Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
You know the NBA is fixed when.....
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by KazDog View PostI'm not saying the NBA is fixing it, but more so, would be VERY easy for a player to fix it. Players fixing for friends and what not would be fairly easy.
KAZ"CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostSure it would be easy. Fixing anything in sports is fairly easy. But this? Come on now, Kaz. This is almost comical. And I mean no offense. But Chandler is risking his million dollar contract to win his friend a couple grand? Really? And what, did Chandler sit himself for the final quarter?
KAZ
Comment
-
Originally posted by wayne1218 View PostIf you want the truth, i thought i saw it all until this thread came up. Absolutely RIDICULOUS to think that imo.
Wayne
KAZ
Comment
-
If you want the truth, i would have jumped on Stuckey -3 like stink on shit if it was me. I never even look at those but Chandler is very inconsistent and Stuckey is the leading scorer on most nights. I would have been all over Rodney on that one and won i guess.
Wayne
Comment
-
Originally posted by KazDog View PostIf you don't think it looks fishy, that's your opinion. Why would a player sit out an entire quarter? After scoring 17 points and 6 boards? The coach sat him for some reason. Don't know why. But Stuckey beats him after not scoring for the entire quarter and puts in a lay up with 15 seconds left. Stuckey was in for the whole quarter. Looks odd to me.
KAZ"CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostOkay, did Chandler sit himself? Is that what you intend to say? Did he sit specifically for the purpose of letting Stuckey win the prop bet? Was Stuckey in on it too?? Answer these questions. Please.
After all the crap that came down about Donaghy and how he said these games are fixed night in and night out by a variety of people, I wouldn't put it past anyone that this could have been fixed, even if it was so slightly. "Hey coach, I turned my ankle and it's sore" or whatever....Looked bogus to me. YOU DONT SIT A GUY WITH 17 PTS, 6 BOARDS AND 3 ASTS FOR THE ENTIRE 4th.....
KAZ
Comment
-
Originally posted by KazDog View PostWho knows why he sat. Would you sit someone with 17 points and 6 rebounds and 3 assists, for the entire 4th quarter, of a game that was within single digits for the entire quarter? Answer that question. Why was he sitting? That's what looks fishy. And that Stuckey beats him with 15 secs left after not scoring for the entire quarter.
After all the crap that came down about Donaghy and how he said these games are fixed night in and night out by a variety of people, I wouldn't put it past anyone that this could have been fixed, even if it was so slightly. "Hey coach, I turned my ankle and it's sore" or whatever....Looked bogus to me. YOU DONT SIT A GUY WITH 17 PTS, 6 BOARDS AND 3 ASTS FOR THE ENTIRE 4th.....
KAZ
But if you think it is so shady down to the point that they are fixing player props, then don't bet it.
And by the way, if they were to fix player props, they would have fixed this one for the favorite, because looking at stats every square this side of the Mississippi, would have been on Stuckey at +140.
That is unless, your bet was so big they had to fix it against you"CFB YTD: 5-8-1 -16.2"
Comment
-
What about the game and total being decided by 2 points.Knicks -7.5 and win by 8 and total 191.5 and final score was 99-91.Should we suggest that he was sat so he didn't score 2 more points to make the game go over?Come on Kaz.That political forum is making you delirious
Comment
-
Originally posted by mavskidd02 View PostYou're answering questions with questions. You're the forum's number 1 debater. And you can't come up with anything better than this? I DON'T KNOW WHY CHANDLER SAT. I didn't watch the game, I don't really care about the NBA.
But if you think it is so shady down to the point that they are fixing player props, then don't bet it.
And by the way, if they were to fix player props, they would have fixed this one for the favorite, because looking at stats every square this side of the Mississippi, would have been on Stuckey at +140.
That is unless, your bet was so big they had to fix it against you
Your questions were why fix it or did Chandler sit himself or Stuckey in on it? My answer, whether it be in the form of a question or not is, why was he sitting the entire 4th?
And if you're going to fix a bet, you'd want the best odds in your favor. Getting +130 with Stuckey is a lot better than laying -165 with Chandler.
Believe whatever you want. This looked fishy to me. The line movement, the player sitting, scoring with 15 secs left at the end of an 8 point loss and why was Stuckey even in at that point?
KAZ
Comment
Comment