Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ace Ace NFL/CFB Plays

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kaptain, who cares if it's off $100 or 1 CENT...IF you followed, like many do (I guarantee he gets more hits than Michael Jackson or any web site or web personality) you'd see he's legit and has good records...maybe your intrepretation, but he's rock solid and wants all to win...no more, no less.
    FUCK YOU, FUCK ME

    Comment


    • I agree with seaored..........and I'm just a drifting lurker !!!!


      Good Luck !!!!!!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kaptain
        I appreciate the figure mule, but to me, they don't compute----kapt
        It does compute because he's 2-0 on $1000 plays, which is part of this number.

        Trust me, I don't get caught up in all the hype, but this guy can't fudge his records. He gets tens of thousands of hits, every week, in his threads.
        Every
        Villain
        Is
        Lemons

        Comment


        • Spear thanks for the picks and your great analysis, I for one appreciate all of your info.!
          5* 0-0
          4* 0-0
          3* 1-0
          2* 1-0
          1* 0-1


          God Bless America




          To win :1* unit = $100

          Comment


          • This guy is Mos Definitely the Real Deal.
            3-0 on his $2k plays this yr in the NFL so far. His specialty is the NFL. He rode the Steelers to the SB LY and made big bank. He has an awesome system.
            Just Win Baby!

            Comment


            • vinnyvegas

              Originally posted by vinnyvegas
              Kaptain, who cares if it's off $100 or 1 CENT...IF you followed, like many do (I guarantee he gets more hits than Michael Jackson or any web site or web personality) you'd see he's legit and has good records...maybe your intrepretation, but he's rock solid and wants all to win...no more, no less.
              vinny---I'm not questioning the guy and his ability to do picks.....I don't know him, I've heard of him through internet talk, don't follow him.......

              and I just happened to notice the figure of

              being 5-4 on $1100 plays and finishing up at +2395.00, despite what mule says, does not compute, and I was wondering if he posts his own record, or someone had tallied it for him.......

              If it was a 2K play, then it shouldn't have been shown in the $1100 area....

              Thats all I was saying----geez---fvkn relax.........I don't criticize cappers, and especially one I know nothing about.......

              If he's good, post his plays here, (he's not a service----not against the rules), follow em, let others decide if they want to.......

              Maybe I spend too much time with Math, I just happened to glance at that figure, and was wondering, and still am.......

              how do you go 5-4 on $1100 plays, and get to be +2395.00.....
              5 wins + 5k, 4 losses = -4.40K or +600.00...
              now lets assume that these no plays were at 2*, then you could add 1000 to each winner side.....
              1 of em = +1600
              2 of em = +2600

              you tell me it computes based on what is shown......

              Thats all I'm saying, asking, and I'm so damn sorry you guys took it the wrong way...I'll stay out of the thread and go about my business..........


              and to clarify your statement of "it may be my interpretation".....Interpretation of what......his picking or record keeping.......I reiterate, I don't question his picking abilities, or honesty, I questioned the figures as presented above, in the format presented, and I still do....

              It's simply the Math I questioned, and wondered if it was a misprint, mistake, or some formula the Poor Old "uneducated Kapt" has yet to learn.......

              You know me better than that.......you make it sound llike I'm nit picking, and you're 100% wrong.......

              Best to ya---relax, enjoy the games today, and I hope ACE hits everything he posts......what's it to me......kapt


              Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by jmarty6969


                hahahah chuck loves screwing with u guys and u guys are too stupid to know that if this was a tv show u all be punked
                I see you know me like a book!!
                Most of these kids are way too serious..

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Kaptain
                  and I just happened to notice the figure of

                  being 5-4 on $1100 plays and finishing up at +2395.00, despite what mule says, does not compute, and I was wondering if he posts his own record, or someone had tallied it for him.......

                  how do you go 5-4 on $1100 plays, and get to be +2395.00.....
                  5 wins + 5k, 4 losses = -4.40K or +600.00...
                  now lets assume that these no plays were at 2*, then you could add 1000 to each winner side.....
                  1 of em = +1600
                  2 of em = +2600

                  you tell me it computes based on what is shown......

                  Thats all I'm saying, asking, and I'm so damn sorry you guys took it the wrong way...I'll stay out of the thread and go about my business..........

                  Kappy, I do not know this guy and just heard of him two days ago, but I read the 'stats' to be NFL plays less than $1100, not all $1100 plays...so it could be for $1100 or it could be for $100 and anywhere in between...I don't know for sure but that is how I interpreted the info....
                  Three Jack's Record http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...10#post1323910

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Kaptain
                    vinny---I'm not questioning the guy and his ability to do picks.....I don't know him, I've heard of him through internet talk, don't follow him.......

                    and I just happened to notice the figure of

                    being 5-4 on $1100 plays and finishing up at +2395.00, despite what mule says, does not compute, and I was wondering if he posts his own record, or someone had tallied it for him.......

                    If it was a 2K play, then it shouldn't have been shown in the $1100 area....

                    Thats all I was saying----geez---fvkn relax.........I don't criticize cappers, and especially one I know nothing about.......

                    If he's good, post his plays here, (he's not a service----not against the rules), follow em, let others decide if they want to.......

                    Maybe I spend too much time with Math, I just happened to glance at that figure, and was wondering, and still am.......

                    how do you go 5-4 on $1100 plays, and get to be +2395.00.....
                    5 wins + 5k, 4 losses = -4.40K or +600.00...
                    now lets assume that these no plays were at 2*, then you could add 1000 to each winner side.....
                    1 of em = +1600
                    2 of em = +2600

                    you tell me it computes based on what is shown......

                    Thats all I'm saying, asking, and I'm so damn sorry you guys took it the wrong way...I'll stay out of the thread and go about my business..........


                    and to clarify your statement of "it may be my interpretation".....Interpretation of what......his picking or record keeping.......I reiterate, I don't question his picking abilities, or honesty, I questioned the figures as presented above, in the format presented, and I still do....

                    It's simply the Math I questioned, and wondered if it was a misprint, mistake, or some formula the Poor Old "uneducated Kapt" has yet to learn.......

                    You know me better than that.......you make it sound llike I'm nit picking, and you're 100% wrong.......

                    Best to ya---relax, enjoy the games today, and I hope ACE hits everything he posts......what's it to me......kapt
                    His under 1100 plays vary in amount. For example, any play for 1100 or under is tracked in there: 500, 600, 800 etc is included in there. The bet doesn't have to be for 1100. Hope that helps.

                    Comment


                    • threejack/molta02

                      Originally posted by molta02
                      His under 1100 plays vary in amount. For example, any play for 1100 or under is tracked in there: 500, 600, 800 etc is included in there. The bet doesn't have to be for 1100. Hope that helps.
                      My Bad----I galnced at the figure of 100 and FAILED to notice the less than..........It's my fault, I misread the English part, and it perked up my Math vision.........

                      I apologize for the error, and the statemnts regarding same.......

                      Thanks for the correction, and I must say, in a very professional and courteous manner........

                      My problem is "I went to Night School, and can't read and write in the Day time".......

                      so to
                      Vinny Vegas and
                      Rented Mule

                      MY apologies for mis interpreting the statement......but go easy on me next time......kapt


                      Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!

                      Comment


                      • Spearit

                        Originally posted by Spearit
                        Nice point Spark- I hate to post something after someone else has it. I also like the Bears and Cinncy today. Look forward to your picks as always.

                        My pick is on Balt/Cleveland Under.


                        Also this from another posted site. Interesting - did well on his systems last week- Lets monitor.

                        Situation #1
                        ==================================
                        Play Under - Any team where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points in a game involving two teams that had winning records last season, in conference games.

                        Games in this situation: Denver @ New England
                        Record this season is 8-0!
                        48-14 over the last 10 seasons with a winning percentage of 77.4%

                        Situation #2
                        ==================================
                        Play Against - Any team after allowing 6 points or less last game against opponent after scoring 7 points or less in the first half in 2 straight games.

                        Games in this situation: Baltimore @ Cleveland
                        Play Cleveland
                        No record this season.
                        66-25 over the last 10 seasons with a winning percentage of 72.5%

                        Situation #3
                        ==================================
                        Play Under - Any team against the total marginal winning team from last season (51% to 60%) playing a team that had a winning record, in conference games.

                        Games in this situation: Chicago @ Minnesota
                        Record this season is 2-1
                        87-37 since 1983 with a winning percentage of 70.2%

                        Situation #4
                        ==================================
                        Play Over - Road teams against the total after allowing 3 points or less in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 14 points or less last game

                        2 Games in this situation: St. Louis @ Arizona, Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh
                        Record this season: 1-0
                        57-21 over the last 5 season with a winning percentage of 73.1%

                        Situation #5
                        ==================================
                        Play Under - Any team where the total is between 42.5 and 49 points in a game involving two teams that had winning records last season

                        3 Games in this situation: Jacksonville @ Indy, Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh and NY Giants @ Seattle
                        Record this season: 4-0
                        32-8 over the last 5 seasons with a winning percentage of 80.0%

                        NOTE: Cincinnati is in an opposing situation #4, they are also in situation #7 favoring the under.

                        Situation #6
                        ==================================
                        Play Under - Any team against the total after being outgained by opp by 100 or more total yards last game against opponent after being outgained by 100 or more total yds 2 consecutive games

                        Games in this situation: Washington @ Houston
                        No record this season
                        28-6 over the last 10 seasons with a winning percentage of 82.4%

                        Situation #7 (Opposes #4, Supports #5)
                        ==================================
                        Play Under - Any team against the total off a road loss, in a game involving two teams that had winning records last season

                        2 Games in this situation: Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh, Carolina @ Tampa Bay
                        Record this season: 1-0
                        45-15 since 1983 with a winning percentage of 75%

                        MORE NOTES ON UNOPPOSED SS'S FROM LAST WEEK IN THE NFL:

                        Games

                        Oak +13 LOSER
                        Indy -13 WINNER
                        Cincinnati -10 WINNER
                        Buffalo U 37 WINNER
                        Carolina U 37 WINNER
                        NO -2 WINNER
                        KC +10.5 WINNER
                        KC Under 38 WINNER
                        Dal U 37 PUSH
                        Jac U 37.5 WINNER

                        8-1-1 - Monster Day!

                        Here is the record for these this season:

                        14-4-1 - Nice Profits There.

                        PLAYS FOR TODAY USING THIS SYSTEM IN ORDER OF STRENGH ARE:

                        Denver @ New England - Under
                        Baltimore @ Cleveland - Cleveland
                        Chicago @ Minnesota - Under
                        St. Louis @ Arizona - Over
                        Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh - NO PLAY
                        Jacksonville @ Indy - Under
                        NY. Giants @ Seattle - Under
                        Washington @ Houston - Under
                        Carolina @ Tampa Bay - Under


                        I am prolly going to lay on all of these but my personal faves are:

                        Denver, Jacksonville and Carolina

                        As always check your source to make sure that the lines fall in line with these SS's
                        Spearit----great work, as usual.....Sorry I cluttered up your thread with my erroneous takes.....best to ya----kapt


                        Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!

                        Comment


                        • deleted
                          Last edited by linemover; 09-24-2006, 02:43 PM.

                          Comment


                          • No Problem Kapt- Lets win some money and forget records and units won unless there is competition. I wish to make money and have some fun! Sounds simple but egos and accounting gets thrown in and folks start having their say and then the whole dang reason we're here is misconstrued. I believe all of us can help to make this site powerful and non-judgemental. I seldom post records unless I am on a tear. Good Luck to us all!!!
                            Last edited by Spearit; 09-24-2006, 02:48 PM.
                            "The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by linemover
                              deleted by me....LOL

                              I don't think this post was necessary.
                              Last edited by griffey_mojo; 09-24-2006, 02:48 PM.
                              It's always noon somewhere!

                              My Fish and Aquariums

                              Griffey's Posted Record

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by griffey_mojo
                                I don't think this post was necessary.
                                your right-I deleted it

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X