If you play the fades Please Read

[TRUCKIN]

over the last couple weeks i have been experimenting with different criteria of numbers with the fades.
i have come to the conclusion that due to the number of free plays being used and the amount of fades that are occurring that the numbers to make a play a fade need to be raised from the 15/7 criteria

i will start with bases
from now on the new criteria for me to make a baseball fade will be at least 20 services together and at least a 10 differential
the reason for this is we are losing day in and day out with numbers like 13-4, 16-3, 13-2, ect, ect
when the numbers are 20-4, 22-6, ect, ect we hit a very high percentage
another reason for this change is if i dont get a baseball report that day there will be no plays because i know for a fact i will not have anything to meet that criteria
if we are not getting a report then we shoudnt be doing the fades IMO

note: if this number needs to be raised to 25 then i will do that

baseball totals:
i have been experimenting with this alot longer and have decided to make a criteria for total plays

due to the less amount of plays on totals
the criteria for a total to be a play will be a 7 differential
starting with 7-0, 8-1, 9-2, ect
i have tracked these and they win more than they lose

for the nba even though we are on the tail end
we are making a large scale change
we have been losing our ass but i have noticed the numbers when we win
when we win the numbers are 31-9, 28-6, ect
the new criteria for the nba is 30 total services and 15 differetial
also w/o a report you cant get these numbers and if you dont get a report then there shouldnt be a fade
if we had been using these numbers for the last 2 months that would of cut out a lot of losers and some winners but more losers for sure

i am only posting this to let you guys know what to expect from me. i know alot of you play your % 's ect
you continue to do what you want and feel comfortable with krunch can decide for himself if he wants to follow this or continue what he is doing now
i have no problem at all with any of it
i am trying to tweek this system so when these big ass fades come in we start taking full advantage of them

i feel right now with as many plays that we have
we are just not where we need to be

thanks
truckin
spark could you please sticky this in the fade forum

1 other thing
i do not recieve a report everyday
i recieve it from a member here at bc that is kind enough to take the time when he is home to forward them to me
thank you
in the future if we get enough people to put in for a report or 2 that would be the key to our success
so let me know what you guys think about getting a baseball report everyday

[goldencontender]

thanx for all the hard work i can imagine how time consuming this must be. i agree with your thoughts though. i wish there were a way to go back and check fotball service threads from last year,and see how it would have worked fading in pro and nfl. brian mac on his consensus line on sundays used to give the hilton fade play, however it was only around 50-50, for the year. bol gc-

[TRUCKIN]

thanx for all the hard work i can imagine how time consuming this must be. i agree with your thoughts though. i wish there were a way to go back and check fotball service threads from last year,and see how it would have worked fading in pro and nfl. brian mac on his consensus line on sundays used to give the hilton fade play, however it was only around 50-50, for the year. bol gc-

ripple said that he did the fades at the tail end of the football season last year with another guy and he said they were very strong
the numbers that i stated above for criteria i think for football and ncaa hoops we have to start with a number we think is right and then adjust like we are doing now
i also think that we have to get a a number for the ncaa tourney and nit different from reg season
i think as the number of amount of games goes down the criteria number needs to go up

thanks for all you input, hard work & sharing
i play alot of your systems and have a number of them in my nfl book

truckin

[goldencontender]

truck, iwas also thinking maybe theres a way of making a super fade list using only the fades from the real scammer services,you know the sturgeons ,,feist, and jonny demarcos of the world. and not including some of the better services. for example i would hate to fade a game when someone like joe gavazzi of ppp has a 6 unit play on the game. basically what im saying is to exclude the cappers who have a good record whn monitored for the last 3 or 4 years. im sure we can get a good list of scamdicappers to fade though. thanx for your kind words regarding the system plays. bol gc-

[MB17]

Golden, as a guy that has had services up until I found this site, I feel very confident in saying that fades are football are going to win us TRUCKLOADS of cash. I was too dumb to think about it then, but when a lot of services were on a certain team, I'd be willing to bet that at least 65% of the time, that team lost. I used to always think to myself, that if all of these guys are on the play, then they must know something that I don't. More often than not, I'd be left pissed at the end of the day, hoping that my other plays could balance out the losses of the plays that I loaded up on because so many services were on that particular side. For me, football CANNOT get here soon enough. The fades are going to be a MAJOR success (no pun intended).

[Spearit]

Truckin and Fade Gurus- To further comments made. What if we had a list of honorable services that show no hint of giving into the dark side. One was mentioned and others should be allowed on board. These cappers will have down moments as we all do, however, what a joy it would be to keep close a few that seem legit. Maybe B/C would allow us to give credit where credit is due. This would be based on our findings and not the services saying so. One site has a Capping Police- pretty cool but you don't really know if that is legit. Thanks for the great work.

[moondog22]

Good luck on refining the fades guys

[TRUCKIN]

making a change and adding a criteria for nba totals

the nba sides criteria in the above post is 30/15
that is incorrect it is 30/12

and for nba totals i will use the 20/10

20 total services and at least 10 more on one side or its a no play

sorry i left that out in the above thread

truckin

[BM67]

What Time Fades

FOR BASKETS SIDE AND TOTAL LETS GO 2 FOR 2 ITS BOUT TIME

[jerry's kid]

Good call truck. Thanks for all the effort.

[Sportsrmylife]

Golden.....I think that you are onto a great idea. Eliminating some of the strong services from the play could increase the profitability of this adventure. For example...Executive was super hot on his 600% plays last year, now this may be more basketball than football so I hope that someone corrects me on this point. The true meaning of fading is to play against all those garbage services out there and not the strong ones. A play with 10-2 count on the broncos, but all the services on them are jeist, joe wiz, big al, etc would be a very powerful fade compared to a 15-0 count with PPP 6*, ASA 5*, and a few other services on that side. I think that the idea is great and the football season should be an absolute blast!!!!!

Keep on tweaking guys since each little idea could save or earn the forum big stacks of bennys!!!