3. Louisville (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: The offensive line was a disaster last season, but it should be far better this year
with more experience and more depth. That's good news for a running game featuring superstar-to-be Eric Shelton. Stefan
LeFors and Justin Rascati are locked in a battle to replace star quarterback Dave Ragone, but they might simply be buying
time until superstar recruit Michael Bush joins the team. Defense: The defense never quite got the credit it deserved last
year, but it got strong as the season went on. Several top players are gone including Dewayne White, Anthony Floyd and Curry
Burns, so it'll be up to a few young guns to instantly star. The corners and linebacking corps will be great.
T3. Tulane (5-3, 7-5) - Offense: The Green Wave should explode. Ten starters return, and that doesn't count star receiver
Roydell Williams coming back from an early season injury. It'll all be up to the line. After giving up 42 sacks, it needs to
keep quarterback J.P. Losman clean so he has time to connect with his loaded receiving corps. Running back Mewelde Moore is
one of the best backs in college football. Defense: The defensive production improved last year by leaps and bounds allowing
120 fewer yards per game. With only three returning starters, the potential is there for a return to the dark times of the
Green Wave defense. There's great athleticism everywhere, but no depth on the line or secondary. The linebacking corps is
going to have to carry things for a while.
6. Memphis (4-4, 6-6) - Offense: The Tigers have the backfield to shine with a great quarterback and a wonderful stable of
backs, but the young receivers need to shine right away. The line will take a while to come together needing to replace four
starters. Defense: Memphis had a few problems making plays last year getting torched by most offenses with a pulse. The front
seven has to be more physical upfront, but they're experienced and could grow into something strong as the year goes on. The
blazing fast secondary will be fine if it can avoid injuries.
7. East Carolina (4-4, 4-8) - Offense: The potential is there for this to be a strong offense, but the passing game has to
come around. The line will be one of the best in the league and a devastating run blocking group to open holes for a great
group of backs. The receiving corps could be a big problem if no one steps up into the number one spot. That's not good news
for a quarterback, Paul Troth, that needs weapons to work with. Defense: Expect the production to be significantly better
under head coach John Thompson and defensive coordinator Jerry Odom. The defense will switch from a 3-4 to a more traditional
4-3 with several other new wrinkles added. The linebackers are light, but good. The secondary and line return a little bit of
game experience, but few big-time players.
8. UAB (3-5, 5-7) - Offense: The offense is full of athletes and full of young talent. Now it has to grow up. Quarterback
Darrell Hackney and receiver Roddy White could be the most dangerous pitch-and-catch combination in the league. The backs and
line are big and experienced, but each has to be more productive. Defense: New defensive coordinator Wayne Bolt has scrapped
the 4-2-5 defense for a more traditional 4-3. The players are there to make a dramatic turnaround in overall production with
a strong back seven and no concerns among the new starters. A pass rush needs to develop to help out the corners.
9. South Florida (2-6, 4-7) - Offense: USF might not have a Marquel Blackwell to carry the offense on his shoulders, but the
overall production might not slip with several good looking offensive players ready to shine. If quarterback Ronnie Banks
plays well, all should be fine with a deep corps of running backs, good young receivers, and a rising group of stars on the
line. Defense: The entire front four is gone along with star linebacker Kawika Mitchell and both corners. The defense won't
completely collapse with athletic prospects at each position, but the team will be backing on instant production from these
newcomers in key spots. The starting safety tandem is one of the best in America.
10. Houston (1-7, 3-9) - Offense: It'll be hard to be as explosive as it was last season with the loss of the top two
receivers and running back Joffrey Reynolds. Even so, there's enough talent here to move the ball with the best deep threats
returning in the passing game and several decent options at quarterback. If Barrick Nealy can return after tearing his ACL,
the offense should turn out to be fine. Defense: The defense gave up way too many points and was miserable against the pass.
The alignment has gone from a 4-2-5 to a 4-3 taking the pressure off the safeties so they don't have to make so many plays
against the run. The front seven should be a wall against average running teams, so the key will be for the corners to be
able to lock down.
11. Army (0-8, 0-12) - Offense: The running backs and receivers are relatively talented, but the Black Knights have to settle
the quarterback situation and has to pray that an inexperienced line can jell in a hurry. The offense only scored 18.8 points
per game last season and should be a bit more potent this year. Defense: The defense has better athletes than it's had in
years and now has to stop someone. Completely helpless last season, the Cadets gave up 40.9 points and 393 yards per game
last year failing to stop anyone. To be fair, much of the problem was due to an offense that never kept the chains moving,
but this year's defense has to be far stronger.
Comment