Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

N.J to end it's death penalty

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • N.J to end it's death penalty

    Friday, December 14, 2007
    TRENTON, N.J. - With New Jersey poised to become the first state in four decades to abolish the death penalty, opponents of the practice declared a historic victory and hoped other states would follow suit.

    The Assembly voted 44-36 on Thursday to approve the legislation, which passed the Senate on Monday by a 21-16 vote. Gov. Jon S. Corzine said he will sign it within a week.

    Supporters hoped New Jersey's move would start a wave of similar legislation. Thirty-seven states have the death penalty, according to the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center.

    "New Jersey stands to embolden lawmakers who were as fearful of eliminating capital punishment as they were of keeping it," said Larry Cox, executive director of Amnesty International USA. "This is a harbinger of things to come."

    Bills to abolish the death penalty were recently approved by a Colorado House committee, the Montana Senate and the New Mexico House. But none have advanced further.

    The nation's most recent execution was Sept. 25 in Texas. Since then, executions have been delayed pending a U.S. Supreme Court decision on whether execution by lethal injection violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

    New Jersey reinstated the death penalty in 1982, six years after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to resume executions, but nobody has been executed in the Garden State since 1963.

    New Jersey has been barred from executing anyone under a 2004 court ruling that declared invalid the state's lethal injection procedures.

    A special state commission found in January that the death penalty was a more expensive sentence than life in prison, hasn't deterred murder, and could kill innocent people.

    The measure would spare eight men on the state's death row, including Jesse Timmendequas, a sex offender who murdered 7-year-old Megan Kanka in 1994.

    The case inspired Megan's Law, which requires law enforcement agencies to notify the public about convicted sex offenders living in their communities.

    "There is no doubt whatsoever that those criminals now sitting on death row are guilty," said Assemblyman Richard Merkt, a Republican. "Yet their lives are being spared in the name of justice. Tell me then, where is the justice for Megan Kanka and her family?"

    Corzine said life in prison without parole offers a more certain outcome than death penalty sentences that come with years of appeals.

    "This is an issue of conscience and the responsible administration of justice," he said.

    The bill gives the state's death row inmates 60 days to decide whether to waive appeals and be sentenced to life in prison without parole. If such a motion isn't made, the inmates would remain under the death sentence but would likely never be executed.

  • #2
    Never been to NJ and never will now.Now they can all pay the taxes it takes to keep these scums alive for 50 years.
    Last edited by vols fan; 12-14-2007, 07:40 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      What a bunch of fucking bullshit

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks to all you liberalS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
        jordanrules..................

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jordanrules23
          Thanks to all you liberalS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          The hypocracy of your party......
          1. PRO LIFE
          2. PRO DEATH PENALTY
          3. ANTI WELFARE
          4. PRO GUN
          5. CHRISTIAN......................................

          Comment


          • #6
            since they ended the death penalty,maybe they can release that sex offender who killed that 7 year old girl so I can take care of his ass for them.Our laws have gone to shit.I can tell you one thing these guys who are getting put in jail for killing someone who tried to bring harm to there family,deserve to be a hero not incarcerated.

            Comment


            • #7
              Life of David Gale.......

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Celtics86
                Life of David Gale.......
                Isn't that a movie.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Celtics86
                  The hypocracy of your party......
                  1. PRO LIFE
                  2. PRO DEATH PENALTY
                  3. ANTI WELFARE
                  4. PRO GUN
                  5. CHRISTIAN......................................

                  Christian? That's a joke. Republicans use the Christian community to get their votes then laugh behind their backs.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Celtics86
                    The hypocracy of your party......
                    1. PRO LIFE
                    2. PRO DEATH PENALTY
                    3. ANTI WELFARE
                    4. PRO GUN
                    5. CHRISTIAN......................................


                    OK - lets look at the first two. Democrats and Liberals would rather kill innocent pre-borns and keep alive guilty murderors

                    #3 Republicans are not anti-welfare, they have not cut spending nearly enough and wasn't it Clinton who "reformed welfare".

                    #4 Pro-Gun - Yes, like it or not boys, we have the right to bear arms. More gun laws not not stop lawbreakers
                    I own a gun and if any bastard breaks into my house and threatens my family he will have it coming to him.

                    #5 Christian - Yeah the country was founded on Judeo/Christian values, anything wrong with that? Should we bow out to the Muslims?
                    NBA is a joke

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Good points.Who you like so far.I'm leaning towards Huckabee.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by BettorsChat
                        Christian? That's a joke. Republicans use the Christian community to get their votes then laugh behind their backs.
                        You couldn't be more right BC. I'm telling you BC, you are a Kucinich supporter and you don't even know it.

                        Here is my take on the Death penalty. If there is a confession from a killer that he or she did the Killing and there is DNA evidence to back up that confession. That killer should be put to death about one month after the trial. If these two things are not present than you can not put that person to death.

                        It's people like the TBK killer that should not be aloud to live. People who confess to killings or there is no doubt that they did it should not be aloud to live.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by BettorsChat
                          Christian? That's a joke. Republicans use the Christian community to get their votes then laugh behind their backs.
                          you cant be serious??????????????
                          jordanrules..................

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by flarendep1
                            OK - lets look at the first two. Democrats and Liberals would rather kill innocent pre-borns and keep alive guilty murderors

                            #3 Republicans are not anti-welfare, they have not cut spending nearly enough and wasn't it Clinton who "reformed welfare".

                            #4 Pro-Gun - Yes, like it or not boys, we have the right to bear arms. More gun laws not not stop lawbreakers
                            I own a gun and if any bastard breaks into my house and threatens my family he will have it coming to him.

                            #5 Christian - Yeah the country was founded on Judeo/Christian values, anything wrong with that? Should we bow out to the Muslims?
                            You need to read Roe vs. Wade

                            Have the right to bear arms I agree, but certain weapons shouldn't be sold. AKA Military type etc.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by jordanrules23
                              you cant be serious??????????????
                              Uh, I'm afraid so

                              Obvisouly you missed out on that whole subject when it was all over the media. Then again you don't even know who President Jimmy Carter was or is.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X