Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Judge blocks Gulf offshore drilling moratorium

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Judge blocks Gulf offshore drilling moratorium

    AP – Gulf oil could impact fish shelter, food source

    NEW ORLEANS – A federal judge on Tuesday blocked a six-month moratorium on new deepwater drilling projects imposed after the massive Gulf oil spill.

    The White House promised an immediate appeal. President Barack Obama's administration had halted approval of any new permits for deepwater drilling and suspended drilling of 33 exploratory wells in the Gulf.

    Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama believes strongly that drilling at such depths does not make any sense and puts the safety of workers "at a danger that the president does not believe we can afford."

    Several companies that ferry people and supplies and provide other services to offshore drilling rigs asked U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans to overturn the moratorium, arguing it was arbitrarily imposed.

    Feldman agreed, saying in his ruling the Interior Department assumed that because one rig failed, all companies and rigs doing deepwater drilling pose an imminent danger.

    "The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is an unprecedented, sad, ugly and inhuman disaster," he wrote. "What seems clear is that the federal government has been pressed by what happened on the Deepwater Horizon into an otherwise sweeping confirmation that all Gulf deepwater drilling activities put us all in a universal threat of irreparable harm."

    The moratorium was imposed after the April 20 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig that killed 11 workers and blew out the well 5,000 feet underwater that has spewed millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf.

    The Interior Department said it needed time to study the risks of deepwater drilling. But the lawsuit filed by Hornbeck Offshore Services of Covington, La., claimed there was no proof the other operations posed a threat.

    Company CEO Todd Hornbeck said after the ruling that he is looking forward to getting back to work.

    "It's the right thing for not only the industry but the country," he said.

    The moratorium was declared May 6 and originally was to last only through the month. Obama announced May 27 that he was extending it for six months.

    In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal and corporate leaders said the moratorium would force drilling rigs to leave the Gulf of Mexico for lucrative business in foreign waters.

    They said the loss of business would cost the area thousands of lucrative jobs, most paying more than $50,000 a year. The state's other major economic sector, tourism, is a largely low-wage industry.

    Tim Kerner, the mayor of Lafitte, La., cheered Feldman's ruling.

    "I love it. I think it's great for the jobs here and the people who depend on them," said Kerner, whose constituents make their living, primarily, from commercial fishing or oil.

    But in its response to the lawsuit, the Interior Department said the moratorium is necessary as attempts to stop the leak and clean the Gulf continue and new safety standards are developed.

    "A second deepwater blowout could overwhelm the efforts to respond to the current disaster," the Interior Department said.

    The government also challenged contentions the moratorium would lead to long-term economic harm. Although 33 deepwater drilling sites were affected, there are still 3,600 oil and natural gas production platforms in the Gulf.

    Catherine Wannamaker, a lawyer for environmental groups that intervened in the case and supported the moratorium, called the ruling "a step in the wrong direction."

    "We think it overlooks the ongoing harm in the Gulf, the devastation it has had on people's lives," she said. "The harm at issue with the Deepwater Horizon spill is bigger than just the Louisiana economy. It affects all of the Gulf."

  • #2

    Comment


    • #3
      For Baseball Dave and Longnex

      Main Entry: mor·a·to·ri·um

      1 a : a legally authorized period of delay in the performance of a legal obligation or the payment of a debt b : a waiting period set by an authority
      2 : a suspension of activity


      This should help them to understand the thread, God bless those Cajuns inbreeders
      Questions, comments, complaints:
      [email protected]

      Comment


      • #4
        this may be the first in a long string of court losses for this administration that seems to have a habit of stepping on the constitution.
        “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."

        Gerald Ford

        Comment


        • #5
          The little Man King of the World will try and get his revenge, count on it.
          NBA is a joke

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jcindaville View Post
            Main Entry: mor·a·to·ri·um

            1 a : a legally authorized period of delay in the performance of a legal obligation or the payment of a debt b : a waiting period set by an authority
            2 : a suspension of activity


            This should help them to understand the thread, God bless those Cajuns inbreeders

            coming from someone in louisville, i'm impressed !!!
            and I know you know about "inbreeders" being from the "inbreeding capital of the US !! "

            and at least there wasn't a moratorium on inbreeding. That would mean no jobs or sex !!!
            jc Wishes He Can Get A Goat

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by husker View Post
              this may be the first in a long string of court losses for this administration that seems to have a habit of stepping on the constitution.
              wow, were you in the dark when Bush was in office regarding stepping on the constitution? Expanding presidential powers, patriot act, taking away habius corpus, illegal wire tapping. Bush and company basiclly wiped their asses with the constitution and flush it down the toilet. Yes, I'm still bringing up Bush because the things he did while he was in office is going to set our country back 2-3 generations. my great grand children will still have the right to blame bush because he screwed our country up so bad that its going to take 50 years to get it back.
              "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." -Mark Twain

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by grandmama View Post
                wow, were you in the dark when Bush was in office regarding stepping on the constitution? Expanding presidential powers, patriot act, taking away habius corpus, illegal wire tapping. Bush and company basiclly wiped their asses with the constitution and flush it down the toilet. Yes, I'm still bringing up Bush because the things he did while he was in office is going to set our country back 2-3 generations. my great grand children will still have the right to blame bush because he screwed our country up so bad that its going to take 50 years to get it back.
                not saying you are totally wrong but can you HONESTLY say that Obama isn't doing the same? You don't think what he is doing will also set our counrty back even further?
                Two wrongs don't make it right and you surely can't believe that what Obama has/is doing will make it right?
                I think your grandchildren and mine will blame Bush and Obama for what has happened and is on track to happen. I hope you are not nieve enough to believe differently. It wasn't just the Reps or Dems, it was both.
                jc Wishes He Can Get A Goat

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by grandmama View Post
                  wow, were you in the dark when Bush was in office regarding stepping on the constitution? Expanding presidential powers, patriot act, taking away habius corpus, illegal wire tapping. Bush and company basiclly wiped their asses with the constitution and flush it down the toilet. Yes, I'm still bringing up Bush because the things he did while he was in office is going to set our country back 2-3 generations. my great grand children will still have the right to blame bush because he screwed our country up so bad that its going to take 50 years to get it back.
                  and clinton started the bubbles that burst (wallstreet and housing), that our grandchildren are going to be paying for. then there is the 9/11 planing that got us into afghanistan.
                  “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."

                  Gerald Ford

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    BTW, it just came out today that the judge that wants to block the moratorium holds a lot of stock in oil companies, so this move can be viewed as one that he did so his stock portfolio will increase. Looks like another judge that's putting his own personal interest ahead of people in his region. IMO, his ruling had little to do with jobs and a lot to do with his oil buddies.
                    "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." -Mark Twain

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by grandmama View Post
                      BTW, it just came out today that the judge that wants to block the moratorium holds a lot of stock in oil companies, so this move can be viewed as one that he did so his stock portfolio will increase. Looks like another judge that's putting his own personal interest ahead of people in his region. IMO, his ruling had little to do with jobs and a lot to do with his oil buddies.

                      "a lot of stock"?????????

                      where is this coming from?

                      from the huffington post:

                      Feldman's financial disclosure report for 2008, the most recent available, shows holdings in at least eight petroleum companies or funds that invest in them, including Transocean Ltd., which owned the Deepwater Horizon. The report shows that most of his holdings were valued at less than $15,000; it did not provide specific amounts.

                      It was not clear whether Feldman still has any of the energy industry stocks. Recent court filings indicate he may no longer have Transocean stock. The 2008 report showed that he did not own any individual shares in big companies such as BP, which leased the rig that exploded, or ExxonMobil.


                      ***"It was not clear whether Feldman still has any of the energy industry stocks."***

                      GM, there for a while you were being fair, but i guess it's just too hard to not to exaggerate things to try and make a point. it's almost like you are trying to fill in for vitturd while he is banned.
                      Last edited by husker; 06-23-2010, 10:58 PM.
                      “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."

                      Gerald Ford

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        yea because youre so fair and unbiased..........talking about filling in for someone
                        Last edited by musclemann; 06-23-2010, 11:04 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          So if the judge would have ruled in Obama's favor it would have been lauded as a fair and impartial ruling.

                          This guy is being attacked because he dared to do the right thing. It is crazy for the US to stop drilling over one accident. Is the rest of the world going to stop.........NOPE.

                          Wow, the judge had some oil shares, probably in his mutual funds, most funds will have them.
                          NBA is a joke

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by flarendep1 View Post
                            So if the judge would have ruled in Obama's favor it would have been lauded as a fair and impartial ruling.

                            This guy is being attacked because he dared to do the right thing. It is crazy for the US to stop drilling over one accident. Is the rest of the world going to stop.........NOPE.

                            Wow, the judge had some oil shares, probably in his mutual funds, most funds will have them.
                            Bingo

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              :
                              Originally posted by husker View Post
                              "a lot of stock"?????????

                              where is this coming from?

                              from the huffington post:

                              Feldman's financial disclosure report for 2008, the most recent available, shows holdings in at least eight petroleum companies or funds that invest in them, including Transocean Ltd., which owned the Deepwater Horizon. The report shows that most of his holdings were valued at less than $15,000; it did not provide specific amounts.

                              It was not clear whether Feldman still has any of the energy industry stocks. Recent court filings indicate he may no longer have Transocean stock. The 2008 report showed that he did not own any individual shares in big companies such as BP, which leased the rig that exploded, or ExxonMobil.


                              ***"It was not clear whether Feldman still has any of the energy industry stocks."***

                              GM, there for a while you were being fair, but i guess it's just too hard to not to exaggerate things to try and make a point. it's almost like you are trying to fill in for vitturd while he is banned.
                              I am being fair. how can you not see through the judges bull? I have 2 cousins that work on a rig right off of the shores in Gulf Shores, down Fort Morgan Road to be exact. They've told me countless times that they are surprised this hasn't happened before. The rigs the work on hasn't been updated for over 30 years. The oil companies will try to get as much out of the rigs before the invest more money into updating them to 21st century standards. They've voiced their concerns to managment, but were bullied around, thus they are scared that if they voice their concerns then they will get fired.
                              "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." -Mark Twain

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X