Kaptain, who cares if it's off $100 or 1 CENT...IF you followed, like many do (I guarantee he gets more hits than Michael Jackson or any web site or web personality) you'd see he's legit and has good records...maybe your intrepretation, but he's rock solid and wants all to win...no more, no less.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ace Ace NFL/CFB Plays
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by KaptainI appreciate the figure mule, but to me, they don't compute----kapt
Trust me, I don't get caught up in all the hype, but this guy can't fudge his records. He gets tens of thousands of hits, every week, in his threads.Every
Villain
Is
Lemons
Comment
-
vinnyvegas
Originally posted by vinnyvegasKaptain, who cares if it's off $100 or 1 CENT...IF you followed, like many do (I guarantee he gets more hits than Michael Jackson or any web site or web personality) you'd see he's legit and has good records...maybe your intrepretation, but he's rock solid and wants all to win...no more, no less.
and I just happened to notice the figure of
being 5-4 on $1100 plays and finishing up at +2395.00, despite what mule says, does not compute, and I was wondering if he posts his own record, or someone had tallied it for him.......
If it was a 2K play, then it shouldn't have been shown in the $1100 area....
Thats all I was saying----geez---fvkn relax.........I don't criticize cappers, and especially one I know nothing about.......
If he's good, post his plays here, (he's not a service----not against the rules), follow em, let others decide if they want to.......
Maybe I spend too much time with Math, I just happened to glance at that figure, and was wondering, and still am.......
how do you go 5-4 on $1100 plays, and get to be +2395.00.....
5 wins + 5k, 4 losses = -4.40K or +600.00...
now lets assume that these no plays were at 2*, then you could add 1000 to each winner side.....
1 of em = +1600
2 of em = +2600
you tell me it computes based on what is shown......
Thats all I'm saying, asking, and I'm so damn sorry you guys took it the wrong way...I'll stay out of the thread and go about my business..........
and to clarify your statement of "it may be my interpretation".....Interpretation of what......his picking or record keeping.......I reiterate, I don't question his picking abilities, or honesty, I questioned the figures as presented above, in the format presented, and I still do....
It's simply the Math I questioned, and wondered if it was a misprint, mistake, or some formula the Poor Old "uneducated Kapt" has yet to learn.......
You know me better than that.......you make it sound llike I'm nit picking, and you're 100% wrong.......
Best to ya---relax, enjoy the games today, and I hope ACE hits everything he posts......what's it to me......kapt
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kaptainand I just happened to notice the figure of
being 5-4 on $1100 plays and finishing up at +2395.00, despite what mule says, does not compute, and I was wondering if he posts his own record, or someone had tallied it for him.......
how do you go 5-4 on $1100 plays, and get to be +2395.00.....
5 wins + 5k, 4 losses = -4.40K or +600.00...
now lets assume that these no plays were at 2*, then you could add 1000 to each winner side.....
1 of em = +1600
2 of em = +2600
you tell me it computes based on what is shown......
Thats all I'm saying, asking, and I'm so damn sorry you guys took it the wrong way...I'll stay out of the thread and go about my business..........
Three Jack's Record http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...10#post1323910
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kaptainvinny---I'm not questioning the guy and his ability to do picks.....I don't know him, I've heard of him through internet talk, don't follow him.......
and I just happened to notice the figure of
being 5-4 on $1100 plays and finishing up at +2395.00, despite what mule says, does not compute, and I was wondering if he posts his own record, or someone had tallied it for him.......
If it was a 2K play, then it shouldn't have been shown in the $1100 area....
Thats all I was saying----geez---fvkn relax.........I don't criticize cappers, and especially one I know nothing about.......
If he's good, post his plays here, (he's not a service----not against the rules), follow em, let others decide if they want to.......
Maybe I spend too much time with Math, I just happened to glance at that figure, and was wondering, and still am.......
how do you go 5-4 on $1100 plays, and get to be +2395.00.....
5 wins + 5k, 4 losses = -4.40K or +600.00...
now lets assume that these no plays were at 2*, then you could add 1000 to each winner side.....
1 of em = +1600
2 of em = +2600
you tell me it computes based on what is shown......
Thats all I'm saying, asking, and I'm so damn sorry you guys took it the wrong way...I'll stay out of the thread and go about my business..........
and to clarify your statement of "it may be my interpretation".....Interpretation of what......his picking or record keeping.......I reiterate, I don't question his picking abilities, or honesty, I questioned the figures as presented above, in the format presented, and I still do....
It's simply the Math I questioned, and wondered if it was a misprint, mistake, or some formula the Poor Old "uneducated Kapt" has yet to learn.......
You know me better than that.......you make it sound llike I'm nit picking, and you're 100% wrong.......
Best to ya---relax, enjoy the games today, and I hope ACE hits everything he posts......what's it to me......kapt
Comment
-
threejack/molta02
Originally posted by molta02His under 1100 plays vary in amount. For example, any play for 1100 or under is tracked in there: 500, 600, 800 etc is included in there. The bet doesn't have to be for 1100. Hope that helps.
I apologize for the error, and the statemnts regarding same.......
Thanks for the correction, and I must say, in a very professional and courteous manner........
My problem is "I went to Night School, and can't read and write in the Day time".......
so to
Vinny Vegas and
Rented Mule
MY apologies for mis interpreting the statement......but go easy on me next time......kapt
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
-
Spearit
Originally posted by SpearitNice point Spark- I hate to post something after someone else has it. I also like the Bears and Cinncy today. Look forward to your picks as always.
My pick is on Balt/Cleveland Under.
Also this from another posted site. Interesting - did well on his systems last week- Lets monitor.
Situation #1
==================================
Play Under - Any team where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points in a game involving two teams that had winning records last season, in conference games.
Games in this situation: Denver @ New England
Record this season is 8-0!
48-14 over the last 10 seasons with a winning percentage of 77.4%
Situation #2
==================================
Play Against - Any team after allowing 6 points or less last game against opponent after scoring 7 points or less in the first half in 2 straight games.
Games in this situation: Baltimore @ Cleveland
Play Cleveland
No record this season.
66-25 over the last 10 seasons with a winning percentage of 72.5%
Situation #3
==================================
Play Under - Any team against the total marginal winning team from last season (51% to 60%) playing a team that had a winning record, in conference games.
Games in this situation: Chicago @ Minnesota
Record this season is 2-1
87-37 since 1983 with a winning percentage of 70.2%
Situation #4
==================================
Play Over - Road teams against the total after allowing 3 points or less in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 14 points or less last game
2 Games in this situation: St. Louis @ Arizona, Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh
Record this season: 1-0
57-21 over the last 5 season with a winning percentage of 73.1%
Situation #5
==================================
Play Under - Any team where the total is between 42.5 and 49 points in a game involving two teams that had winning records last season
3 Games in this situation: Jacksonville @ Indy, Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh and NY Giants @ Seattle
Record this season: 4-0
32-8 over the last 5 seasons with a winning percentage of 80.0%
NOTE: Cincinnati is in an opposing situation #4, they are also in situation #7 favoring the under.
Situation #6
==================================
Play Under - Any team against the total after being outgained by opp by 100 or more total yards last game against opponent after being outgained by 100 or more total yds 2 consecutive games
Games in this situation: Washington @ Houston
No record this season
28-6 over the last 10 seasons with a winning percentage of 82.4%
Situation #7 (Opposes #4, Supports #5)
==================================
Play Under - Any team against the total off a road loss, in a game involving two teams that had winning records last season
2 Games in this situation: Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh, Carolina @ Tampa Bay
Record this season: 1-0
45-15 since 1983 with a winning percentage of 75%
MORE NOTES ON UNOPPOSED SS'S FROM LAST WEEK IN THE NFL:
Games
Oak +13 LOSER
Indy -13 WINNER
Cincinnati -10 WINNER
Buffalo U 37 WINNER
Carolina U 37 WINNER
NO -2 WINNER
KC +10.5 WINNER
KC Under 38 WINNER
Dal U 37 PUSH
Jac U 37.5 WINNER
8-1-1 - Monster Day!
Here is the record for these this season:
14-4-1 - Nice Profits There.
PLAYS FOR TODAY USING THIS SYSTEM IN ORDER OF STRENGH ARE:
Denver @ New England - Under
Baltimore @ Cleveland - Cleveland
Chicago @ Minnesota - Under
St. Louis @ Arizona - Over
Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh - NO PLAY
Jacksonville @ Indy - Under
NY. Giants @ Seattle - Under
Washington @ Houston - Under
Carolina @ Tampa Bay - Under
I am prolly going to lay on all of these but my personal faves are:
Denver, Jacksonville and Carolina
As always check your source to make sure that the lines fall in line with these SS's
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
-
No Problem Kapt- Lets win some money and forget records and units won unless there is competition. I wish to make money and have some fun! Sounds simple but egos and accounting gets thrown in and folks start having their say and then the whole dang reason we're here is misconstrued. I believe all of us can help to make this site powerful and non-judgemental. I seldom post records unless I am on a tear. Good Luck to us all!!!Last edited by Spearit; 09-24-2006, 02:48 PM."The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by linemoverdeleted by me....LOL
I don't think this post was necessary.Last edited by griffey_mojo; 09-24-2006, 02:48 PM.
Comment
Comment