Just wondered what everyone's take on it was (and honestly looking to waste some time at work today).
Reading Len Pasquarelli's 20 reasons for pro football vs. Ivan Maisel's 20 reasons for college football I noticed one thing.
Ivan writes about why the game is better, Len spends most of his article telling you why the city, cheerleaders, mascots, etc are better.
For what it's worth, I think Ivan makes a much better arguement and being a college football addict agree with his stance....
Thoughts??
Reading Len Pasquarelli's 20 reasons for pro football vs. Ivan Maisel's 20 reasons for college football I noticed one thing.
Ivan writes about why the game is better, Len spends most of his article telling you why the city, cheerleaders, mascots, etc are better.
For what it's worth, I think Ivan makes a much better arguement and being a college football addict agree with his stance....
Thoughts??
Comment