posted by: Jessica Pieklo 2 days ago
For all those Republicans campaigning on a platform of repealing health care reform, perhaps now is a good time to offer a reminder of the kind of practices the legislation eradicated. The Los Angeles times is reporting that prosecutors are preparing a case against WellPoint Insurance for falsely stating that it had changed its procedures for canceling the policies of patients after they became sick. This process known as rescission effectively left many customers without insurance after developing a chronic condition such as cancer and no means of paying for their care, or, given their diagnosis, no ability to get additional insurance.
WellPoint's disgusting practice first came to light in connection with reports that the company had used a computer algorithm to rescind the policies of women once they were diagnosed with breast cancer. After a litany of bad press reports and public shaming WellPoint promised its policy had changed. But that was apparently not the case.
According to prosecutors, WellPoint continued to target women with breast cancer for rescission, even after the federal healthcare law took effect. Under health care reform, the only allowable basis for rescission of a policy is if the insured lied in the application. Prosecutors believe that WellPoint simply looked for sick clients and kicked them off their policies.
There's only one reason why an insurance company would take away the policy of an insured, and that is if they actually had to being paying out benefits under that policy. The importance of health care reform was to remind insurance companies that they are in the business of paying benefits, not just collecting premiums. It would appear that WellPoint didn't get that memo.
Read more: politics, insurance, breast cancer, health care, WellPoint, rescission
For all those Republicans campaigning on a platform of repealing health care reform, perhaps now is a good time to offer a reminder of the kind of practices the legislation eradicated. The Los Angeles times is reporting that prosecutors are preparing a case against WellPoint Insurance for falsely stating that it had changed its procedures for canceling the policies of patients after they became sick. This process known as rescission effectively left many customers without insurance after developing a chronic condition such as cancer and no means of paying for their care, or, given their diagnosis, no ability to get additional insurance.
WellPoint's disgusting practice first came to light in connection with reports that the company had used a computer algorithm to rescind the policies of women once they were diagnosed with breast cancer. After a litany of bad press reports and public shaming WellPoint promised its policy had changed. But that was apparently not the case.
According to prosecutors, WellPoint continued to target women with breast cancer for rescission, even after the federal healthcare law took effect. Under health care reform, the only allowable basis for rescission of a policy is if the insured lied in the application. Prosecutors believe that WellPoint simply looked for sick clients and kicked them off their policies.
There's only one reason why an insurance company would take away the policy of an insured, and that is if they actually had to being paying out benefits under that policy. The importance of health care reform was to remind insurance companies that they are in the business of paying benefits, not just collecting premiums. It would appear that WellPoint didn't get that memo.
Read more: politics, insurance, breast cancer, health care, WellPoint, rescission
Comment