Pick your favorite play
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NFC Semis: Seahawks/Bears
Collapse
X
-
Wow i gotta go with the packers also.i was pulling for philly bad yesterday because as a falcon fan i did not want to play green bay.i would have rather played seattle."of course" lol.i was even hoping to play new orleans the team i did not want to face is the packers.green bay has about the same type of team as atlanta excep[t maybe the only edge i can give atlanta is at the running back position.i am hoping that the falcons play a defense where they only rush 3 and keep the ball out of rodgers hands forcing the packers to bveat us on the ground.this is a bad matchup for the falcons so gotta go with the packers +1MLB 2012***100-98 +$215 OR +2.15 UNITS
HUGE PLAYS 2-1
NFL 2011-2012** 6-10
0-0TOP PLAYS
NCAA FBL 2011-2012**** 26-23
4-1 TOP PLAYS
GOY 33-12 ALL SPORTS
AS of 6/3/12
Comment
-
Bears......prob gonna be my biggest investment of the post season, Bears have the revenge factor, weather may be a factor prob a high of 20 degrees, field is in horrible condition, which the Bears are used to playing on, seattle has only won 2 road games all year{yes i know one was against the bears} things could change from now till Sunday but as of now Bears big time
Comment
-
I don't get all the love for the Packers. Well, I get it, but I think it is misguided. Admittedly I'm a big Falcons fan and I'm glad everyone seems to be hitting the Pack, but what am I missing here? I understand Joe Public likes the Pack b/c they have been on TV a bunch the last few weeks and won some must win games, but what about the fact that they were in must win games down the stretch? You are in must win games b/c you are a marginal playoff team. This is a team the Falcons already beat. This is a team that can't run the ball........it is so funny to me that Starks has one good game against a very underwhelming Eagles D and everyone thinks the Pack have all the sudden found a running game. I apologize if ONE good game against a marginal D doesn't convince me.
I understand the Falcons aren't a flashy team and people like to bet the flashy teams, but goodness, this is a 13-3 team whose only loses were to playoff teams....Pitt, Saints, and Philly. Green Bay's losses....Chicago, Dolphins (terrible), Redskins (terrible), ATLANTA, Detroit (terrible), and Pats. The Falcons don't do much great, but do everything well. Good passing game, good running game, good run D, good pass D, good special teams. Oh yeah, Matt Ryan is 20-2 at home in his career. Falcons stomped the Seahawks a few weeks back, beat Saints in New Orleans, beat a good Tampa team twice, beat the Ravens, beat the Packers. Oh yeah, the Falcons are probably the healthiest team around and have two weeks of rest.
Everyone keep betting up the Pack and get me better value on the Birds.Last edited by harold_bush; 01-12-2011, 12:38 PM.
Comment
-
They are thinking that because the packers outgained them by 120 yards and moved the ball on them pretty easy. A few penalties and a fumble on the goaline changed that game. So I am guessing the packers will continue to put up 400 plus a game in offense and people don't think Atlanta can do the same against their D. Atlanta is not that scary of a team to face.Hoops
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hoopster007 View PostThey are thinking that because the packers outgained them by 120 yards and moved the ball on them pretty easy. A few penalties and a fumble on the goaline changed that game. So I am guessing the packers will continue to put up 400 plus a game in offense and people don't think Atlanta can do the same against their D. Atlanta is not that scary of a team to face.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DenJamTuck View PostAtlanta kind of reminds me of the Seattle Mariners of years ago ,when they won 113 games during the season.Great regular season,but unfortunatedly out in the 1st round.I feel like the Packers are a team of destiny for some strange reason(IMO)...go figure
I think a lot of people are also knocking the Falcons for that loss on MNF against the Saints.Last edited by harold_bush; 01-12-2011, 04:06 PM.
Comment
Comment