Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush Vetoes Bill on Stem Cell Research

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bush Vetoes Bill on Stem Cell Research

    Clinton Blasts Move as 'Ideology Before Science'
    By DEB RIECHMANN
    AP
    Posted: 2007-06-20 13:54:49
    WASHINGTON (June 20) - Pushing back against the Democratic-led Congress , President Bush vetoed a bill Wednesday that would have eased restraints on federally funded embryonic stem cell research.

    Democrats, who had made the stem cell legislation a top priority when they took control of the House and Senate in January, were quick to denounce the president's decision.

    "This is just one example of how the president puts ideology before science, politics before the needs of our families, just one more example of how out of touch with reality he and his party have become," Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton , D-N.Y., told the Take Back America conference of liberal activists Wednesday.

    To blunt criticism, the White House said Bush is issuing an executive order directing the Health and Human Services Department to promote research into cells that -- like human embryonic stem cells -- also hold the potential of regenerating into different types of cells that might be used to battle disease.

    "This is, certainly not an attempt to muzzle science," White House press secretary Tony Snow said. "It is an attempt, I think, to respect people's conscience on such an issue."

    If the measure Bush vetoed would have become law, the White House said it would have compelled taxpayers for the first time in our history -- to support the deliberate destruction of human embyros. Snow said Bush's executive order will encourage scientists to work with the government to add research on new stem cell lines -- that does not involve the creation, harming or destruction of human embryos -- to the list of projects eligible for federal funding.

    "The president does not believe it's appropriate to put an end to human life for research purposes," Snow said. "That's a line he will not cross."

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is expected to schedule an override vote, but the date has not been set. Democrats, however, currently do not have enough votes to override Bush's veto.

    Scientists were first able to conduct research with embryonic stem cells in 1998, the NIH says. There were no federal funds for the work until Bush announced on Aug. 9, 2001, that his administration would make the funds available for lines of cells that already were in existence.

    Currently, states and private organizations are permitted to fund embryonic stem cell research, but federal support is limited to cells that existed as of Aug. 9, 2001. The latest bill was aimed at lifting that restriction.


    The science aside, the issue has weighty political and ethical implications.

    Public opinion polls show strong support for the research, and it could return as an issue in the 2008 elections.

    Opponents of the latest stem cell measure insisted that the use of embryonic stem cells was the wrong approach on moral grounds -- and possibly not even the most promising one scientifically. These opponents, who applaud Bush's veto, cite breakthroughs involving medical research conducted with adult stem cells, umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid, none of which involve the destruction of a human embryo.

    This was the third veto of Bush's presidency. His first occurred last year when he rejected legislation to allow funding of additional lines of embryonic stem cells -- a measure that passed over the objections of Republicans then in control. The second legislation he vetoed would have set timetables for U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq .

  • #2
    This is one thing I side with the Dems on. I'm all for stem cell research.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by kbsooner21
      This is one thing I side with the Dems on. I'm all for stem cell research.
      WOW where's meg at she would get a kick out of this

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by BettorsChat
        WOW where's meg at she would get a kick out of this
        I just think there are so many positive things that could come from it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by kbsooner21
          I just think there are so many positive things that could come from it.
          There's a ton of positives that can come from it. That's why it should be a high priority for the gov't as well as citizens. Especially citizens that could benefit from the research.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BettorsChat
            There's a ton of positives that can come from it. That's why it should be a high priority for the gov't as well as citizens. Especially citizens that could benefit from the research.
            My grandmother died from Huntington's Disease and my mom now has it. 50/50 chance that I have it. I also have an uncle that has Parkinson's. I think stem cell research could go a long way in finding cure's for these diseases as well as other ones.

            Comment


            • #7
              i agree with you kb.
              2013 NCAA POD Record

              8-3ATS +3.80 units

              2013 NFL POD Record

              1-2 ATS -4.50 units

              Comment


              • #8
                WOW....I might actually think you two homo's are intelligent afterall...

                KAZ
                [email protected]

                I'm just here so I won't get fined....

                Comment

                Working...
                X