Confiremd Ncaa Plays Week #1 (update #3)

[10DimeBry]

Get your bitch ass in the service section!!!!

[10DimeBry]

fuck it, i'm calling doc he'll fix this in a jiffy

[Sports Guru]

This is so funny to me. Monte we spoke on AOL messenger. And in the past I have "one this forum" released my larger plays so any assertion to the contrary is bullshit.

I just do not "hype" games and tell you Game of year, week, month or that other bullshit. Last year I released close to 90% of ALL my plays to you guys. Its early in the season so a 2* is all that was warrented in this early season.

I already have a 3* for next weeks NFL comming soon.

[DIRK]

bet against rutgers hmmm

[DIRK]

gl, man i dunno shit bout cfl
hope you go undefeated.

[MtrCtyPimp]

I would follow this guy.......this post alone looked like it took 30-35 hours

PEACE

[KazDog]

Thanks for coming back Guru. Others as well as myself think you and your write-ups are an asset to the forum. I think Bry missed his 12 pack of McMuffins this morning. It tends to make him cranky.....Great start last night! Let's have a great football season

KAZ

[molta02]

GL and thanks for the write ups and insight. I appreciate it and use it. Nice job last nite too.

[jcindaville]

fuck it, i'm calling doc he'll fix this in a jiffy

Bryan, i think this dude is ok. Spark doesnt seem to have an issue with him, and if Spark thinks he's ok, then good in my book

[catjuggler]

thanks for the excellent write-ups you changed my mind on the UNC-Rutgers game.

catjuggler

[10DimeBry]

Bryan, i think this dude is ok. Spark doesnt seem to have an issue with him, and if Spark thinks he's ok, then good in my book

bro your missing my point. i dont have a issue with Sports guru. But he is a service selling a product. That is fact. all i'm saying is rules are rules. GET in the Service section. GEEZ. i read Sports Guru's stuff too. i dont have a issue with him. its not about SG.......look deeper into this JC i know you are smarter than that

[Sports Guru]

To all you who follow me...let me help out a little more. Its always a good idea to look at the % of money on a certain team and the line movement. Those resources can be found for free in lots of places. Last nights Boston college game had almost a 9-1 differential on bets comming in on BC yet the line moved down...not up. So say thats because the smart "heavy" money was on the other side but that is not the case. Book have been ballsy and taken stands on a game moving the line opposite to where the money is comming in. Those game most certainly are public defeats. Hope that helps.

[jcindaville]

bro your missing my point. i dont have a issue with Sports guru. But he is a service selling a product. That is fact. all i'm saying is rules are rules. GET in the Service section. GEEZ. i read Sports Guru's stuff too. i dont have a issue with him. its not about SG.......look deeper into this JC i know you are smarter than that

There is another service that is allowed to post outside the realm of the service section. And if Monte dont care, i cant understand why it bothers you so much. That's all, cant figure out why your so upset

[KazDog]

I agree JC....Rook is allowed in here with the concept of NO hype and he always adhere's to that. So Guru does the same thing. Where is the problem? I've NEVER seen him hype in here. Just good info that's VERY useful to capping a game. Why are we here? To try and beat the book. If he's giving good info, why kick him out? JMO...Thanks again for the info Guru

KAZ

[TheRook]

I agree JC....Rook is allowed in here with the concept of NO hype and he always adhere's to that. So Guru does the same thing. Where is the problem? I've NEVER seen him hype in here. Just good info that's VERY useful to capping a game. Why are we here? To try and beat the book. If he's giving good info, why kick him out? JMO...Thanks again for the info Guru

KAZ

First off...thanks Kaz...appreciate that.

But please don't compare me with Guru. As similar as we are...we have very different intentions here.

Please respect the fact that I don't want to be mentioned in the same breath with him.

thanks