Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Illinois faces 66 percent tax boost amid budget crisis

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Illinois faces 66 percent tax boost amid budget crisis

    SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – Democratic Illinois lawmakers beat a looming deadline and approved a 66 percent income-tax increase in a desperate bid to end the state's crippling budget crisis.

    Legislative leaders rushed early Wednesday to pass the politically risky plan before a new General Assembly was sworn in at noon, taking a slice out of the Democratic majority and removing lame-duck lawmakers willing to support the tax before leaving office.

    The rate increase might be the biggest any state has adopted in percentage terms while grappling with recent economic woes. Nevertheless, Illinois' tax rate would remain lower than in several other states in the region.

    The increase now goes to Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, who supports the plan to temporarily raise the personal tax rate to 5 percent, a two-thirds increase from the current 3 percent rate. Corporate taxes also would climb as part of the effort to close a budget hole that could hit $15 billion this year.

    "Governor Quinn today thanks the Illinois General Assembly for taking strong action to confront our fiscal crisis and provide the revenue and reforms needed to stabilize the budget, pay our bills and jumpstart Illinois' economy," a statement from his office said.

    Quinn's office said the higher taxes will generate about $6.8 billion a year — a major increase by any measure.

    It will be coupled with strict 2 percent limits on spending growth. If officials spend above those limits, the tax increase will automatically be canceled. The plan's supporters warned that rising pension and health care costs probably will eat up all the spending allowed by the caps, forcing cuts in other areas of government.

    [Related: California governor seeks to extend tax increase]

    Other pieces of the budget plan failed.

    Lawmakers rejected a $1-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes, which would have provided money for schools. They also blocked a plan to borrow $8.7 billion to pay off overdue bills, which means long-suffering businesses and social-service agencies won't get their money anytime soon.

    House Speaker Michael Madigan, sounding weary, said Republicans should have supported some parts of the plan instead of voting against everything.

    "They're on the sidelines. They don't want to get on the field of play," the Chicago Democrat said. "I'm happy that the day has ended."

    But Republicans noted they were not included in negotiations. They also fundamentally reject the idea of raising taxes after years of spending growth.

    "We're saying to the people of Illinois, 'For eight years we've overspent, now we're going to make it your problem,'" said Rep. Roger Eddy. "We're making up for our mistakes on your back."

    The increase means an Illinois resident who now owes $1,000 in state income taxes will pay $1,666 at the new rate. After four years, the rate drops to 4 percent and that same taxpayer will then owe $1,333.

    Republicans predict the tax eventually will be made permanent.

    "It's a cruel hoax to play on citizens to say this is temporary," said House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego.

    Democrats bristled at being blamed for the state's financial problems, although they've controlled the governor's office and both legislative chambers since 2003.

    They said some of the problem began under Republican governors and that Republicans backed some budgets that increased spending. They argued the national recession sent state revenues into a nosedive and that Democrats already have cut spending by billions of dollars.

    "This mess is a mess that is the responsibility of all of us as Republicans and Democrats, of several different governors and part of the mess isn't even anybody's fault," said House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago.

    The new tax money will balance the state's annual budget and let officials begin chipping away at the backlog of unpaid bills. Borrowing money, and then repaying it with a portion of the tax increase, would have allowed those bills to be paid immediately, aiding organizations that provide services for the state but go months without being reimbursed.

    The delay and the spending limits are "very troubling" to those groups, said Sean Noble, policy director for Voices for Illinois Children, a member of the statewide Responsible Budget Coalition. Still, he called the tax increase "an enormous step" toward putting Illinois on sound financial footing.

    The proposal passed the House on Tuesday night 60-57, the bare minimum. No Republicans backed the measure there or in the Senate, where the measure passed 30-29.

    The governor has refused to discuss the tax proposal publicly, although his aides say he supports it. During his election campaign, Quinn promised to veto any tax plan higher than his proposal for a 1-point increase.

    Republicans accused Democrats of doing irreparable harm to Illinois families and businesses. Business leaders decried the proposal as a job-killer.

    "Based on this particular legislation the only businesses that will benefit are the moving companies that will be helping many of my members move out of this particular state," said Gregory Baise, head of the Illinois Manufacturers' Association.

    [Related: Major organization backs Idaho cigarette tax increase]

    Democrats countered that even with the increase, Illinois' tax rate will be lower than in many neighboring states — Iowa's top rate is 8.98 percent, Wisconsin's is 7.75 percent. They also maintain that without more money, state government may not be able to pay employees by the end of the year. Major government services might have to be halted, they warn, and groups waiting for state payments will go under.

    Spending limits were added to the plan to win the support of some suburban Democrats. Republicans said the limits don't do enough to clamp down.

    The limits allow next year's spending to increase considerably so the state can make its required contribution to government retirement systems, pay overdue bills and cover other costs that had been shoved aside. After that, however, spending could not grow more than 2 percent annually for the next three years or else the tax increase would be reversed.

    "We're really trying to handcuff ourselves and the governor in our spending," said Illinois Senate President John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat.

  • #2
    For the life of me I can not understand how anyone in Illinois can vote Dem. .... The voters in Illinois should be ashamed of themselves.

    Comment


    • #3
      Quinn, Illinois lawmakers push 75 percent income tax increase - chicagotribune.com

      Comment


      • #4
        So they have been paying lower taxes, now they are being asked to pay the same, no still less than others, to bail themselves out of debt?

        The rate increase might be the biggest any state has adopted in percentage terms while grappling with recent economic woes. Nevertheless, Illinois' tax rate would remain lower than in several other states in the region.
        Let's Hammer the Book.

        Comment


        • #5
          as long as they keep the pensions for labor unions...teachers, govt, manufacturing....it will never change.

          Chicago = New Jack City

          Comment


          • #6
            Those damn teachers, take the only thing that keeps them somewhat competitive in the professional market.
            Let's Hammer the Book.

            Comment


            • #7
              Illinois Passes A Huge 66% Tax Hike, And Governors Around The Country Are Making Fun Of It





              Image: AP


              Poor Illinois. It's taken over the mantle as the state that everyone thinks is the most screwed.



              Faced with a monster budget gap, the state Senate just passed a monster 66% hike in the state income tax.


              The news has governors or other states gleeful.

              Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels said today that the tax hike was good for... Indiana


              And during his State of the State address, New Jersey governor Chris Christie held up Illinois as a state that was going in the wrong direction.



              Chicago readers, any plans to move?

              Click here to see the 15 states with the worst deficits >

              Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/illin...#ixzz1AlvUFRua

              Comment


              • #8
                Illinois Democrats Tax Plan:

                Renewed Life, or Nail In The Coffin?


                By Fritz Pfister
                January 8, 2010



                Headline in today’s SJR Business section: "Bernanke optimistic on unemployment." Whoever wrote the headlines needs to be charged with journalistic malfeasance. Quoting the first paragraph of the AP article; "Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke sketched a more optimistic view of the economy Friday but said the Fed’s $600 billion bond-buying program is needed because unemployment will likely stay elevated for up to five more years."



                We need to print money out of thin air increasing the risk for a bond crisis that would result in hyperinflation and economic chaos while unemployment is going to stay high for another five years. You call that optimistic? I think not.



                Here’s a quiz for you. If the state raises corporate taxes 75% will businesses be more or less likely to hire? If the personal income tax is raised 75% will people be more or less likely to spend? Will cutting spending raise or lower the state’s deficit? Will a 75% increase in taxes raise or lower business and consumer confidence?

                All through the campaign Democratic Gubernatorial candidate Quinn ran on a plan to raise taxes 1% which equals a 33% increase in the income tax. Due to the State Constitutional requirements corporate taxes would have to be increased proportionately.

                The Democrats won. Therefore it would be a reasonable expectation that the majority of Illinoisans gave permission for a 33% tax increase. What did Madigan and Cullerton propose? A 75% increase in personal income taxes from 3% to 5.25%, corporate taxes from 4.8% to 8.4%, to borrow $8.5 billion, to limit spending to 1% increases over the next several years, a no new programs pledge, and that the tax increases would be rolled back in four years.



                After campaigning on a much lesser increase and then violating that campaign promise why would any reasonable person trust the Democratic Party that they would roll back the tax rate?


                There is no question the state is in a complete financial mess, but who got us there? Who played Santa Claus with no way to pay for their goodies to buy votes? Who misled the people about the costs of programs? Why are we in such a predicament? Because the politicians running this state continued to spend more than they were taking in, even after the financial meltdown. Shear economic negligence and now they want to punish the people for their blatantly incompetent actions.


                The most egregious part of the plan defies common sense and even decency. They fail to make any spending cuts guaranteeing we will be right back where we are today when the time comes to roll back the tax rate. This is not a Madoff, Enrontype scheme - it is worse; it is the grandest bait and switch con in Illinois history. Enriching the powerful, enslaving the people.

                Dr. Lawrence Yun, chief economist for The National Association of Realtors, says in order to reduce deficits without harming the economy is to have $4 to $5 dollars in spending cuts for every dollar in tax increases.


                The Cullerton, Madigan, Democratic plan calls for economic harm on top


                of their economic mishandling of the peoples money and trust.



                The easy way out is to simply tax and borrow. Every representative who votes for this plan is a coward...

                Comment

                Working...
                X