Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scraping By: Minimum Wage Across America

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Scraping By: Minimum Wage Across America

    Candace Corner, CareerBuilder.com writer
    With the costs for gas, energy and seemingly everything else at an uncomfortable high, the only national figures that don't seem to be getting any fatter are the ones on the paychecks.

    The minimum wage has been stuck at $5.15 an hour for over nine years, making it the second-longest freeze in wage growth since the establishment of the U.S. minimum wage in 1938. The cost of living has risen 26 percent, but the minimum rate of compensation hasn't seen a value this low since 1955, and Senate recently rejected a proposal that would have raised the rate to $7.25 by 2008.

    So who's making the minimum? According to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), 11 percent of the workforce, an estimated 14.9 million workers, would receive a boost in their hourly compensation if the rate hike proposal had passed. About 6.6 million workers earning less than $7.25 would have been directly affected by the increase. But the pay increase isn't limited to those earning exactly $5.15 an hour. More than 8 million workers earning a bit more than the minimum rate would see an increase as employers made adjustments to keep the payroll in check.

    As political parties continue to battle out wage laws at the federal level, more than 20 states and the District of Columbia have raised rates through ballot initiatives and legislative actions to meet the needs of their residential workers. As of August 2006, the EPI reports that more than half of the U.S. population currently lives in states that have, or are about to have, passed laws raising minimum wages higher than the federal rate of $5.15.

    The 2005 Current Population Survey, compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, reported West Virginia and Oklahoma as having the highest number of workers earning hourly wages at or below $5.15. In contrast, the states of California, Alaska and Washington reported the lowest population of residents earning minimum wage or less.

    According to combined data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, individual state labeor departments and the EPI, here are the most current findings for minimum wages rates as of August 2006:

    Alabama: No state minimum wage law.

    Alaska: $7.15. Rate automatically adjusts to remain at least $1.00 above the federal minimum wage in the event of a federal change.

    Arizona: No state minimum wage law.

    Arkansas: $5.15. Increasing to $6.25 as of Oct. 1, 2006.

    California: $6.75. Increasing to $7.50 as of Jan. 1, 2007, and $8.00 as of Jan. 1, 2008. Beyond that, the minimum wage will be evaluated yearly. The rate is $8.82 in San Francisco. Companies that do business with the City of Los Angeles must pay workers at least $9.08 per hour with health benefits, or $10.33 without.

    Colorado: $5.15.

    Connecticut: $7.40. Increasing to $7.65 as of Jan. 1, 2007.

    Delaware: $6.15. Increasing to $6.65 in 2007, and $7.15 in 2008.

    District of Columbia: $7.00.

    Florida: $6.40 (adjusting annually with inflation).

    Georgia: $5.15.

    Hawaii: $6.75. Increasing to $7.25 as of Jan. 1, 2007.

    Idaho: $5.15.

    Illinois: $6.50. $6.00 for employees under the age of 18.

    Indiana: $5.15.

    Iowa: $5.15.

    Kansas: $2.65. Applies only when the federal Fair Labor Standards Act does not.

    Kentucky: $5.15.

    Louisiana: No state minimum wage law.

    Maine: $6.50. Increasing to $6.75 as of Oct. 2006, and $7.00 as of Oct., 2007.

    Maryland: $6.15.

    Massachusetts: $6.75. Increasing to $7.50 as of Jan. 1, 2007, and $8.00 as of Jan. 1, 2008.

    Michigan: $5.15. Increasing to $6.95 as of Oct. 1, 2006, $7.15 as of July 1, 2007 and to $7.40 as of July 1, 2008.

    Minnesota: $6.15.

    Mississippi: No state minimum wage law.

    Missouri: $5.15.

    Montana: $5.15.

    Nebraska: $5.15.

    Nevada: $5.15. A 2004 amendment, proposing an increase minimum wage to $6.15 starting in 2007, and adjusted yearly, requires re-approval in 2006 to become law.

    New Hampshire: $5.15.

    New Jersey: $6.15. Increases to $7.15 as of Oct. 2006.

    New Mexico: $5.15. $9.50 in Santa Fe, as of 2006.

    New York: $6.75. Increasing to $7.15 as of Jan. 1, 2007.

    North Carolina: $5.15. Increasing to $6.15 as of Jan. 1, 2007.

    North Dakota: $5.15.

    Ohio: $5.15.

    Oklahoma: $5.15, and $2.00 for work not covered by the federal minimum wage.

    Oregon: $7.50 (adjusting annually with inflation).

    Pennsylvania: $5.15. Increasing to $6.25 as of Jan. 1, 2007, and to $7.15 as of July 1, 2007. For companies with 10 or fewer employees: $5.65 as of Jan. 1, 2007; $6.65 as of July 1, 2007; and $7.15 as of July 1, 2008.

    Rhode Island: $7.10. Increasing to $7.40 as of 2007.

    South Carolina: $5.15.

    South Dakota: $5.15.

    Tennessee: No state minimum wage law.

    Texas: $5.15.

    Utah: $5.15.

    Vermont: $7.25 (adjusted annually with inflation).

    Virginia: $5.15.

    Washington: $7.63 (adjusted annually with inflation).

    West Virginia: $5.15.

    Wisconsin: $6.50.

    Wyoming: $5.15.

    Candace Corner is a writer for CareerBuilder.com.

  • #2
    There should be a federally mandated minimum of maybe $7.75 and a adjusted scale for cost of living per state....

    i.e. the min wage in CT should be much higher than say alabama due to the cost of living and prevailing higher wages there....For instance in Fairfield County they could not get people to work at McDonalds for minimum....They would fill those positions for $10 and hour and bus the people in from Bridgeport.....

    Eventually the capital market will set the wage....If there is a comp. environment it will be forced higher....but seeing $5.15 is disgusting in some states......I did not think it was that low....

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree that some States especially upper East Coast, West Coast and even Northern States will have to have different rates since the cost of living is higher than other areas.

      What is good though is that many States are taking the matter into their own hands.

      Comment


      • #4
        The market sets the prevailing wage. TTT proved it when he said Macdonalds had to bus in people for $10.00/hr. The minimum is there for entry level jobs, i.e. teens and first time workers. Why is $7.75 the magic number? Why not make it $15-20.00/hr or more? The market sets the rate, not the goverment.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mooshroma
          The market sets the prevailing wage. TTT proved it when he said Macdonalds had to bus in people for $10.00/hr. The minimum is there for entry level jobs, i.e. teens and first time workers. Why is $7.75 the magic number? Why not make it $15-20.00/hr or more? The market sets the rate, not the goverment.

          you would think that were the case.....but if the market swings the other way (recession) people still need to make a minimum....This is for the people who need protection imho....I owned a business where i employed 26 people and used to have a different outlook, but i think something has to be done...When someone can live off the gov't and make as much as min wage...there is not incentive to get off the system....this way it accomplishes maybe more than 1 thing...

          Ultimately the market will create where the wages are set...but there has to be a fair starting point

          Comment


          • #6
            So you could raise a family on $7.75/hr? I don't think so. This was not meant as a bread winner wage. The goverment should not make it easy for someone to collect unemployment. Even that is not a fair wage. When I couldn't get any interest in a clerk job at $8.00/hr, I had to go to $12.00 to get a person to interview. This is how it works and the goverment is holding the wage down with their asssistance. Let the market determine what's fair.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mooshroma
              So you could raise a family on $7.75/hr? I don't think so. This was not meant as a bread winner wage. The goverment should not make it easy for someone to collect unemployment. Even that is not a fair wage. When I couldn't get any interest in a clerk job at $8.00/hr, I had to go to $12.00 to get a person to interview. This is how it works and the goverment is holding the wage down with their asssistance. Let the market determine what's fair.

              I agree, but some people have to start somewhere.....These jobs should not be looked down upon, but a stepping stone to something better.....

              Why would you be opposed to a minimum since it seems the pressure of the mkt is pushing it upward anyways....Maybe that is no longer a min. wage job....

              I had trophy assemblers when i opened my plant in 1989 making $3.15 an hour and when i sold i some employees were making $15 an hour...and most made $10 an hour.....

              Even though min wage was $5 i think at the time...i paid more to get better people and to get people to stay.....

              But there are inner city jobs that people take who take the bus to work and i think these jobs (which are not breadwinner type jobs) will provide them a 1st step to moving up the ladder.....

              Comment


              • #8
                What would you do when there is no interest at $7.75? You'd have to find the right wage for the job. I had a 15 year old in here for a sweeping and cleaning job, 10 hours per week. The minimum is $5.15 fedderally which i thought was the minimum in NY. I put him down for $5.75/hr. My payroll company changed it to $6.75/ hr, informing me that is the NY minimum. I cut back his hours because the job he did did not require the wage NY had established. If the minimum was $7.75, I would not even had considered him for the job. That's the way in works today.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by mooshroma
                  What would you do when there is no interest at $7.75? You'd have to find the right wage for the job. I had a 15 year old in here for a sweeping and cleaning job, 10 hours per week. The minimum is $5.15 fedderally which i thought was the minimum in NY. I put him down for $5.75/hr. My payroll company changed it to $6.75/ hr, informing me that is the NY minimum. I cut back his hours because the job he did did not require the wage NY had established. If the minimum was $7.75, I would not even had considered him for the job. That's the way in works today.

                  there is no perfect solution....You do what you have to do...i had 26 employees before i sold my biz so i know what you are up against...It was in southern CT where the wages were high also

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mooshroma
                    So you could raise a family on $7.75/hr? I don't think so. This was not meant as a bread winner wage. The goverment should not make it easy for someone to collect unemployment. Even that is not a fair wage. When I couldn't get any interest in a clerk job at $8.00/hr, I had to go to $12.00 to get a person to interview. This is how it works and the goverment is holding the wage down with their asssistance. Let the market determine what's fair.
                    Exactly!
                    O..H.........I..O!

                    2010 NCAA Football: 4-3-1

                    2010 NFL: 0-0

                    2009-2010 NCAA Basketball: 30-23-1

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It is all relativeto some extent. Do you realize how big of an increase $7.75 over $5.15 is? That is approximately a 50% wage increase. That is insane. It would not only put some companies out of business, creating less jobs, it would also increase prices across the board. To make the same profits prices will just go up, and that $7.75 won't have nearly the same buying power as you think it would. So then what? Increase minimum wage anohter 50% to $11.50?

                      As mentioned, these are entry level jobs mostly for teenagers or workers with no skills. It gives them a chance to acquire skills. If someone stay in a minimum wage job that is on them most of the time.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by harold_bush
                        It is all relativeto some extent. Do you realize how big of an increase $7.75 over $5.15 is? That is approximately a 50% wage increase. That is insane. It would not only put some companies out of business, creating less jobs, it would also increase prices across the board. To make the same profits prices will just go up, and that $7.75 won't have nearly the same buying power as you think it would. So then what? Increase minimum wage anohter 50% to $11.50?

                        As mentioned, these are entry level jobs mostly for teenagers or workers with no skills. It gives them a chance to acquire skills. If someone stay in a minimum wage job that is on them most of the time.

                        well think of it this way.....they have been underpaid for sooo long that there should be extra profits for them......The %s are misleading due to such a low number....I mean if the dolphins increase their wins from 1 to 2 it is 100%......I owned a factory and i employed 26 people and a 2 dollar an hour wage hike would not put me put of business...You must cut other places or hopefully the new wage will make and retain a happier more productive worker.....I always paid over minimum and we would find our profits elsewhere.....Reduce phone bills, electricity, rent, increase production, rasie prices...There are any number of ways to do it......

                        If it is a min wage position many times it is a service job and that position is required to put out x amount of units per hour.....I just upped our output per employee as well.....

                        Limited thinking gets limited results....Abundant thinking = prosperity....

                        If it is passed we will survive and if it is not we will also

                        It will not mean that much to the consumer.....We already get everything passed down to us....Insurance premiums, etc...

                        with the tax cuts you will be able to spend more anyways
                        Last edited by TwoTonTony; 10-25-2006, 01:25 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It's simple, raise the minimum wage and prices will go up on everything. Simple economics.
                          The 1927 Yankees weren't the best team ever. What everyone fails to realize is that the year before, with the exact same team, they lost to the Cardinals in the World Series.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Southern Dandy
                            It's simple, raise the minimum wage and prices will go up on everything. Simple economics.

                            not necessarily true....There are cost of living increases everyday in business for much larger positions of 3-6%...That is a much bigger jump than this....It is up to the company to be more efficient....All of a sudden everyone is an economist

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              They are economists if they have a masters in it
                              The 1927 Yankees weren't the best team ever. What everyone fails to realize is that the year before, with the exact same team, they lost to the Cardinals in the World Series.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X