Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

All You Need To Know About The Dance !

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    NCAA Tournament Conference Trends: Big 12


    We continue to get you ready for the NCAA Tournament with a series of columns uncovering recent trends in the Big Dance. Previous stories include:
    Overall Trends
    Analyzing Early Upsets
    Round of 64 Trends
    Round of 32 Trends
    Conference Trends: ACC
    Conference Trends: A-10
    This column continues our run of Conference Trends, featuring the Big 12, which has five teams in the 2011 NCAA Tournament field:
    #1 KANSAS
    #4 TEXAS
    #5 KANSAS STATE
    #7 TEXAS A&M
    #11 MISSOURI


    Tournament Trends by Conference
    Here are a few general trends regarding matchups between various level conferences, followed by specific trends for each league. ******* recognizes the Big 12 with an “A” rating.

    In matchups where an “A” team is seeded better than a “B” school, the “A” team is 33-21-2 ATS (61%) since 2005.

    “A” vs. “D” matchups have been dominated by the “A” teams to the tune of 36-3 SU and 25-11-3 ATS (69%) over the past four years.

    Thirteen of the last 17 (76%) matchups between better seeded “B” teams and worse seeded “A” teams have finished OVER the total.

    When “B” conferences have been favored over “A” schools since 1999, the OVER is 26-14 (65%).

    Big 12 Trends
    The Big 12 has been one of the best conferences in the tournament over the last three years at 32-18 SU & 30-19 ATS (61%). However, after an incredible two-year run of 19-0 SU & 17-2 ATS as favorites, the Big 12 was just 8-5 SU & 5-7-1 ATS as favorites in 2010.

    Also entering last year, Big 12 favorites of 7 to 13.5 points were on an eye-popping run of 28-2 SU & 25-5 ATS in the NCAAs since 1998. But last year, the Big 12 was 0-2 ATS (1-1 SU) in this situation. Baylor failed to cover a 10.5-point spread against Sam Houston State and Kansas lost outright as an 11.5-point favorite to Northern Iowa.

    As a pick ‘em or small favorite (less than 2.5 points), Big 12 teams are 18-9 SU & ATS (67%).

    In NCAA games pitting Big 12 vs. Big East over the past five years, favorites are 10-0 SU & 8-2 ATS, and the OVER is 7-2-1. When the Big 12 plays Big Ten schools, the favorites are 9-1 SU & ATS. Texas A&M broke this nine-game unbeaten streak last year when it lost as a two-point favorite to Purdue in the second round.
    Remember the 3 G's Gambling, Golf, Girls not in any particular order.....

    Comment


    • #17
      NCAA Tournament Conference Trends: Big East


      We continue to get you ready for the NCAA Tournament with a series of columns uncovering recent trends in the Big Dance. Previous stories include:
      Overall Trends
      Analyzing Early Upsets
      Round of 64 Trends
      Round of 32 Trends
      Conference Trends: ACC
      Conference Trends: A-10
      Conference Trends: Big 12

      This column continues our run of Conference Trends, featuring the Big East, which has a tournament-record 11 teams in the 2011 NCAA Tournament field:
      #1 PITTSBURGH
      #2 NOTRE DAME
      #3 SYRACUSE
      #3 CONNECTICUT
      #4 LOUISVILLE
      #5 WEST VIRGINIA
      #6 GEORGETOWN
      #6 ST. JOHN’S
      #6 CINCINNATI
      #9 VILLANOVA
      #11 MARQUETTE


      Tournament Trends by Conference
      Here are a few general trends regarding matchups between various level conferences, followed by specific trends for each league. ******* recognizes the Big East with an “A” rating.

      In matchups where an “A” team is seeded better than a “B” school, the “A” team is 33-21-2 ATS (61%) since 2005.

      “A” vs. “D” matchups have been dominated by the “A” teams to the tune of 36-3 SU and 25-11-3 ATS (69%) over the past four years.

      Thirteen of the last 17 (76%) matchups between better seeded “B” teams and worse seeded “A” teams have finished OVER the total.

      When “B” conferences have been favored over “A” schools since 1999, the OVER is 26-14 (65%).

      Big East Trends
      Over the past five years, oddsmakers have priced out Big East teams, as they are 54-37 SU (59%), but just 39-51-1 ATS (43%) in the NCAA Tournament.

      Big East favorites of 3 points or less were 0-3 SU & ATS last year, lowering the conference’s record to 7-13 SU and 5-15 ATS (25%) in the last 20 instances.

      There used to be a day when picking a Big East underdog was a great bet, but not so recently. Big East schools are just 6-17 SU and 9-14 ATS as underdogs in the tournament since 2006.

      Against “C” level conferences in the NCAAs, the Big East is just 14-10 SU and 6-18 ATS (25%) over the past 13 years.

      Several significant trends have formed in the tourney series between the Big East and Pac-10 recently. Since 2002, favorites are 15-2 SU & 12-4-1 ATS, while the Big East has a decisive 11-6 SU & 11-5-1 advantage. The OVER is also 11-5-1 when these two conferences meet up.
      Remember the 3 G's Gambling, Golf, Girls not in any particular order.....

      Comment


      • #18
        NCAA Tournament Conference Trends: Big Ten


        We continue to get you ready for the NCAA Tournament with a series of columns uncovering recent trends in the Big Dance. Previous stories include:
        Overall Trends
        Analyzing Early Upsets
        Round of 64 Trends
        Round of 32 Trends
        Conference Trends: ACC
        Conference Trends: A-10
        Conference Trends: Big 12
        Conference Trends: Big East
        This column continues our run of Conference Trends, featuring the Big Ten, which has seven teams in the 2011 NCAA Tournament field:
        #1 OHIO STATE
        #3 PURDUE
        #4 WISCONSIN
        #8 MICHIGAN
        #9 ILLINOIS
        #10 PENN ST
        #10 MICHIGAN ST


        Tournament Trends by Conference
        Here are a few general trends regarding matchups between various level conferences, followed by specific trends for each league. ******* recognizes the Big Ten with an “A” rating.

        In matchups where an “A” team is seeded better than a “B” school, the “A” team is 33-21-2 ATS (61%) since 2005.

        “A” vs. “D” matchups have been dominated by the “A” teams to the tune of 36-3 SU and 25-11-3 ATS (69%) over the past four years.

        Thirteen of the last 17 (76%) matchups between better seeded “B” teams and worse seeded “A” teams have finished OVER the total.

        When “B” conferences have been favored over “A” schools since 1999, the OVER is 26-14 (65%).

        Big Ten Trends
        As underdogs of five points or less, Big Ten teams are an impressive 28-17 SU & 29-16 ATS (64%) in the past 45 instances.

        Big Ten teams are an incredible 39-2 SU & 25-11-4 ATS (69%) in tournament games when favored by at least 6.5 points in the past 11 years.

        Although they don’t always get the respect of the other “A” conferences, Big Ten teams are 19-10 SU and 20-9 ATS (69%) when taking on other “A” conferences in the past four tournaments.

        The favorites are a perfect 7-0 SU & ATS when a Big Ten team faces a Conference USA school in the NCAAs.

        Underdogs have the advantage when Big Ten and SEC teams square off, going 10-9 SU and 14-5 ATS since 1999. The Big Ten leads this series 12-7 SU & ATS over this span.
        Remember the 3 G's Gambling, Golf, Girls not in any particular order.....

        Comment

        Working...
        X