Originally posted by flarendep1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
monday night football in-game thread...
Collapse
X
-
actually not true in this case. The ruling was that Fitz didn't maintain possession through the catch. It wasn't joint possession b/c they ruled Fitz didn't maintain possession. If the ball doesn't hit the ground (and in bounds of course) it can't be an incomplete pass. Since Fitz didn't catch it, it seems like it would have to be an interception.Originally posted by flarendep1 View PostI dont think it ever would have been an INT because they hit the ground with joint possesion which IMO should have gone to AZ, once they hit the ground progrees stopped by contact with the reciever, dead ball right at the spot.
Comment
-


Comment