Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Recognizing an NFL Trap

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Recognizing an NFL Trap

    Trapping the NFL

    By: Stephen Nover
    Is there such a thing as a trap game in the NFL?

    I once asked that question to Pete Korner, who at the time was office manager and a senior linesmaker for Las Vegas Sports Consultants.

    Korner almost ripped my head off. There is no such thing as a trap game, he loudly berated me. It’s a myth. The numbers are made using power ratings, he said.

    There are trap games, though. They just might not be what you think. The perception is of a good team, say Philadelphia, laying a small number against New Orleans.

    Using the highly-respected power ranking from The Gold Sheet, you’d find the Eagles with a power rating of 4 and the Saints at 8. When you factor the game being played in New Orleans, you could see why the line opened so short at less than a field goal.

    For some, this makes it enticing to take the Eagles. That’s not a real trap game, though.

    A real trap game, says professional gambler Dave Malinsky, is thinking you’re getting value betting a bad team, which brings us to the Oakland Raiders-Denver Broncos matchup.

    The Raiders are +15 in this long-standing division rivalry. Denver is on a short week having dispatched Baltimore Monday. However, the Raiders haven’t covered the spread their last 10 games.

    Many bettors don’t trust the Raiders to give a full effort. Few think much of Art Shell and his Oakland’s coaching staff.

    So oddsmakers have to do something to make Oakland attractive if they hope to get equal action.

    Now Malinsky is a value shopper. But he won’t touch the Raiders even getting more than two touchdowns.

    “I try to eliminate the undisciplined, unfocused teams because they’re the ones most likely to suffer the bad beats,” he said.

    Near the top of Malinsky’s list of stay-away teams is the Miami Dolphins, who have yet to cover a spread this season.

    “Whatever you think of Nick Saban, you have to look at the penalties and turnovers,” Malinsky said.

    It’s easy to point out the Dolphins failed to get the money this past week against New England because Olindo Mare missed a field goal and had another field goal blocked. But even though the Dolphins outgained the Patriots, 283-213, they committed eight penalties.

    Bad teams not only cost themselves victories, but pointspread covers as well. The Arizona Cardinals and Green Bay Packers are two more examples.

    The Cardinals couldn’t have been in a better position this past Sunday, up 14-0 at home against a mediocre Kansas City Chiefs squad. But they couldn’t hold it. The Packers got a push against St. Louis, but also could have won losing by three when Brett Favre fumbled at the St. Louis 11-yard line with 44 seconds left.

    “The Packers were in a position to beat Philadelphia, too,” Malinsky said. “But they couldn’t even cover double digits.

    “These teams just make mistakes and it costs you … they always will look good from a value standpoint. They really will. But that’s the trap.”

    Houston and Tennessee rank among the six-worst teams. Malinsky wouldn’t be afraid to take either of these teams, however, if the price were high enough.

    The Texans are bad, Malinsky said, but they have some discipline. The Titans showed they could not only come up with an outstanding game plan, but execute it as well, losing by one to the Colts on the road as an 18 ?-point underdog this past Sunday.

    “Jeff Fisher is a worker,” Malinsky said of the Titans coach. “I’m not sure how hard Art Shell wants to work when he gets out of bed.”

    Fisher, though, could be out as Tennessee coach after this season. Is he still worth backing in the right spot, with the right price, as a lame duck coach?

    “It’s in his nature to keep working hard and not worry about any possible lame duck status,” Malinsky said. “He’s coaching for his resume.”

  • #2
    You talking to me????

    Great article Wayne!




    Go Indy!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      This story is from a year or two ago but it basically talks about a trap and what it is.

      Comment


      • #4
        Those 2 clowns ( Nover and Malinsky ) are services / paid touts.

        Not only do they suck at their profession ... they have no idea what they are talking about

        This may have as well been written by Brandon Lang

        Comment


        • #5
          Yea i figured that, Art Shelll tipped me off! I think I started a arguement on trap plays with my one and only play of the decade, but it's actually Vols fault, he agreed! Thanks again for the info!

          http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/no...-who-wins.html

          I know you can vote again.
          Vote Vols!

          Comment


          • #6
            By simple definition, a trap game is one where a team is looking past their current opponent towards the one they will be playing the next week. In those cases, the team may not be as prepared or as focused as they should be, and they may not cover like they should. It's frustrating as a football handicapper to come to a conclusion that a team is a legitimate bet, and then to have them fail to cover not because of what the other team did, but what they failed to do. It only makes sense, then, that it's good for the bottom line if we can identify trap games and avoid them (or at least consider how we are going to deal with them).


            How big of a problem are trap games? One study I found online, though not perfect, was very revealing. The study looked at the 2004-2006 NFL seasons. It identified trap games as one in which the line in the middle game of a three game set was at least seven points higher than the other two games. Say that a team had lines in three games of -4, -13, and -2. Looking back we could identify that middle game as a trap game because the team was clearly facing an inferior opponent that they would expect to beat easily. This isn't useful as a handicapping technique because you need the benefit of hindsight, but the results are nonetheless fascinating. The favorites in those trap games had a straight up record of 84-43. Against the spread they were disastrous - 53-72-2. That means the teams covered just 42.5 percent of the trap games they played. Betting on them in those cases would be a quick route to bankruptcy. By itself this study tells us little because of the impossibility of applying the criteria to current games, but it does indicate that there is something to the theory of trap games

            Comment


            • #7
              Potential trap: On the surface, the Cincinnati Bengals and Oakland Raiders shouldn’t be a close contest, right? The Raiders are 2-7 and starting quarterback Bruce Gradkowski against the first-place Bengals (7-2). But when you look deeper, consider the fact that Cincinnati has never won in Oakland in eight attempts. The Bengals are coming off a huge emotional win over the Pittsburgh Steelers (letdown factor?), and starting tailback Cedric Benson is not expected to play with a hip injury. This has all the makings of a trap game in the NFL. The Bengals have been a mature team all season. Winning in Oakland for the first time would be another huge step in that maturation process.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Post
                Potential trap: On the surface, the Cincinnati Bengals and Oakland Raiders shouldn’t be a close contest, right? The Raiders are 2-7 and starting quarterback Bruce Gradkowski against the first-place Bengals (7-2). But when you look deeper, consider the fact that Cincinnati has never won in Oakland in eight attempts. The Bengals are coming off a huge emotional win over the Pittsburgh Steelers (letdown factor?), and starting tailback Cedric Benson is not expected to play with a hip injury. This has all the makings of a trap game in the NFL. The Bengals have been a mature team all season. Winning in Oakland for the first time would be another huge step in that maturation process.
                If the line was Cincy -2.5, i would agree with you. It's not. It's -9.5 and hell, that is hard to cover on the road anywhere in the NFL with all your players. If anything, Oakland looks like the easy pick there to me.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Beyond The BCS: Trap Games on Tap


                  This week, they take a look at a few possible look-ahead or letdown situations on the card.

                  Kent State at Temple (-13.5)

                  The surprising Owls increased their winning streak to eight with a dominating 56-17 win at Akron last week. They are atop the MAC East standings at 6-0 and own a one-game lead over next week’s opponent, Ohio.

                  Kent State hasn’t been nearly as bad as expected, especially after losing all-time leading rusher Eugene Jarvis two weeks into the season. The Golden Flashes won three straight, before a bad road loss at Akron.

                  But Kent State has had two weeks to get over that loss and prepare for Temple.

                  Kent State racked over 550 yards of offense in last year’s win over Temple.

                  Nevada (-31.5) at New Mexico State

                  Nevada is one of the hottest teams in the nation, having won seven straight after a disastrous 0-3 start.

                  New Mexico is one of the coldest teams in the nation, having lost four straight without scoring an offensive touchdown in any of those games.

                  As the statistics and the 31.5-point line suggests, this is a big-time mismatch. But it was a big-time mismatch last year too, when the Aggies went into Nevada and won straight up as a 19.5-point underdog. That upset is New Mexico State’s only WAC road win since joining the conference in 2005.

                  The memory of that game alone might be enough to keep the Wolf Pack focused on the task at hand instead of next Friday’s showdown with Boise State.

                  "Don't think for a minute, after (the 52-14 win over Fresno State on Saturday), that the kids didn't start talking about last year's game," Nevada coach Chris Ault told the Reno Gazette-Journal. "We didn't have to say a word."

                  TCU (-31.5) at Wyoming

                  With Wyoming and winless New Mexico left on the schedule, TCU all but assured itself of an undefeated regular season with last week’s rout of Utah. That makes Saturday’s 900-mile trip to Laramie a serious letdown possibility.

                  Wyoming beat TCU the last time the Frogs made the haul up north (2007), but this is obviously a different TCU squad. Utah head coach Kyle Whittingham said TCU was the “best team we’ve played” in the last five seasons. That includes Alabama and Oregon.

                  TCU knows even a sloppy win in either of its final two games would do serious damage to its reputation. But sometimes teams start pressing when they try to blow someone out.

                  This is a difficult test against a Wyoming team that’s riding a little momentum after last week’s comeback win at San Diego State. The Cowboys scored 24 unanswered points in the fourth quarter to knock off the Aztecs.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by wayne1218 View Post
                    If the line was Cincy -2.5, i would agree with you. It's not. It's -9.5 and hell, that is hard to cover on the road anywhere in the NFL with all your players. If anything, Oakland looks like the easy pick there to me.
                    That wasnt my write up. Just an example of what is considered a trap game.

                    A trap game and a trap line are two diffrent things IMO

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by GOLDENGREEK View Post
                      That wasnt my write up. Just an example of what is considered a trap game.

                      A trap game and a trap line are two diffrent things IMO

                      I don't believe in traps anyway to be honest. I just don't. Either a team covers or they don't. I think the word "Trap" in gambling is something a gambler lets enter their head. I don't believe in it. Some lines look easy and they end up being easy and some look easy and lose, leaving you scratching your head. I just don't believe or buy in to traps. Never have.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        its a trap Pictures, Images and Photos
                        Last edited by Spark; 11-21-2009, 03:11 PM.
                        The Rice Truck is NEVER Wrong!!!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X