Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Democrat TAX PLAN explained

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Democrat TAX PLAN explained

    Democrat TAX PLAN explained
    If you don't understand the Democrats' version of tax refunds, maybe this will help explain it :

    50,000 people go to a baseball game, but the game was rained out. A refund was then due. The team was about to mail refunds when a group of Congressional Democrats stopped them and suggested that they send out the ticket refunds based on the Democrat National Committee's
    interpretation of fairness. Originally the refunds were to be paid based on the price each person had paid for the tickets. Unfortunately that meant most of the refund money would be going to the ticket holders that had purchased the most expensive tickets. This, according to the DNC, is considered totally unfair. A decision was then made to pay out the refunds in this manner:

    People in the $10 seats will get back $15. After all, they have less money to spend on tickets to begin with. Call it an "Earned Income Ticket Credit." Persons "earn" it by
    having few skills, poor work habits, and low ambition, thus keeping them at entry-level wages.

    People in the $25 seats will get back $25,because it "seems fair."

    People in the $50 seats will get back $1, because they already make a lot of money and don't need a refund. After all, if they can afford a $50 ticket, they must not be paying
    enough taxes.

    People in the $75 luxury box seats will each have to pay
    an additional $25 because it's the "right thing to do."

    People walking past the stadium that couldn't afford to buy a ticket for the game each will get a $10 refund, even though they didn't pay anything for the tickets. They need the most help.

    Now do you understand? If not, contact Representative Nancy Pelosi, Senator Ted Kennedy, Senator Hillary
    Clinton or BC for assistance.

  • #2
    LMAO the sad thing is this is true
    2013 NCAA POD Record

    8-3ATS +3.80 units

    2013 NFL POD Record

    1-2 ATS -4.50 units

    Comment


    • #3
      Too bad we were in a surplus with Bill Clinton then in 2 years Panzy ass Bush whiped that out and added 300 billion to our deficet.

      BURP

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by BettorsChat
        Too bad we were in a surplus with Bill Clinton then in 2 years Panzy ass Bush whiped that out and added 300 billion to our deficet.

        BURP
        Could we have been in a surplus b/c of the extra tax revenues generated from capital gains taxes b/c portfolios were overflowing with cash from companies manipulating their stock prices under your hero?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by gbell
          Could we have been in a surplus b/c of the extra tax revenues generated from capital gains taxes b/c portfolios were overflowing with cash from companies manipulating their stock prices under your hero?
          LMFAO ever hear of Enron? Who was that under?

          Why has haliburton stock beeen going up? Why are they getting Gov't contracts with no competition?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BettorsChat
            Why has haliburton stock beeen going up? Why are they getting Gov't contracts with no competition?
            Who else can compete with Haliburton? Kind of like a microsoft deal in my opinion.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by BettorsChat
              LMFAO ever hear of Enron? Who was that under?

              Why has haliburton stock beeen going up? Why are they getting Gov't contracts with no competition?
              So no fraud under your hero's watch? Ever hear of a tech bubble? Was the US attacked (in the 48) under billy boob? Dogs to apples comparison.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by gbell
                So no fraud under your hero's watch? Ever hear of a tech bubble? Was the US attacked (in the 48) under billy boob? Dogs to apples comparison.
                No fraud under Bush? Bush Sr? Or any republican? LMFAO.

                Pumping the tech stocks wasn't Clinton it was that former asshole that was at Merryl Lynch that got sued.

                Talk about something you might actually know about.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BettorsChat
                  No fraud under Bush? Bush Sr? Or any republican? LMFAO.

                  Pumping the tech stocks wasn't Clinton it was that former asshole that was at Merryl Lynch that got sued.

                  Talk about something you might actually know about.
                  Where did I say there is no fraud under Bush?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by gbell
                    Where did I say there is no fraud under Bush?
                    Where did I say there was no fraud under clinton?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      right wing bull ... i cannot wait till they convict bush's under boss (a.k.a mr. hallibutan) for lying and then if time permites its g-w2 ' turn (weapons of mass destruction) what bull shit i hope theres still room for his wormie ass at guantanamo bay

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Or George Bush can lie to all in attendance and say he needs the money to go find nukes in IRAQ.......at which point rich and poor alike get fucked while the poor also have to send their kids to go die.

                        Im sure if given both options most would gladly give 20 bucks and not 10 to those hovering the side walks

                        PEACE

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Did I mention he keeps coming back and asking for more and more money and more and more troops to go get slaughtered half way around the earth? Lemme know when we find the NUKES

                          PEACE

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X