July 8th ---17 out of 19 Winning Days in MLB and Counting

[ChuckLazar]

Ufc

10
Heavyweight Fight
Frank Mir vs Dan Christison

6) Dan Christison +266


20
Lightweight bout
Yves Edwards vs Joe Stevenson

9) Yves Edwards -198

Andrei Arlovski vs Tim Sylvia
1) Andrei Arlovski -257


Tito Ortiz vs Ken Shamrock
3) Tito Ortiz -468


5
Josh Neer vs Josh Burkman

7) Josh Neer +103

[BigWeiner]

3 runs in the top of the 5th, awesome!!

[WayneChung]

nice call on twinkies for first 5 innings-i'm passing on ufc because i can't watch the fights but tito is stealing -460 later brother !!

[Brady22]

we got screwed twice today............first the astros and now the under in the colo game..........that sucks..............

[JimmyBlaze]

Keep posting tips chuck, and why don't you and Kappa befriend each other. No need for all this agression.

[pauliewalnuts]

Thanks for the MN winner tonight!

[Spearit]

Nice POD hit - Thanx

[thesandman]

Chuck. As soon as I saw your post, I said to myself, he's going to get the same crap I got when I asked the same question. And that's what happened. A few jerks thinking you post just for the attention but mostly replies from guys you didn't even know follow your plays. I put a lot of effort into my picks, just as you do and if no one is playing them, you are right, why continue. I know we both win for people and now you know guys are winning with you. The ones that are so concerned that you are seeking attention, are the ones who bitch and moan when their own plays keep losing. Just keep doing what you are doing.

[KazDog]

Sandman.....You and Chuck need to realize that by the mere fact that you guys are getting hundred's of views, means that people are playing your picks. Why is that so hard to understand?

Chuck said his comment to start the post had nothing to do with how many views he gets but more so if anyone is using his picks. Amount of views in my eyes means amount of people using the plays to a certain extent. People are not coming into either of your threads just to read who says good luck....You may get 20 saying good luck, but 300 plus views.

There's only a select few here who get several hundred views on posted plays. You and Chuck are included in those few.You both should feel honored and not put off.

I appreciate the effort you both put in and many times I use a consensus type of play gathering....

But there is no doubt in my mind that guys are playing yours and Chuck's picks....I think that should be fairly obvious. JMO

PEACE....KAZ

[ChuckLazar]

Sandman.....You and Chuck need to realize that by the mere fact that you guys are getting hundred's of views, means that people are playing your picks. Why is that so hard to understand?

Chuck said his comment to start the post had nothing to do with how many views he gets but more so if anyone is using his picks. Amount of views in my eyes means amount of people using the plays to a certain extent. People are not coming into either of your threads just to read who says good luck....You may get 20 saying good luck, but 300 plus views.

There's only a select few here who get several hundred views on posted plays. You and Chuck are included in those few.You both should feel honored and not put off.

I appreciate the effort you both put in and many times I use a consensus type of play gathering....

But there is no doubt in my mind that guys are playing yours and Chuck's picks....I think that should be fairly obvious. JMO

PEACE....KAZ

I appreciate your comments, but lets please put this to rest!!!

[KazDog]

I agree Chuck....Good luck and let's go golf sometime. I may be in your neighborhood in a couple of weeks. I live in Central Calif

KAZ

[bover1]

I appreciate your comments, but lets please put this to rest!!!

THEY SHOULD LOCK THIS THREAD ALREADY........... THE PARTYS OVER.......

[ChuckLazar]

I agree Chuck....Good luck and let's go golf sometime. I may be in your neighborhood in a couple of weeks. I live in Central Calif

KAZ

Sounds good!!

[thesandman]

KazDog said

Sandman.....You and Chuck need to realize that by the mere fact that you guys are getting hundred's of views, means that people are playing your picks. Why is that so hard to understand?

KazDog. I know you meant well, but I don't see where I said people are not playing my picks. You might have thought when I said "if no one is playing our/your picks, why continue" meant that I didn't think people are playing my picks. No, I just meant in general if someone is posting picks that no one follows, sure, why continue, but I wasen't referring to myself. Now, when football starts, I hope I can find somebody to follow whose picks keep winning, because I suck in football.

[KazDog]

That makes sense. But I thought when you said, "he's going to get the same crap I got when I asked the same question." That you were referring to the fact that no one was playing your picks.....If that's incorrect, it's my mistake and thanks for clarifying....Good luck to you too Sandy. If you're winning, I'm winning!

KAZ