I've been betting sports for a long time but I'm not sure I've ever seen a weirder line on an exposed game. An exposed game is one where it's the only one being played on a given day and is high profile. There is no game more exposed than the Super Bowl. Everyone knows everything about the two teams. There's usually very little value.
Almost all NFL point spreads are set off of the power ratings at Las Vegas Sports Service (the old Roxy Roxborough company). Their power ratings are similar to everybody else's. You add 3 1/2-4 points to the home team and the line is set. Everybody's power ratings this year have Indy anywhere from 0.9 to 1.5 points better than New Orleans. Yet the line opened at -3 and has ballooned everywhere to -5 1/2.
I know there's emotionalism involved and everyone realizes New Orleans was very lucky to beat Minnesota. (I know this better than anybody. I had a large futures bet on the Vikes to win the NFC and a +600 on them to win the Super Bowl.) That not withstanding, there is no plausible explanation for the line going all the way to +5 1/2.
Indy can't stop the run and won more than half its games in nail biters. Has everyone forgotten that? The one thing I've always been able to do, probably because of hanging out with too many bookies, is figure out what a line will be and where the movement will go. I am shocked by this line. I've never seen anything like it in an exposed game like the Super Bowl.
The only thing I can do in response to this is set the emotions aside. I'm all in on New Orleans.
Almost all NFL point spreads are set off of the power ratings at Las Vegas Sports Service (the old Roxy Roxborough company). Their power ratings are similar to everybody else's. You add 3 1/2-4 points to the home team and the line is set. Everybody's power ratings this year have Indy anywhere from 0.9 to 1.5 points better than New Orleans. Yet the line opened at -3 and has ballooned everywhere to -5 1/2.
I know there's emotionalism involved and everyone realizes New Orleans was very lucky to beat Minnesota. (I know this better than anybody. I had a large futures bet on the Vikes to win the NFC and a +600 on them to win the Super Bowl.) That not withstanding, there is no plausible explanation for the line going all the way to +5 1/2.
Indy can't stop the run and won more than half its games in nail biters. Has everyone forgotten that? The one thing I've always been able to do, probably because of hanging out with too many bookies, is figure out what a line will be and where the movement will go. I am shocked by this line. I've never seen anything like it in an exposed game like the Super Bowl.
The only thing I can do in response to this is set the emotions aside. I'm all in on New Orleans.
Comment