Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama/Dems 51 vote nuclear option is arrogant power grab against the founder's intent

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama/Dems 51 vote nuclear option is arrogant power grab against the founder's intent

    Breitbart.tv Obama & Dems in 2005: 51 Vote ‘Nuclear Option’ Is ‘Arrogant’ Power Grab Against the Founder’s Intent
    Last edited by Spark; 02-24-2010, 05:17 PM.

  • #2
    Will there be a response w/o any of the following themes:

    Bush's fault.

    Repubs are the party of "no". (Talking point for those that forgot the majorities in the House and Senate for over a year)

    What have the Repubs offered.

    Repubs just want people to die quicker.

    What if President Obama was commander when 9/11 happened.

    Where were your posts when YOUR BOY was ruining the country.

    Where were the WMD's.

    Comment


    • #3
      Harold Bush...Can you contact me at addyys Not Allowed
      Last edited by Spark; 02-24-2010, 05:18 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by umreb78 View Post
        Harold Bush...Can you contact me at [/email]?
        uh-oh, I feel like I'm in trouble!
        Last edited by Spark; 02-24-2010, 05:18 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by harold_bush View Post
          uh-oh, I feel like I'm in trouble!


          Maybe UmReb is a teabagger??

          I actually think he is on the right team!

          JK Umreb!
          NBA is a joke

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by harold_bush View Post
            uh-oh, I feel like I'm in trouble!

            Comment


            • #7
              Sounds like the Dems were the party of No back then.
              NBA is a joke

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by umreb78 View Post
                Harold Bush...Can you contact me at [emai[/email]?
                See you next week umreb78
                Last edited by Spark; 02-24-2010, 05:18 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  harold .,,

                  Stop calling people out or I will ban you from these threads ,.,,

                  http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/ra...-everyone.html
                  Last edited by Spark; 02-24-2010, 05:52 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Considering there isn't one comment in from the libs, I think the point is more than made from this post. Obama, Reid, Biden are are self serving pieces of crap. There are no excuses, so that is why the libs can comment.

                    Oh yeah, a new CNN poll says only 25% of the people want this bill passed. 25% and these fucking idiots are talking about cramming it through. Again, the only positive is that it would be absolute political suicide if they pass this through reconciliation. It will guarantee Republicans take over both the house and senate.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      people overwhelmingly made this decision in 2008. When the current president ran on health care reform. I know its a bitter pill swallow but 3 states dont count for an entire nation.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        People being for "health care reform" and people being for this particular scam bill are two different things imo.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by musclemann View Post
                          people overwhelmingly made this decision in 2008. When the current president ran on health care reform. I know its a bitter pill swallow but 3 states dont count for an entire nation.
                          The Chosen One ran on a lot of promises, most of which he has gone back on. As JM mentioned, healthcare reform and this disaster bill are two totally different things. Almost everybody wants some type of reform (competition, tort reform) so the result of the election meant nothing as far as this bill.

                          I'm very curious (I don't want to get in trouble so I'm not calling you out) to get your take on the point of this post, that they are now talking about doing something that Obama, Reid, Biden, Hilary, etc were absolutely against in the past, something that said should never be done. Any issues w/ that?
                          Last edited by harold_bush; 02-25-2010, 12:44 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            IMO, I'm just sick and tired of both sides not getting anything done. I don't think either party really wants to pass HCare. They both get too much money from big pharma and insurance. Both parties have become two wings of corporate america.
                            "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." -Mark Twain

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by harold_bush View Post
                              The Chosen One ran on a lot of promises, most of which he has gone back on. As JM mentioned, healthcare reform and this disaster bill are two totally different things. Almost everybody wants some type of reform (competition, tort reform) so the result of the election meant nothing as far as this bill.

                              I'm very curious (I don't want to get in trouble so I'm not calling you out) to get your take on the point of this post, that they are now talking about doing something that Obama, Reid, Biden, Hilary, etc were absolutely against in the past, something that said should never be done. Any issues w/ that?
                              Always on the talking points, Harold. but you're independent...LOL.... I wish one of your children were raped by this pediatrician in Delaware, but you could only sue him for $100,000 or $25,000 or some bullshit like that because of tort reform.... So you people think that Toyota shouldn't be liable or should only be liable up to $50,000 for every person they murdered with this accelerator problem... Companies will start doing costs analysis to decide if they would get out cheaper by paying victims off or producing a safe product. That's why you have punitive damages....You people never actually think about issues and how they affect real people everyday and probably yourself at one time or another...

                              PS: My father was a doctor and was very much in favor of some sort of nationalized health-care.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X