Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Biden’s lobbying ties

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Biden’s lobbying ties

    Biden’s lobbying ties

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Biden’s lobbying ties

    posted at 9:30 am on August 23, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
    Send to a Friend | printer-friendly

    How thoroughly did Barack Obama vet Joe Biden? After months of demonizing lobbyists, Obama selected a running mate who has taken millions in contributions from those same lobbyists Obama supposedly eschewed, at least until the DNC started running out of money. In fact, Biden’s son works as a lobbyist on Capitol Hill, accruing the kind of earmarks that Obama has both decried and pursued:
    Biden has accepted $5,133,072 in contributions from lawyers and lobbyists since 2003. Obama does not accept contributions from federally registered lobbyists.
    And he has one other weakness that hasn’t received much attention to date. One of Biden’s sons, Hunter, is a registered Washington lobbyist in a year in which Obama has been excoriating lobbyists and the culture of corruption in Washington. The younger Biden is a name partner at the firm Oldaker, Biden & Belair, LLP, and seems to have specialized in lobbying for just the kind of earmark spending by Congress that Obama has vowed to slash. Republican insiders say the party is likely to make an issue of Biden’s family lobbying ties.
    Also expect to hear more about Biden’s close ties with credit card companies. His largest contributor (based on total contributions by employees) over the past five years has been MBNA, the Delaware-based bank aquired in 2005 by Bank of America than until then was the world’s largest independent credit card issuer and a major supporter of the 2005 bankruptcy bill that Biden crossed the aisle to support.

    Once again, I want to point out that lobbying is a Constitutionally protected exercise. The First Amendment gives Americans the right to petition Congress, and nothing prohibits or even discourages citizens from organizing in that effort to harness the power of numbers. Run ethically, the practice of lobbying fills an important role in politics.
    Of course, I’m not the one declaring lobbyists persona non grata in the Democratic Party. That was Barack Obama, who declared just two months ago that lobbyists would not fund “my party”:


    The Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard: We will not take a dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. … They will not fund my party!
    Take a look at the top five industries that donate to Biden as well:
    Lawyers/law firms
    Real estate
    Retired
    Securities & investment
    Miscellaneous finance
    Real estate and miscellaneous finance — wouldn’t that figure into the credit crisis and the housing market collapse?
    It looks like Obama didn’t just throw Hope and Change under the bus, but himself right along with it. Whether this is hypocrisy or incompetence, it’s stunning either way.
    "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
    -- Sir Winston Churchill

    When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.
    --Benjamin Franklin

  • #2
    I couldn't agree more and I too have posted a recent Blog post very similar to this one.

    If you are interested please take a look at our DoFollow Tulsa Real Estate blog at this location<

    We welcome posts that truly do contribute to our content.

    Americans must continue to rise to help offset the 30% that are still drinking the Kool-Aid

    Comment


    • #3
      By all means rise up, but why weren't you rising up a few years ago? That's when we needed you.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Tulsa Homes View Post
        I couldn't agree more and I too have posted a recent Blog post very similar to this one.

        If you are interested please take a look at our DoFollow Tulsa Real Estate blog at this location<

        We welcome posts that truly do contribute to our content.

        Americans must continue to rise to help offset the 30% that are still drinking the Kool-Aid



        WOW, WELCOME

        Where were you when we were paying 475 for a gallon of gas tulsa?

        I GUESS SIPPING THE KOOLAID

        Comment


        • #5
          Does this guy sell Real Estate in Tulsa?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by musclemann View Post
            WOW, WELCOME

            Where were you when we were paying 475 for a gallon of gas tulsa?

            I GUESS SIPPING THE KOOLAID
            Who controlled Congress when these insane deficits have soared? Who is making a bad situation worse?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jamaicanman View Post
              Who controlled Congress when these insane deficits have soared? Who is making a bad situation worse?
              everyone seems to conveniently forget or isn't smart enough to realize that CONGRESS controls ALL the spending, not the president. the president has veto power, but that is it. the only time you can really blame a president is when his party controls the congress also, the bigger the majority the more blame because not everyone votes party lines. bush 4 years, clinton's first two, and carters carter's 4 years. looking back, even when rep's had control, it was a very small majority compared to the MUCH bigger majority dem's have had for most of the last 50 years. it was interesting to look at.
              “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."

              Gerald Ford

              Comment


              • #8
                This "battle" with Wall Street is SO transparent. The administration ALWAYS needs a bad guy to point fingers at to deflect their own responsibility in the mess.

                What were the deficit numbers under President Bush the first 6 years, and what were they when a Dem Congress came in? I know the "party line" answer is "President Bush had a surplus", but facts are facts. Granted, President Bush could have vetoed those over spending budgets, so he is also responsible. But Dems seem to hold their own party blameless.

                And if Presidnet Bush turned a surplus into a deficit, what have the Dems done since 2006 to right that wrong? The answer is nothing but increase the spending. Selective memories I guess.

                Comment

                Working...
                X